Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Narrow Conception of Responsibility in Environmental Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Responsibility in Environmental Governance

Part of the book series: Environmental Politics and Theory ((EPT))

  • 233 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces current research on the concept of responsibility in terms of predominant conceptualizations and attempts to measure responsibility empirically. Looking at the dominant use of the concept in global governance research and specifically in the field of environmental governance, the chapter diagnoses a relatively narrow understanding of responsibility as accountability, and to a lesser extent, an understanding as liability that dominates the academic discourse. Methodologically, most studies are primarily concerned with measuring environmental impacts, establishing a causal link between individual actions and measured impacts, and with how such a link is perceived by other actors. Taken together, both foci not only severely narrow the potential applications of responsibility analyses, but this restricted view has, so the argument, also social and political consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baer, P. (2012). The Greenhouse Development Rights framework for global burden sharing: Reflection on principles and prospects. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34, 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920507084623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barral, V. (2020). Common but differentiated responsibilities and justice. The Rise of Responsibility in World Politics, 125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S. (2022). The assigning and erosion of responsibility for the global environment. In The Routledge handbook on responsibility in international relations (pp. 138–152). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., & Gupta, A. (2011). Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1856–1864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H., Edwards, G. A., & Fuller, S. (2014). Contesting climate justice in the city: Examining politics and practice in urban climate change experiments. Global Environmental Change, 25, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S., & Pattberg, P. (2008). Private rule-making and the politics of accountability: Analyzing global forest governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), pp. 103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J. (2005). Global environmental governance for corporate responsibility and accountability. Global Environmental Politics, 5, 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J., & Fuchs, D. A. (2009). Agrifood corporations, global governance, and sustainability: A framework for analysis. In D. A. Fuchs & J. Clapp (Eds.), Corporate power in global agrifood governance (Food, health, and the environment). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory (3rd ed.). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSI. (2006). The social footprint—Introduction and proof of concept. Draft 3.1 (Centre for Sustainable Innovation, VT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daase, C., Junk, J., Kroll, S., & Rauer, V. (2017). Politik und Verantwortung: Analysen zum Wandel politischer Entscheidungs- und Rechtfertigungspraktiken (1st ed., Sonderheft PVS). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M.-L., & Sahlin, K. (2012). Reordering the world: Transnational regulatory governance and its challenges. In D. Lēwî-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S., & Pickering, J. (2019). The politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumay, J., Guthrie, J., & Farneti, F. (2010). GRI sustainability reporting guidelines for public and third sector organizations: A critical review. Public Management Review, 12(4), 531–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (2016). Responsibility for climate change as a structural injustice. In T. Gabrielson, C. Hall, J. M. Meyer, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental political theory (Oxford handbooks). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, S., Rigby, D., & Wossink, A. (2012). Using best–worst scaling to explore perceptions of relative responsibility for ensuring food safety. Food Policy, 37, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, T. (2008). Locating responsibility: The problem of moral agency in international relations. In The Oxford handbook of international relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M. (2014). Dynamics of global governance: Building on what we know. International Studies Quarterly, 58, 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2017). Configuring climate responsibility in the city: Carbon footprints and climate justice in Hong Kong. Area, 49(4), 519–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, F. (2012). Practicing environmental responsibility: Local and global dimensions. Social Responsibility Journal, 8, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111211196548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines. Global Reporting Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen-Magnusson, H., & Vetterlein, A. (Eds.). (2022). The Routledge handbook on responsibility in international relations. Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haflidadottir, H., & Lang, A. F., Jr. (2020). Responsibility and climate change. The Rise of Responsibility in World Politics, 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. B., Tilley, J., & Wittrock, J. (2013). Listening to the government: How information shapes responsibility attributions. Political Behavior, 35, 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9183-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, J. (2018). Democratic moral agency: Altering unjust conditions in practices of responsibility. In Moral agency and the politics of responsibility (pp. 21–35). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2002). Exploring corporate strategy (6th ed.). FT Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleine, A., & von Hauff, M. (2009). Sustainability-driven implementation of corporate social responsibility: application of the integrative sustainability triangle. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0212-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinsky, S., Waskow, D., Northrop, E., & Bevins, W. (2016). Operationalizing equity and supporting ambition: Identifying a more robust approach to ‘respective capabilities.’ Climate and Development, 9, 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2016.1146121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, J. (2018). Exploring policy perceptions and responsibility of devolved decision-making for water service delivery in Kenya’s 47 county governments. Geoforum, 92, 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarz, T., & Park, S. (2016). Accountability in global environmental governance: A meaningful tool for action? Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarz, T., & Park, S. (2017). Introduction: The politics of environmental accountability. Review of Policy Research, 34(1), 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyper, J., Bäckstrand, K., & Schroeder, H. (2017). Institutional accountability of nonstate actors in the UNFCCC: Exit, voice, and loyalty. Review of Policy Research, 34(1), 88–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, D. (2012). From “big government” to “big governance”. The Oxford handbook of governance, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, L. (2009). Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of carbon and cost-benefit. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4), 499–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maniates, M. F. (2001). Individualization: Plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? Global Environmental Politics, 1, 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638001316881395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, M., & Tilley, J. (2010). The attribution of credit and blame to governments and its impact on vote choice. British Journal of Political Science, 40, 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. (2008). The governance of transnational environmental harm: Addressing new modes of accountability/responsibility. Global Environmental Politics, 8, 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. (2020). Transparency, accountability and empowerment in sustainability governance: A conceptual review. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1), 98–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mees, H., & Driessen, P. (2019). A framework for assessing the accountability of local governance arrangements for adaptation to climate change. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(4), 671–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, J.-F., & Orsini, A. (Eds.). (2015). Essential concepts of global environmental governance (Earthscan from Routledge). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounk, Y. (2017). The age of responsibility: Luck, choice, and the welfare state. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Münch, R. (2002). Handlungstheorie (Soziologische Theorie / Richard Münch; Band 2). Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (2008). Governance: “Empty signifier“ oder sozialwissenschaftliches Forschungs-programm? In G. F. Schuppert & M. Zürn (Eds.), Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt (1st ed., pp. 61–76). Politische Vierteljahresschrift Sonderheft, 41/2008). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften / GWV Fachverlage GmbH Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Kramarz, T. (Eds.). (2019). Global environmental governance and the accountability trap. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, M., & Stripple, J. (2010). My space: Governing individuals’ carbon emissions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1068/d4109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2015). Theorising global environmental governance: Key findings and future questions. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43, 684–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814561773

  • Pellizzoni, L. (2004). Responsibility and environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 13, 541–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000229034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, J., & Barry, C. (2012). On the concept of climate debt: Its moral and political value. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 15, 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.727311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (2004). The risk management of everything. Demos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2012). Governance in areas of limited statehood. In D. Lēwî-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 699–715). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, T. J. (2016). The meaning and measurement of responsibility attributions. American Politics Research, 44, 106–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X15595460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saling, P., Kicherer, A., Dittrich-Krämer, B., Wittlinger, R., Zombik, W., Schmidt, I., et al. (2002). Eco-efficiency analysis by BASF: The method. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 7(4), 2013–2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salles, D. (2011). Responsibility based environmental governance. SAPI EN. S. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society (4.1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Sturm, A. (1990). Ökologische Rationalität: Ansatzpunkte zur Ausgestaltung von ökologieorientierten Managementinstrumenten. Die Unternehmung: Swiss journal of business research and practice; Organ der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Betriebswirtschaft (SGB), 44(4), 273–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sondermann, E., Ulbert, C., & Finkenbusch, P. (2018). Introduction: Moral agency and the politics of responsibility. In Moral agency and the politics of responsibility (pp. 1–18). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, J., & Hobolt, S. B. (2011). Is the government to blame? An experimental test of how partisanship shapes perceptions of performance and responsibility. The Journal of Politics, 73, 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trnka, S., & Trundle, C. (Eds.). (2017). Competing responsibilities: The ethics and politics of contemporary life. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulbert, C., Finkenbusch, P., Sondermann, E., & Debiel, T. (Eds.). (2018). Moral agency and the politics of responsibility. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderheiden, S. (2011). Globalizing responsibility for climate change. Ethics & International Affairs, 25(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderheiden, S. (2016). Environmental and climate justice. In T. Gabrielson, C. Hall, J. M. Meyer, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental political theory (pp. 321–332, Oxford handbooks). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetterlein, A. (2018). Responsibility is more than accountability: From regulatory towards negotiated governance. Contemporary Politics, 24, 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2018.1452106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetterlein, A., & Hansen-Magnusson, H. (Eds.). (2020). The rise of responsibility in world politics (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G., & Wilkinson, R. (2014). Rethinking global governance? Complexity, authority, power, change. International Studies Quarterly, 58, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M. (2012). Global governance as multi-level governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 730–744). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Political Science, University of Münster, Muenster, Germany

    Tobias Gumbert

Authors
  1. Tobias Gumbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Gumbert .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gumbert, T. (2022). The Narrow Conception of Responsibility in Environmental Governance. In: Responsibility in Environmental Governance. Environmental Politics and Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13729-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13729-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13728-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13729-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation