Skip to main content

Early Lessons on Censorship and on Competing Concepts of the Press: Student Journalism in Mexico’s Transition to Democracy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Journalism Pedagogy in Transitional Countries

Abstract

La Catarina was the student newspaper of the Universidad de las Américas-Puebla (UDLAP), one of Mexico’s most exclusive colleges. Since the publication’s foundation, in 2000, it served both as a lab for journalism students and as a forum for the college community. While editorially independent, occasional calls from the administration reminded journalists that some issues had better be avoided. Mexico was transitioning from 71 years of one-party rule to the presidency of opposition candidate Vicente Fox, and the Mexican press, too, was walking on a tightrope. The closing down of La Catarina caused protests of students and faculty, caught the attention of domestic and international media, and it was denounced by press freedom NGOs. By mid-2007, some 50 professors had been fired for protesting, including the near entirety of the Communication department. By offering their own direct testimony, the authors chronicle the closure of La Catarina and analyze how the conflict became so tense that it left little or no room for negotiation. Especially in terms of concepts of the press—and, therefore, of models to teach journalism—two competing models clashed fiercely. On the one side, the administration held a political clientelist view, where the press was expected to show loyalty to government, and adhere to implicit norms of obedience and self-censorship. On the other side, most of the faculty and students adopted the Western concept of journalism that was being taught in the classroom. The confrontation reproduced the national, complex disputes over the exercise of journalism, but even more critically, both sides failed to identify that different logics were at play. The language, the methods, and the objectives of these two concepts of the press were so distant that they prevented the parties from clearly understanding what each other was defending.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Among these theories, Lawson mentions the openness of the political system, economic development and modernity, the adoption of new technologies, and economic liberalization.

  2. 2.

    The libertarian model of the press considers that freedom of press will give more freedom to media to reveal the real thing happening in the society without any censorship or any authority blockades.

  3. 3.

    Hachten’s Western model of the press encompassed both the libertarian and social-responsibility models with its defining characteristic being that it is relatively free of arbitrary government controls (Hachten, 1996).

  4. 4.

    This model is characterised by medium levels of newspaper circulation, strong professionalization, and low levels of parallelism and state intervention. (Hallin & Mancini, 2004).

  5. 5.

    Hallin and Mancini (2004, 2012) criticize Siebert, Peterson and Schramm’s superficiality, ethnocentrism, and lack of empirical data, and question whether a unified Western model exists. However, they admit that the boundaries between models are blurry and that “it is possible to imagine a complete convergence of media systems in the United States and Western Europe toward something close to the Liberal Model” (2004, p. 283).

  6. 6.

    For instance, the university had funded a nopal processing plant to help local farmers sell their products abroad. UDLA’s poor managing resulted in a debt of 2.5 million pesos (USD 217,000) for the farmers. La Catarina broke the story.

  7. 7.

    At this point, the friendly university security officers turned into a surveillant police force. Officers, both undercover and in uniform, began following student journalists and communication faculty members, and videotaped and photographed student movements or demonstrations.

  8. 8.

    During the vacation, the administration fired a communication professor who had openly confronted Martha Laris, and it became apparent that most of the university’s employees either feared talking or received direct orders not to talk to La Catarina’s reporters.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Magallanes Blanco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Castells-Talens, A., Blanco, C.M., Santillana, J.C., Viveros, A. (2022). Early Lessons on Censorship and on Competing Concepts of the Press: Student Journalism in Mexico’s Transition to Democracy. In: Garrisi, D., Kuang, X. (eds) Journalism Pedagogy in Transitional Countries. Palgrave Studies in Journalism and the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13749-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics