Skip to main content

Misunderstanding Psychoanalysis from the Left

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
(Mis)Understanding Freud with Lacan, Zizek, and Neuroscience

Part of the book series: The Palgrave Lacan Series ((PALS))

  • 351 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the book Intersectionality and Psychoanalysis to explore the conflict between identity politics and psychoanalytic practice. My main argument is that psychoanalytic treatment is centered on the neutrality of the analyst and the free association of the patient, and this open discourse is narrowed and limited by a concern for issues concerning race, gender, and class. The main point is not to dismiss these vital social influences; instead, I hope to show how any and every social factor can be voiced in the analytic process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Belkin, Max, and Cleonie White, eds. Intersectionality and relational psychoanalysis: New perspectives on race, gender, and sexuality. Routledge, 2020.

  2. 2.

    Freud, Sigmund. On the universal tendency to debasement in the sphere of love. Read Books Ltd, 2014.

  3. 3.

    Samuels, Robert. “Pathos, Hysteria, and the Left.” Zizek and the Rhetorical Unconscious. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2020. 33–47.

  4. 4.

    Ryan, William. Blaming the victim. Vol. 226. Vintage, 1976.

  5. 5.

    Merrill, Roberto, and Daniel Weinstock. Political Neutrality: A Re-evaluation. Springer, 2014.

  6. 6.

    Israëls, Han, and Morton Schatzman. “The seduction theory.” History of Psychiatry 4.13 (1993): 23–59.

  7. 7.

    Esterson, Allen. “Jeffrey Masson and Freud’s seduction theory: a new fable based on old myths.” History of the Human Sciences 11.1 (1998): 1–21.

  8. 8.

    Ferro, Antonino. Seeds of illness, seeds of recovery: The genesis of suffering and the role of psychoanalysis. Routledge, 2004.

  9. 9.

    Franklin, Girard. “The multiple meanings of neutrality.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 38.1 (1990): 195–220.

  10. 10.

    Boothby, Richard. Death and Desire (RLE: Lacan): Psychoanalytic Theory in Lacan’s Return to Freud. Routledge, 2014.

  11. 11.

    Smith, Joseph, H. “Ego psychology and the language of Lacan: transference and affect.” Psychoanalysis and contemporary thought 14.1 (1991): 143–182.

  12. 12.

    Ian, Marcia. “Freud, Lacan, and imaginary secularity.” American Imago 54.2 (1997): 123–147.

  13. 13.

    Caudill, D. ““Lacan’s social psychoanalysis”.” The Subject of Lacan Eds K Malone, S Friedlander (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) pp (2000): 297–315.

  14. 14.

    Johnson, Barbara. The feminist difference: Literature, psychoanalysis, race, and gender. Harvard University Press, 1998.

  15. 15.

    Gerson, Samuel. “Neutrality, resistance, and self-disclosure in an intersubjective psychoanalysis.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues6.5 (1996): 623–645.

  16. 16.

    Guralnik, Orna. “Sleeping dogs: Psychoanalysis and the socio-political.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues 26.6 (2016): 655–663.

  17. 17.

    Flax, Jane. Disputed subjects: Essays on psychoanalysis, politics and philosophy. Routledge, 2012.

  18. 18.

    Rozmarin, Eyal. “Better identity politics.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues 20.2 (2010): 181–190.

  19. 19.

    Grinberg, León, and Rebeca Grinberg. “The problem of identity and the psychoanalytical process.” International Review of Psycho-Analysis 1 (1974): 499–507.

  20. 20.

    Akhtar, Salman. Immigration and identity: Turmoil, treatment, and transformation. Jason Aronson, 1999.

  21. 21.

    Jekels, Ludwig, and Edmund Bergler. “Transference and love.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 18.3 (1949): 325–350.

  22. 22.

    Kohut, Heinz. How does analysis cure?. University of Chicago Press, 2009.

  23. 23.

    Schneider, Stanley. “Transference, counter-transference, projective identification and role responsiveness in the supervisory process.” The Clinical Supervisor 10.2 (1993): 71–84.

  24. 24.

    Wilson, Mitchell. “The analyst’s desire and the problem of narcissistic resistances.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 51.1 (2003): 71–99.

  25. 25.

    Dervin, Daniel. “Where Freud was, there Lacan shall be: Lacan and the fate of transference.” American Imago 54.4 (1997): 347–375.

  26. 26.

    Rodriguez, Leonardo, and Silvia Rodriguez. “On the transference.” Analysis 1 (1989): 165–185.

  27. 27.

    Shill, Merton A. “Analytic neutrality, anonymity, abstinence, and elective self-disclosure.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 52.1 (2004): 151–187.

  28. 28.

    Lynn, David J., and George E. Vaillant. “Anonymity, neutrality, and confidentiality in the actual methods of Sigmund Freud: A review of 43 cases, 1907–1939.” American Journal of Psychiatry 155.2 (1998): 163–171.

  29. 29.

    Ivey, Gavin. “Transference-counter-transference constellations and enactments in the psychotherapy of destructive narcissism.” British journal of medical psychology 72.1 (1999): 63–74.

  30. 30.

    Böhm, Tomas. “Inner and outer frame breaks— Counter-transference, enactments and whose life history?.” The Scandinavian psychoanalytic review 27.1 (2004): 2–11.

  31. 31.

    Khoury, Maurice. “The desire of the analyst and counter-transference: from the mirroring analyst to the desiring analyst.” The Lacan Tradition. Routledge, 2018. 189–206.

  32. 32.

    Australian Centre for Psychoanalysis. “The Position of the Analyst in the Transference.” Analysis 4 (1993): 91–96.

  33. 33.

    Alvarez, Anne. “Problems in the use of the counter-transference: Getting it across.” Journal of Child Psychotherapy 9.1 (1983): 7–23.

  34. 34.

    Frosh, Stephen. “Psychoanalysis, identity and citizenship.” Culture and citizenship (2001): 62–73.

  35. 35.

    Samuels, Robert. “The Resistances to Psychoanalysis and Global Progress.” Freud for the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Pivot, Cham, 2019. 53–67.

  36. 36.

    Rabinovich, Diana. “What is a Lacanian clinic?.” The Cambridge Companion to Lacan (2003): 208.

  37. 37.

    Mills, Jon. “Lacan on paranoiac knowledge.” Psychoanalytic Psychology 20.1 (2003): 30.

  38. 38.

    Heath, Chip, and Dan Heath. “The curse of knowledge.” Harvard Business Review 84.12 (2006): 20–23.

  39. 39.

    Moraitis, George. “The couch as a protective shield for the analyst.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 15.3 (1995): 406–412.

  40. 40.

    Hamburg, Paul. “Interpretation and empathy: reading Lacan with Kohut.” International journal of psycho-analysis 72 (1991): 347–361.

  41. 41.

    Lacan, Jacques, Alan Sheridan, and Malcolm Bowie. “Aggressivity in psychoanalysis.” Ecrits. Routledge, 2020. 9–32.

  42. 42.

    Owens, Carol, and Stephanie Swales. Psychoanalysing ambivalence with Freud and Lacan: On and off the Couch. Routledge, 2019.

  43. 43.

    Samuels, Robert. “Beyond Hillary Clinton: Obsessional Narcissism and the Failure of the Liberal Class.” Psychoanalyzing the Left and Right after Donald Trump. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2016. 31–59.

  44. 44.

    Samuels, Robert. “Transference and Narcissism.” Freud for the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Pivot, Cham, 2019. 43–51.

  45. 45.

    Natanson, Maurice. “Jean-Paul Sartre’s Philosophy of Freedom.” Literature, Philosophy, and the Social Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht, 1962. 62–75.

  46. 46.

    Fayek, Ahmed. “Narcissism and the death instinct.” International journal of psycho-analysis 62 (1981): 309–322.

  47. 47.

    Fayek, Ahmed. “Narcissism and the death instinct.” International journal of psycho-analysis 62 (1981): 309–322.

  48. 48.

    Sampson, Edward E. “Identity politics: Challenges to psychology’s understanding.” American psychologist 48.12 (1993): 1219.

  49. 49.

    Miller, Jacques-Alain, ed. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book 1: Freud’s Papers on Technique 1953-1954. CUP Archive, 1988.

  50. 50.

    Samuels, Robert. “Pathos, Hysteria, and the Left.” Zizek and the Rhetorical Unconscious. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2020. 33–47.

  51. 51.

    Freud, Sigmund. “‘A child is being beaten’a contribution to the study of the origin of sexual perversions.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XVII (1917-1919): An Infantile Neurosis and Other Works. 1955. 175–204.

  52. 52.

    Cole, Alyson Manda. The cult of true victimhood: From the war on welfare to the war on terror. Stanford University Press, 2007.

  53. 53.

    Burke, Walter F. “Countertransference disclosure and the asymmetry/mutuality dilemma.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues 2.2 (1992): 241–271.

  54. 54.

    Braunstein, Néstor. “Desire and Jouissance in the Teachings of Lacan.” The Cambridge Companion to Lacan (2003): 102–115.

  55. 55.

    Basch, Michael F. “Affect and the analyst.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 3.4 (1983): 691–703.

  56. 56.

    Kohut, Heinz. “The psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders: Outline of a systematic approach.” The psychoanalytic study of the child 23.1 (1968): 86–113.

  57. 57.

    Kernberg, Otto, F. “Further contributions to the treatment of narcissistic personalities.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 55 (1974): 215–240.

  58. 58.

    Lacan, Jacques, Alan Sheridan, and Malcolm Bowie. “The Direction of the Treatment and the Principles of its Power 1.” Écrits. Routledge, 2020. 250–310.

  59. 59.

    Freud, Sigmund. “Three essays on the theory of sexuality (1905).” The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, volume VII (1901-1905): A case of hysteria, three essays on sexuality and other works. 1953. 123–246.

  60. 60.

    Hekman, Susan. “Beyond identity: Feminism, identity and identity politics.” Feminist Theory 1.3 (2000): 289–308.

  61. 61.

    Bondi, Liz. “Locating identity politics.” Place and the Politics of Identity. Routledge, 2004. 89–106.

  62. 62.

    Samuels, Robert. “The Resistances to Psychoanalysis and Global Progress.” Freud for the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Pivot, Cham, 2019. 53–67.

  63. 63.

    Jarach, Lawrence. “Essentialism and the problem of identity politics.” The Anarchist Library (2004).

  64. 64.

    Samuels, Robert. “Logos, global justice, and the reality principle.” Zizek and the rhetorical unconscious. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2020. 65–86.

  65. 65.

    Pagden, Anthony. The Enlightenment: and why it still matters. Oxford University Press, 2013.

  66. 66.

    Samuels, Robert. “Pathos, Hysteria, and the Left.” Zizek and the Rhetorical Unconscious. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2020. 33–47.

  67. 67.

    Dimen, Muriel. “The third step: Freud, the feminists, and postmodernism.” The American Journal of Psychoanalysis 55.4 (1995): 303–319.

  68. 68.

    Chatterjee, Angana. “The Plausibility of a Feminist Philosopher’s Take on Freudian Analysis.” Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 32.2 (2015): 227–237.

  69. 69.

    Samuels, Robert. “Pathos, Hysteria, and the Left.” Zizek and the Rhetorical Unconscious. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2020. 33–47.

  70. 70.

    Nock, Christopher John. “Equal freedom and unequal property: a critique of Nozick’s libertarian case.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 25.4 (1992): 677–695.

  71. 71.

    Bridge, Gary. “Rationality, ethics, and space: On situated universalism and the self-interested acknowledgement of ‘difference’.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18.4 (2000): 519–535.

  72. 72.

    Samuels, Robert. “Logos, global justice, and the reality principle.” Zizek and the rhetorical unconscious. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2020. 65–86.

  73. 73.

    Frosh, Stephen. “Facing political truths.” Psychotherapy and Politics International 5.1 (2007): 29–36.

  74. 74.

    Samuels, Robert. “Global solidarity and global government: The universal subject of psychoanalysis and democracy.” Psychoanalyzing the left and right after Donald Trump. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2016. 77–101.

  75. 75.

    Colman, Warren. “Imagination and the imaginary.” Journal of Analytical Psychology 51.1 (2006): 21–41.

  76. 76.

    Cooper, Seiso Paul. Zen insight, psychoanalytic action: Two arrows meeting. Routledge, 2018.

  77. 77.

    Lothane, Henry Zvi. “Free association as the foundation of the psychoanalytic method and psychoanalysis as a historical science.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 38.6 (2018): 416–434.

  78. 78.

    Moncayo, Raul. Evolving Lacanian perspectives for clinical psychoanalysis: On narcissism, sexuation, and the phases of analysis in contemporary culture. Routledge, 2018.

  79. 79.

    Stevens, Alexandre. “Lacanian interpretation.” Hurly-Burly: The International Lacanian Journal of Psychoanalysis 1 (2009): 57–59.

  80. 80.

    Diatkine, Gilbert. “Lacan.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 88.3 (2007): 643–660.

  81. 81.

    Skelton, Ross. “Lacan for the faint hearted.” British Journal of Psychotherapy 10.3 (1994): 419–429.

  82. 82.

    Parker, Ian. Lacanian psychoanalysis: Revolutions in subjectivity. Routledge, 2010.

  83. 83.

    Harman, Gilbert. “What is moral relativism?.” Values and morals. Springer, Dordrecht, 1978. 143–161.

  84. 84.

    Bass, Jeffrey D. In exile from the self: Identity, politics, and psychoanalysis in Buenos Aires. University of California, San Diego, 2000.

  85. 85.

    Bowker, Matthew H. “Analytical and Political Neutrality: Change, Privilege, and Responsibility.” Free Associations 71 (2018): 1–17.

  86. 86.

    Hoffer, Axel. “Toward a definition of psychoanalytic neutrality.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 33.4 (1985): 771–795.

  87. 87.

    Parker, Ian. “Jacques Lacan, barred psychologist.” Theory & Psychology 13.1 (2003): 95–115.

  88. 88.

    Kandel, Eric. The age of insight: The quest to understand the unconscious in art, mind, and brain, from Vienna 1900 to the present. Random House, 2012.

  89. 89.

    Johnston, Adrian. “Analytic Action.” Irrepressible Truth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2017. 151–168.

  90. 90.

    Samuels, Robert. “Trump and Sanders on the Couch: Neoliberal Populism on the Left and the Right.” Psychoanalyzing the left and right after Donald Trump. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2016. 61–76.

  91. 91.

    Adler, Elliot, and Janet L. Bachant. “Free Associatioan and Analytic Neutraltity: Basic Structure of the Psychoanalytic Situation.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 44.4 (1996): 1021–1046.

  92. 92.

    Miller, Jacques-Alain. “A Reading of Some Details in Television in dialogue with the audience.” Newsletter of the Freudian Field 4.1 (1990): 24–29.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Samuels, R. (2022). Misunderstanding Psychoanalysis from the Left. In: (Mis)Understanding Freud with Lacan, Zizek, and Neuroscience. The Palgrave Lacan Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13327-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics