Skip to main content

The Fight Against Discrimination on the Grounds of Sex, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the External Relations of the European Union

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Legal Issues of International Law from a Gender Perspective

Part of the book series: Gender Perspectives in Law ((GPL,volume 3))

  • 314 Accesses

Abstract

The paper assesses how non-discrimination on the grounds of sex, sexual orientation and gender identity is conceived within European Union (EU) external relations and the legal issues it encompasses. An analysis of the multifarious instruments the EU avails itself in shaping its external action makes it clear that the EU approach towards equality is neither holistic nor homogeneous.

The EU promotes gender equality in all fields of its external relations, but action to outlaw discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity is limited to accession to the EU and the European Neighbourhood Policy. EU external action to advance equality of women and LGBTIQ persons is suspended in a limbo between the protection of human rights and the economic rationale, which has rooted internal action in non-discrimination. The paper argues that the tension between the two approaches and the inconsistencies in promoting human rights in its external relations have prevented EU external action from eradicating the prejudices and stereotypes regarding discrimination on the grounds of sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thies (2020), p. 431.

  2. 2.

    Pech and Grogan (2020), p. 332; Thies (2020), p. 434; Cremona (2014), p. 17 et seq.; Cremona (2011), p. 280.

  3. 3.

    Article 208 para. 1. subpara.1 TFEU.

  4. 4.

    Article 214 para. 2 TFEU.

  5. 5.

    Article 207 para. 1 TFEU.

  6. 6.

    Council of the European Union (2008), Council of the European Union (2013) and European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2015a).

  7. 7.

    European Commission (2010), p. 27; European Commission (2015b), p. 17.

  8. 8.

    European Commission (2020a), p. 1.

  9. 9.

    European Commission (2020b), p. 1.

  10. 10.

    European Commission (2020k), p. 1.

  11. 11.

    European Commission (2020k), p. 19.

  12. 12.

    Pech and Grogan (2020), p. 343 et seq; Thies (2020), p. 439 et seq.

  13. 13.

    Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast), OJ L 204, (2006), 23–36.

  14. 14.

    Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security, OJ L 6, (1979), 24–25.

  15. 15.

    Council Directive 86/378/EEC of 24 July 1986 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in occupational social security schemes, OJ L 225, (1986), 40–42.

  16. 16.

    Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding (tenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), OJ L 348, (1992), 1–7.

  17. 17.

    Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 68, (2010), 13–20; Directive (EU) 2019/1158 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on work-life balance for parents and carers and repealing Council Directive 2010/18/EU, OJ L188, (2019), 79–93.

  18. 18.

    Directive 2010/41/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 7 July 2010 on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity in a self-employed capacity and repealing Council Directive 86/613/EEC, OJ L 180, (2010), 1–6.

  19. 19.

    Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services, OJ L 373 , (2004), 37–43.

  20. 20.

    Bell and Waddington (2021), p. 1406.

  21. 21.

    Case C-391/09, Malgožata Runevič-Vardyn and Łukasz Paweł Wardyn v. Vilniaus miesto savivaldybès administracija and Others, (ECJ 12 May 2011), para 43; Case C-414/16, Vera Egenberger v Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung eV (ECJ 17 April 2018), para. 47.

  22. 22.

    Case, C-507/18, NH v Associazione Avvocatura per I diritti LGBTI – Rete Lenford, (ECJ 23 April 2020) para. 38; Case C-555/07, Seda Kücükdeveci v Swedex GmbH & Co. KG., (ECJ 19 Juanuary 2010), para. 21.

  23. 23.

    Numhauser-Henning (2007), p. 147; Busby (2018), p. 120.

  24. 24.

    Hodson and Maer (2001) and Carmel (2003).

  25. 25.

    Hervey (2005), p. 310.

  26. 26.

    Burri and Prechal (2008), p. 12.

  27. 27.

    Schiek (2007), p. 434.

  28. 28.

    Hervey (2005), p. 310.

  29. 29.

    Weldon-Johns (2021), p. 316.

  30. 30.

    Guth and Elfving (2019), p. 110.

  31. 31.

    Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, OJ L 303, (2000), 16–22.

  32. 32.

    Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast), OJ L 337, (2011), 9–26.

  33. 33.

    See footnote 13.

  34. 34.

    The text of the Recital reads as follows: “The Court of Justice has held that the scope of the principle of equal treatment for men and women cannot be confined to the prohibition of discrimination based on the fact that a person is of one or other sex. In view of its purpose and the nature of the rights which it seeks to safeguard, it also applies to discrimination arising from the gender reassignment of a person.”

  35. 35.

    Bell (2012), p. 129 et seq.

  36. 36.

    Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions, OJ L 39 (1976), 40–42.

  37. 37.

    Case C-13/94, P v S and Cornwall County Council, (ECJ 30 April 1996), paras. 20–21.

  38. 38.

    Case C-117/01, K.B. v National Health Service Pensions Agency and Secretary of State for Health, (ECJ 7 Juanuary 2004).

  39. 39.

    Case C-423/04, Sarah Margaret Richards v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, (ECJ 27 April 2006).

  40. 40.

    Case C249/96, Lisa Jacqueline Grant v South-West Trains Ltd, (ECJ 17 February 1998).

  41. 41.

    Joined Cases C-122/99 P and C-125/99 P, D and Kingdom of Sweden v Council of the European Union, (ECJ 31 May 2001).

  42. 42.

    Case C-267/06, Tadao Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen Bühnen, (ECJ 1 April 2008), para. 72.

  43. 43.

    Case C- 147/08, Jürgen Römer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, (ECJ 10 May 2011), paras. 42-51.

  44. 44.

    Bell (2012), p. 140.

  45. 45.

    Case C- 528/13, Geoffrey Léger v Ministre des Affaires sociales, de la Santé et des Droits des femmes and Etablissement français du sang, (ECJ 29 April 2015).

  46. 46.

    Guth and Elfving (2019), p. 124.

  47. 47.

    Case C-473/16, F v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal, (ECJ 25 Juanuary 2018), para. 62. The Yogyakarta principles were draft by the International Panel of Experts in International Human Rights Law and on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. They are available at yogyakartaprinciples.org.

  48. 48.

    Zagreb Declaration, 6 May 2020, para. 7.

  49. 49.

    See the latest Progress Reports European Commission (2021c), p. 32; European Commission (2021d), p. 30; European Commission (2021e), p. 34; European Commission (2021f), p. 37; European Commission (2021g), p. 37; European Commission (2021h), p. 33; European Commission (2021i), p. 32.

  50. 50.

    European Commission (2021b), p. 8.

  51. 51.

    European Commission (2021e), p. 34.

  52. 52.

    See the latest Progress Reports European Commission (2021c), p. 95; European Commission (2021d), p. 86; European Commission (2021e), p. 89; European Commission (2021f), p. 94; European Commission (2021g), p. 101; European Commission (2021h), p. 89; European Commission (2021i), p. 83.

  53. 53.

    European Commission (2021c), p. 34. See also European Commission (2021d), p. 31; European Commission (2021e), p. 31; European Commission (2021f), p. 39; European Commission (2021g), p. 38; European Commission (2021h), p. 35; European Commission (2021i), p. 34; European Commission (2020c), p. 36; European Commission (2020d), p. 38; European Commission (2020e), p. 40.

  54. 54.

    European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2020a), p. 15.

  55. 55.

    European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2020b), p. 5; European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2019b), p. 8.

  56. 56.

    European Commission and High representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2018a), pp. 4–5.

  57. 57.

    European Commission and High representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2018b), p. 8; European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2017a), p. 5.

  58. 58.

    Fortas (2016), p. 361 et seq.

  59. 59.

    Bartels (2005); Cremona (1996).

  60. 60.

    Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 3-286. See also art. 8.10 para. 2 (d) of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada of the one part and the European Union and its Member States of the other part, OJ L 11,14.1.2017, 23-1079.

  61. 61.

    Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States of the one part and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam of the other part, OJ L 329, 3.12.2016, 8-42. See also art 38 h) of the Interim Agreement Establishing a Framework for Economic Partnership between Eastern and Southern African States on one part and the European Community and its Member States on the other part, OJ L 111, 24.4.2012, 3-1172; art. 44 Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States on one side and the Andean Community and its Member Countries (Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Perù and Venezuela) on the other (the agreement has not entered into force – see the Joint Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of a Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Andean Community and its Member Countries (Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela), of the other part, JOIN (2016) 4 final, 2016/0025 (NLE).

  62. 62.

    Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008, OJ L 303, 31.10.2012, 1–82.

  63. 63.

    i.e. Association Agreement.

  64. 64.

    European Commission (2021a), p. 5.

  65. 65.

    The text of the initialled agrement is available at: https://ec.europa.eu/international- partnerships/system/files/negotiated-agreement-text-initialled-by-eu-oacps-chief-negotiators-20210415_en.pdf.

  66. 66.

    See Articles 1 (objectives), 2 (principles), 7 (cross-cutting themes), 10 (gender equality), 17 (conflicts and crises), 21 (education), 36 (gender equality and women’s and girl’s empowerment), 77 (global alliances and international cooperation), 80 (areas of international action).

  67. 67.

    It has to be observed that women are the only individuals considered in the provision on education (Artcile 28), and universal access to sexual and reproductive health commodities (Article 29), and human and social development fields (Article 27), and inclusive and sustainable growth (Article 43), and entrepreneurship (Article 45), and trade and sustainable development (Article 49).

  68. 68.

    European Commission (2015a), p. 9.

  69. 69.

    Council of the European Union (2019).

  70. 70.

    United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000).

  71. 71.

    United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000).

  72. 72.

    Council of the European Union (2018a); European Commission (2015a), para. 2.

  73. 73.

    European Commission 2015a, para. 2.

  74. 74.

    United Nations General Assembly Resolution (2015).

  75. 75.

    United Nations General Assembly Resolution (2015), para. 3.

  76. 76.

    Council of the European Union (2013).

  77. 77.

    European Commission (2020j), p. 14. A joint European Commission-World Bank roundtable was held on 23 September 2019 within the framework of admission. Furthermore, the EU provided support to the regional LGBTI Equal Rights Association for Western Balkans and Turkey (ERA) conference that took place on 7–9 November 2019 in Albania. Under the ENP meetings with civil society organizations were held at the EU headquartes to promote the rights of LGBTI people. The EU also funded a regional LGBTI conference on 27–29 September 2019 which gathered activists and civil society organisations from the Middle East and North Africa regions. As regards relations with third countries it is worth mentioning the side event to the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) and the equality of transgender people that was organised in March 2019. The Commission also supported the ILGA Europe Annual LGBTI Conference, which took place in Prague in October 2019. The dialogue that was developed and the assistance to the working of LGBTIQ organisations contributed to the spread of awareness on the problems of the LGBTIQ community, but fighting stereotypes needs radical changes that cannot be brought about by the said initiatives.

  78. 78.

    European Commission (2020b), p. 8.

  79. 79.

    European Commission (2020b), p. 14.

  80. 80.

    European Commission (2020b), p. 15. See also European Parliament (2021), para. 8.

  81. 81.

    European Commission (2020k), p. 5–7 .

  82. 82.

    European Commission (2019a), p. 27.

  83. 83.

    European Commission (2019a), p. 29; European Commission (2020d), p. 37; European Commission (2020e), p. 40; European Commission (2020f), p. 32.

  84. 84.

    European Commission (2021g), p. 38.

  85. 85.

    European Commission (2021f), p. 41. See also European Commission (2021e), p. 35.

  86. 86.

    European Commission (2015a), p. 9.

  87. 87.

    European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2015a), p. 3.

  88. 88.

    Atrey (2019), p. 78 et seq.

  89. 89.

    European Commission (2020a), p. 4.

  90. 90.

    European Commission (2020a), p. 7.

  91. 91.

    European Commission (2020k), p. 5.

  92. 92.

    European Commission (2020e), p. 39; European Commission (2020c), p. 34; European Commission (2020d), p. 37; European Commission (2020g), p. 34 et seq.; European Commission (2020b), p. 8 et seq.; European Commission (2019b), p. 5; Council of the European Union (2019), p. 10 et seq.

  93. 93.

    European Commission (2021d), p. 30.

  94. 94.

    European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2018c), p. 5.

  95. 95.

    On the relationship between sexuality, violence and male power over women see MacKinnon (1987), p. 32 et seq.

  96. 96.

    European Commission (2021g), p. 38.

  97. 97.

    See also the negotiated Partnership Agreement between the EU and members of the Organization of ACP countries establishing cooperation between the Parties with the aim of delivering universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services within the context of gender equality and empowerment of girls and women (Article 48 para. 7; Article. 29 para. 5, Article 32 para. 2, Article 40 para 6).

  98. 98.

    European Commission (2020b), p. 12.

  99. 99.

    European Commission (2021b), p. 4; European Commission (2020c), p. 91 et seq.; European Commission (2020d), p. 96 et seq.; European Commission (2020f), p. 82 et seq.; European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2019a), p. 4 et seq.; European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2018b), p. 6; Article 1 para.1 Draft provisions on Trade and Gender Equality in the context of the Modernisation of the EU-Chile Association Agreement; Council of the European Union, (2018a) para. 75; Article 33 of the negotiated Partnership Agreement between the EU and ACP.

  100. 100.

    European Commission (2015a); Article 31 of the Cotonou Agreement; Articles 36 and 45 of the negotiated Partnership Agreement between the EU and ACP; Article 35 of the Interim Agreement between Eastern and Southern African States and the EC; Article 33 of the Agreement between the EU and Viet Nam; Articles 3 and 4 Draft provisions on Trade and Gender Equality in the context of the Modernisation of the EU-Chile Association Agreement; European Commission (2019b), p. 4; European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2015b), p. 6.

  101. 101.

    Article 28 of the negotiated Partnership Agreement between the EU and ACP; Article 4 para 3 (V) Draft provisions on Trade and Gender Equality in the context of the Modernisation of the EU-Chile Association Agreement.

  102. 102.

    European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2021), p. 4; European Commission (2020c), p. 33; European Commission (2020d), p. 37; European Commission (2020f), p. 32.

  103. 103.

    European Commission (2021g), p. 38.

  104. 104.

    European Commission (2020b), p. 15.

  105. 105.

    European Commission (2021c), p. 10; European Commission (2021d), p. 8; European Commission (2021e), p. 5; European Commission (2021f), p. 12; European Commission (2021g), p. 10; European Commission (2021h), p. 8; European Commission (2021i), p. 9; European Commission (2020e), p. 13 and 39; European Commission (2020h), p. 31-32  .

  106. 106.

    European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2021), p. 4; European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2020b), p. 5; European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2018a), p. 5; European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2018b), p. 6.

  107. 107.

    Council of the European Union (2019), p. 3 et seq.

  108. 108.

    European Commission (2020b), p. 18.

  109. 109.

    Council of the European Union (2019), p. 3 et seq; Council of the European Union (2018a), para. 1.

  110. 110.

    Article 17 negotiated partnership Agreement between the EU and ACP.

  111. 111.

    European Commission (2020b), pp. 18–19.

  112. 112.

    European Commission (2020b), p. 19.

  113. 113.

    European Commission (2020b), pp. 19–21.

  114. 114.

    European Commission (2020k), p. 20.

  115. 115.

    See the latest Progress Reports European Commission (2021c), p. 34; European Commission (2021d), p. 31; European Commission (2021e), p. 36; European Commission (2021f), p. 39; European Commission (2021g), p. 39; European Commission (2021h), p. 35; European Commission (2021i), p. 34.

  116. 116.

    European Commission (2019b), p. 14.

  117. 117.

    European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2017b), p. 5.

  118. 118.

    European Commission (2021e), p. 35.

  119. 119.

    European Commission (2021d), p. 31.

  120. 120.

    European Commission (2021g), p. 39.

  121. 121.

    European Commission (2021e), p. 35.

  122. 122.

    European Commission (2021c), p. 34.

  123. 123.

    European Commission (2021f), p. 40.

  124. 124.

    Thies (2020), p. 429.

  125. 125.

    European Commission (2020b), p. 1.

  126. 126.

    Council of the European Union (2013), paras. 1, 8.

  127. 127.

    European Commission (2020d), p. 37; European Commission (2020e), p. 38; European Commission (2020f), p. 32; European Commission (2020i), p. 38 et seq; European Commission (2020k), p. 20; Council of the European Union (2013).

  128. 128.

    European Commission (2021f), p. 38.

  129. 129.

    European Commission (2021f), p. 40.

  130. 130.

    European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2019b), p. 8; European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2018a), pp. 4–5.

  131. 131.

    European Commission (2020b), p. 14.

  132. 132.

    Article 1 of the negotiated Partnership Agreement between the EU and ACP.

  133. 133.

    Article 33 of the negotiated Partnership Agreement between the EU and ACP.

  134. 134.

    Article 36 of the negotiated Partnership Agreement between the EU and ACP.

  135. 135.

    Article 72 of the negotiated Partnership Agreement between the EU and ACP.

  136. 136.

    Article 66 of the negotiated Partnership Agreement between the EU and ACP.

  137. 137.

    See www.spotlightinitiative.org.

  138. 138.

    See https://www.empowerwomen.org/en/projects/we-empower-g7.

  139. 139.

    Council of the European Union (2018b).

  140. 140.

    Council of the European Union (2013), para. 10.

  141. 141.

    Recommendation CM/Rec (2010)5 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on Measures to combat discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity, adopted without a vote on 31 March 2010.

  142. 142.

    Council of the European Union (2013).

  143. 143.

    European Commission (2020k), p. 20.

  144. 144.

    European Commission (2020d), p. 37; European Commission (2020e), p. 38; European Commission (2020f), p. 32; European Commission (2020i), p. 38 et seq; European Commission (2019b), p. 4; European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2018a), p. 5. European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2015b), p. 6. On the GSP+ see European Commission (2018), p. 92 et seq; Council of the European Union (2013), p. 21 et seq.

  145. 145.

    Garcia (2021), p. 285.

  146. 146.

    Thies (2020), p. 447; Kube (2019), p. 226. On the lack of consistency of the EU approach towards human rights see Velluti (2016), p. 41 et seq.

  147. 147.

    Thies (2019), p. 81.

  148. 148.

    Thies (2020), p. 448.

  149. 149.

    Pech and Joelle (2020), p. 334; Velluti (2016), p. 46.

  150. 150.

    Velluti (2016), p. 46; Cannizzaro (2014), p. 1098.

References

  • Atrey S (2019) Intersectional discrimination. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels L (2005) Human Rights conditionality in the EU's International Agreements. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell M (2012) Gender identity and sexual orientation: alternative pathways in EU equality law. Am J Comp Law 60:127–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell M, Waddington L (2021) Similar, Yet Different: the Work-life Balance Directive and the Expanding Frontiers of EU Non-discrimination Law. Common Market Law Rev 58:1401–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burri S, Prechal S (2008) EU gender equality law. Report of the European Commission. Office for Official Publications of the European Union, Luxembourg, pp 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby N (2018) The evolution of gender equality and related employment policies: the case of work–family reconciliation. Int J Discrimination Law 8(2–3):104–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannizzaro E (2014) The EU’s Human Rights Obligations in Relation to Policies with Extraterritorial Effects: a Reply to Lorand Bartels. Eur J Int Law 25:1093–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmel E (2003) What is European and Social about European Social Policy? Some remarks on the open of co-ordination. Paper for ESP Anet Conference Copenhagen 14–17 November

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2008) EU guidelines on violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2013) Guidelines to promote and protect the enjoyment of all human rights by the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) persons

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2018a) Council conclusions on women, peace and security

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2018b) Council conclusions reinforcing the UN-EU strategic partnership on peace operations and crisis management: priorities 2019–2021

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2019) EU Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security (WPS) 2019-2024

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremona M (1996) Human Rights Clauses in the EC’s trade agreements. In: O’Keeffe D, Emiliou N (eds) The European Union and World Trade Law: after the GATT Uruguay Round. Wiley, Chichester, pp 62–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremona M (2011) Values in EU Foreign Policy. In: Evans M, Koutrakos P (eds) Beyond the Established Orders: policy Interconnections between the EU and the Rest of the World. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 275–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremona M (2014) A reticent court?: policy objectives and the Court of Justice. In: Cremona M, Thies A (eds) The European Court of Justice and external relations law: constitutional challenges. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 15–32

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010) Strategy for equality between women and men 2010-2015

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2015a) Guidelines on the analysis of human rights impacts in impact assessments for trade-related policy initiatives

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2015b) List of actions by the Commission to advance LGBTI equality

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2018) Mid-Term Evaluation of the EU’s Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2019a) Serbia 2019 Report Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2019 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2019b) Final Report 2015–2019 on the List of Actions to advance LGBTI equality

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020a) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Union of Equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020–2025

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020b) Joint Communication to the European Council and the Parliament. EU Gender Action Plan (GAP) III – An Ambitious Agenda for Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in EU External Action

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020c) Albania 2020 Report Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2020 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020d) Serbia 2020 Report Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2020 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020e) Turkey 2020 Report Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2020 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020f) North Macedonia 2020 Report Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2020 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020g) Kosovo* 2020 Report Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2020 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020h) Bosnia and Herzegovina 2020 Report Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2020 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020i) Montenegro 2020 Report Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2020 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020j) Final Report 2015–2019 on the List of actions to advance LGBTI equality

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020k) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Union of Equality: LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020–2025

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2021a) European Commission services’ position paper on the sustainability impact assessment in support of negotiations for the trade part of the European Union-Mercosur Association Agreement

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2021b) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. 2021 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2021c) Commission Staff Working Document. Albania 2021 Report Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2021 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2021d) Commission Staff Working Document. Bosnia and Herzegovina 2021 Report Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2021 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2021e) Commission Staff Working Document. Montenegro 2021 Report Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2021 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2021f) Commission Staff Working Document. Turkey 2021 Report Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2021 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2021g) Commission Staff Working Document. Serbia 2021 Report Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2021 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2021h) Commission Staff Working Document. Kosovo 2021 Report Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2021 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2021i) Commission Staff Working Document. North Macedonia 2021 Report Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2021 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2015a) Gender Equality and Women's empowerment: Transforming the Lives of Girls and Women through EU External Relations 2016-2020

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2015b) Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Palestine Progress in 2014 and recommendations for actions Accompanying the document Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committe and the Committee of the Regions. Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2017a) Association Implementation Report on the Republic of Moldova

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2017b) Rapport sur l'état des relations UE-Tunisie dans le cadre de la Politique européenne de voisinage révisée Avril 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2018a) Report on EU-Armenia relations in the framework of the revised ENP

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2018b) Rapport sur l'état des relations UE-Tunisie dans le cadre de la Politique européenne de voisinage révisée

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2018c) Report on EU-Lebanon relations in the framework of the revised ENP (2017-2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2019a) Report on EU - Azerbaijan relations in the framework of the revised European Neighbourhood Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2019b) Report on EU - Jordan relations in the framework of the revised European Neighbourhood Policy (2018-2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2020a) Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Eastern Partnership Policy beyond 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2020b) Rapport sur l'état des relations UE-Algérie dans le cadre de la PEV renouvelée Avril 2018 – Août 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2021) Association Implementation Report on Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2021) The EU Strategy for Gender Equality. European Parliament resolution of 21 January 2021 on the EU Strategy for Gender Equality

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortas A-C (2016) Droits international économique et genre. In: Jänterä-Jareborg M, Tigroudja H (eds) Women’s Human Rights and the Elimination of Discrimination. The Hague Academy of International Law, The Hague, pp 354–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia M (2021) Trade Policy. In: Abels G, Krizsán A, MacRae H, van der Vleuten A (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Gender and EU Politics. Routledge, London, pp 278–289

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guth J, Elfving S (2019) Gender and the Court of Justice of the European Union. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervey TK (2005) Thirty Years of EU Sex Equality Law: Looking Backwards, Looking Forwards. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 12:307–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson D, Maer I (2001) The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance: the Case of Soft Economic Policy Co-ordination. J Common Mark Stud 39:719–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kube V (2019) EU Human Rights, International Investment Law and Participation. Operationalising the EU Foreign Policy Objective to Global Human Rights Protection. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon C (1987) Feminims Unmodified. Discourses on Life and Law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Numhauser-Henning A (2007) EU Sex Equality Law Post-Amsterdam. In: Meenan H (ed) Equality in an Enlarged European Union. Understanding the Article 3 Directives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 145–177

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pech L, Grogan J (2020) EU External Human Rights. In: Wessel RA, Larik J (eds) EU External Relations Law. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 327–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiek D (2007) Broadening the Scope and the Norms of EU Gender Equality Law: towards a Multidimensional Conceptions of Equality Law. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 14:427–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Thies A (2019) The Lisbon Treaty and EU External Relations Law. Accommodating Stakeholders Values, Principles and Objectives. In: Söderstein A (ed) The Lisbon Treaty 10 Years on: Success or Failure? Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, Stockolm, pp 63–89. www.sieps.se/en

    Google Scholar 

  • Thies A (2020) The EU’s Law and Policy Framework for the Promotion of Gender Equality in the World. In: Griegerich T (ed) The European Union as Protector and Promoter of Equality. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 429–454

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly Resolution (2015) A/RES/70/1, 29 September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) S/RES/1325, 31 October 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Velluti S (2016) The Promotion and Integration of Human Rights in EU External Trade Relations. Utrecht J Int Eur Law 32:41–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon-Johns M (2021) EU work-family policies revisited: Finally challenging caring roles? Eur Labour Law J 12(3):301–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Evola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Evola, M. (2023). The Fight Against Discrimination on the Grounds of Sex, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the External Relations of the European Union. In: Krstić, I., Evola, M., Ribes Moreno, M.I. (eds) Legal Issues of International Law from a Gender Perspective . Gender Perspectives in Law, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13459-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13459-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13458-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13459-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics