Abstract
W.E.B. Du Bois successfully organized a sociological research lab in turn-of-the-twentieth-century Atlanta. By examining his practice as a research organizer, as well as the philosophical principles which undergirded much of his scientific work, we can draw lessons about how to solve pressing problems of social epistemology—that is to say, problems with how we produce and disseminate knowledge through collective inquiry. Many of the problems we deal with in contemporary science are caused by problems in our institutional or incentive structures. For instance, we do not sufficiently replicate past work in large part because we have not organized scientific inquiry so as to encourage this. The lessons Du Bois may teach us can thus speak directly to contemporary issues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For a detailed discussion of the mediate and immediate aims of science, see Bright (2018, §3).
- 2.
- 3.
Du Bois was a lifelong pan-Africanist, and it is also important to place his work in the context of broader trends in African thought that may have exercised influence on his work.
References
Avin, Shahar. 2015. Breaking the Grant Cycle: On the Rational Allocation of Public Resources to Scientific Research Projects. PhD diss., University of Cambridge.
———. 2018. Policy Considerations for Random Allocation of Research Funds. RT. A Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation 6 (1): 1.
———. 2019. Mavericks and Lotteries. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 76: 13–23.
Battle-Baptiste, Witney, and Britt Rusert, eds. 2018. W.E.B. Du Bois’s Data Portraits: Visualizing Black America. Hudson, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
Bernal, J.D. 1949. The Freedom of Necessity. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bright, Liam Kofi. 2018. Du Bois’ Democratic Defence of the Value Free Ideal. Synthese 195 (5): 2227–2245.
———. 2022. Ida B. Wells-Barnett’s The Red Record. In Neglected Classics of Philosophy, II, ed. Eric Schliesser. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190097196.003.0009
Brown, Mark B. 2009. Science in Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dang, Haixin. 2019. Do Collaborators in Science Need to Agree? Philosophy of Science 86 (5): 1029–1040.
Douglas, Heather. 2017. Science, Values, and Citizens. In Eppur Si Muove: Doing History and Philosophy of Science with Peter Machamer, ed. Marcus P. Adams, Zvi Biener, Uljana Feest, and Jacqueline A. Sullivan, 83–96. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Du Bois, W.E.B. 1898. The study of the Negro problems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1: 1–23.
———. 1899. The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
———. [1903] 1994. “The Sorrow Songs” In The Souls of Black Folk. New York: Dover.
———. [1905] 2000. “Sociology Hesitant.” Boundary 2 27 (3): 37–44
———., ed. 1906a. The Health and Physique of the Negro American. No. 11. Atlanta: Atlanta University Press.
———. 1906b. The Economic Future of the Negro. Publications of the American Economic Association 7 (1): 219–242.
———. [1940] 2007. Dusk of Dawn: An Essay Towards an Autobiography of a Race Concept. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. [1944] 1990. “My Evolving Program for Negro Freedom.” Clinical Sociology Review 8 (1): 5.
Grim, Patrick, Daniel J. Singer, Aaron Bramson, Bennett Holman, Sean McGeehan, and William J. Berger. 2019. Diversity, Ability, and Expertise in Epistemic Communities. Philosophy of Science 86 (1): 98–123.
Heesen, Remco. 2017. Academic Superstars: Competent or Lucky? Synthese 194 (11): 4499–4518.
———. 2018. Why the Reward Structure of Science Makes Reproducibility Problems Inevitable. The Journal of Philosophy 115 (12): 661–674.
Heesen, Remco, and Jan-Willem Romeijn. 2019. Epistemic Diversity and Editor Decisions: A Statistical Matthew Effect. Philosophers' Imprint 19 (39): 1.
Heesen, Remco, Liam Kofi Bright, and Andrew Zucker. 2019. Vindicating Methodological Triangulation. Synthese 196 (8): 3067–3308.
Holman, Bennett, and Kevin C. Elliott. 2018. The Promise and Perils of Industry-Funded Science. Philosophy Compass 13 (11): e12544.
Kitcher, Philip. 2003. Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2009. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kummerfeld, Erich, and Kevin J.S. Zollman. 2015. Conservatism and the Scientific State of Nature. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 1057–1076.
Lamont, Michèle. 2009. How Professors Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lee, Carole J. 2015. Commensuration Bias in Peer Review. Philosophy of Science 82 (5): 1272–1283.
Machery, Edouard. 2020. What is a Replication? Philosophy of Science 87 (4): 545–567.
Morris, Aldon. 2017. The Scholar Denied: W.E.B. Du Bois and the Birth of Modern Sociology. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Munafò, Marcus R., and George Davey Smith. 2018. Robust Research Needs Many Lines of Evidence. Nature 553 (7689): 399–401.
Neurath, Otto. 1946. The Orchestration of the Sciences by the Encyclopedism of Logical Empiricism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6 (4): 496–508.
Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Science 349 (6251): aac4716-1–aac4716-8.
Romero, Felipe. 2018. Who Should Do Replication Labor? Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (4): 516–537.
Tamblyn, Robyn, Nadyne Girard, Christina J. Qian, and James Hanley. 2018. Assessment of Potential Bias in Research Grant Peer Review in Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal 190 (16): E489–E499.
Winsberg, Eric, Bryce Huebner, and Rebecca Kukla. 2014. Accountability and Values in Radically Collaborative Research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 46: 16–23.
Weatherall, James Owen, Cailin O’Connor, and Justin P. Bruner. 2020. How to Beat Science and Influence People: Policymakers and Propaganda in Epistemic Networks. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (4): 1157–1186.
Wright II, Earl. 2017. The First American School of Sociology: W.E.B. Du Bois and the Atlanta Sociological Laboratory. London: Routledge.
Zollman, Kevin J.S. 2018. The Credit Economy and the Economic Rationality of Science. The Journal of Philosophy 115 (1): 5–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bright, L.K. (2023). Du Bois on the Centralized Organization of Science. In: Griffioen, A.L., Backmann, M. (eds) Pluralizing Philosophy’s Past. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13405-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13405-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13404-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13405-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)