Skip to main content

Islam, Political Governance, and Secularism: Examining a Fraught Relationship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Secularism in Comparative Perspective

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations ((PPCE,volume 23))

  • 184 Accesses

Abstract

This essay delves into Sunni interpretations of the Qur’an that attempt to derive a political system based on scripture, and make it a priority for Muslims to establish one. Within this narrative, religion and state go hand-in-hand. However, Afsaruddin argues that these interpretations have little to do with the Qur’an or with the historical reality of the early Islamic period. In this essay, Afsaruddin analyzes the theories of ‘Abd al-Raziq, a key thinker from the early twentieth century who argued for a separation between religion and politics based on his reading of the Qur’an and hadith (the reported statements of the Prophet Muhammad). Afsaruddin offers an analysis of these debates regarding governance, and how these arguments among Sunni Muslims remain influential to this day.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This essay is an abbreviation and adaptation of my chapter “Islam and Politics” in Asma Afsaruddin, Contemporary Issues in Islam (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2015), 54-85.

  2. 2.

    For an insightful critique of a number of these positions and replacing them with a more historically nuanced and sophisticated reading of the sources, see Hayrettin Yucesoy, “Justification of Political Authority in Medieval Sunni Thought,” in Islam, the State, and Political Authority: Medieval Issues and Modern Concerns, ed. Asma Afsaruddin (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 9-33. Cf. also Aziz al-Azmeh, “God’s Caravan: Topoi and Schemata in the History of Muslim Political Thought,” in Mirror for the Muslim Prince: Islam and the Theory of Statecraft, ed. Mehrzad Boroujerdi (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2013), 326-397.

  3. 3.

    See this discussion in Asma Afsaruddin, “Obedience to Political Authority: An Evolutionary Concept,” in Islamic Democratic Discourse: Theory, Debates, and Directions, ed. Muqtedar Khan (Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books, 2006), 37-60.

  4. 4.

    For a comprehensive discussion of these variegated trends within political Islam, see Mohammed Ayoob, The Many Faces of Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Muslim World (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2007), esp. 64 ff.

  5. 5.

    For the full report titled “Most Muslims Want Democracy, Personal Freedoms, and Islam in Political Life,” see http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2012/07/Pew-Global-Attitudes-Project-Arab-Spring-Report-FINAL-Tuesday-July-10-2012.pdf

  6. 6.

    For a useful discussion of this crisis over the caliphate, along with a synopsis of ‘Abd al-Raziq’s views, see Hamid Enayat, Modern Islamic Political Thought (Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust, 2001), 78-103.

  7. 7.

    ‘Ali ‘Abd al-Raziq, al-Islam wa-usul al-hukm (Beirut: Dar Maktabat al-Hayat, 1966), 113.

  8. 8.

    Ibid., 113-14.

  9. 9.

    Ibid., 114.

  10. 10.

    Ibid., 118-19.

  11. 11.

    Ibid., 119-21.

  12. 12.

    Ibid., 123-25.

  13. 13.

    Ibid., 136-42.

  14. 14.

    Ibid., 144-45.

  15. 15.

    Ibid., 146-50.

  16. 16.

    Ibid., 150-52.

  17. 17.

    The relevant part of the verse reads, “If God had so willed, he would have made you a single community, but [His plan is] to test you in what He has given you, so hasten to do good!”

  18. 18.

    ‘Abd al-Raziq, Islam wa-usul, 155.

  19. 19.

    Ibid., 200-01.

  20. 20.

    Muhammad Bakhit al-Muti‘i, Haqiqat al-Islam wa-usul al-hukm (al-Matba`ah al-Salafiyah, 1960), 4.

  21. 21.

    Ibid., 4-5.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., 23-24.

  23. 23.

    Ibid., 24-25.

  24. 24.

    Ibid., 25-26.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., 293-95.

  26. 26.

    Al-Muti‘i is clearly construing the verb tahkum to mean “rule” in the political sense rather than “judge,” which is the usual sense of the word, particularly in the Qur’anic context.

  27. 27.

    Ibid., 296-98.

  28. 28.

    Jacques Derrida, Rogues: Two Essays on Reason, trans. Michael Naas and Pascale-Anne Brault (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005), 28-29.

  29. 29.

    Such a belief was notably articulated by Bernard Lewis who, after the Twin Tower attacks, remarked ominously to an interviewer: “I have no doubt that September 11 was the opening salvo of the final battle [between Islam and the West];” see Michael Hirsh, “Bernard Lewis Revisited: What if Islam isn’t an Obstacle to Democracy in the Middle East but the secret to achieving it?” in the Washington Monthly (November 2004), 14.

  30. 30.

    Alfred Stepan, “The World’s Religious Systems and Democracy: Crafting the ‘Twin Tolerations’,” in his Arguing Comparative Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).

  31. 31.

    Nader Hashemi, Islam, Secularism, and Liberal Democracy: Towards a Democratic Theory for Muslim Societies (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).

  32. 32.

    Ahmet T. Kuru, Secularism and State Policies toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).

  33. 33.

    Hashemi, Islam, 4.

  34. 34.

    For these detailed findings, see John L. Esposito and Dalia Mogahed, Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think (New York: Gallup Press, 2007), 29-63.

  35. 35.

    Robert Inglehart and Pippa Norris, “The True Clash of Civilizations,” Foreign Policy 135 (2001): 62-70.

  36. 36.

    Amaney Jamal and Mark Tessler, “The Democracy Barometers: Attitudes in the Arab World,” The Journal of Democracy 19 (2008): 97-110. These countries included Morocco, Kuwait, Jordan, and Algeria.

Works Cited

  • ‘Abd al-Raziq, ‘Ali. 1966. [al-Islam wa-usul al-hukm] Beirut: Dar Maktabat al-Hayat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afsaruddin, Asma. 2006. Obedience to Political Authority: An Evolutionary Concept. In Islamic Democratic Discourse: Theory, Debates, and Directions, ed. Muqtedar Khan, 37–60. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Islam and Politics. In Contemporary Issues in Islam, 54–85. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • al-Azmeh, Aziz. 2013. God’s Caravan: Topoi and Schemata in the History of Muslim Political Thought. In Mirror for the Muslim Prince: Islam and the Theory of Statecraft, ed. Mehrzad Boroujerdi, 326–397. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • al-Muti‘i, Muhammad Bakhit. 1960. Haqiqat al-Islam wa-usul al-hukm. al-Matba`ah al-Salafiyah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoob, Mohammed. 2007. The Many Faces of Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Muslim World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 2005. Rogues: Two Essays on Reason. Translated by Michael Naas and Pascale-Anne Brault. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enayat, Hamid and Hamid Algar. 2001. Modern Islamic Political Thought : The Response of the Shīʻī and Sunnī Muslims to the Twentieth Century. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, John and Dalia Mogahed. 2007. Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think. New York: Gallup Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi, Nader. 2009. Islam, Secularism, and Liberal Democracy: Towards a Democratic Theory for Muslim Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, Michael. 2004. Bernard Lewis Revisited: What if Islam isn’t an Obstacle to Democracy in the Middle East but the secret to achieving it?. Washington Monthly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Robert and Pippa Norris. 2001. The True Clash of Civilizations. Foreign Policy 135: 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, Amaney and Mark Tessler. 2008. The Democracy Barometers: Attitudes in the Arab World. The Journal of Democracy 19: 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuru, Ahmet T. 2009. Secularism and State Policies toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stepan, Alfred. 2001. The World’s Religious Systems and Democracy: Crafting the ‘Twin Tolerations. In Arguing Comparative Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yucesoy, Hayrettin. 2011. Justification of Political Authority in Medieval Sunni Thought. In Islam, the State, and Political Authority: Medieval Issues and Modern Concerns, ed. Asma Afsaruddin, 9–33. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asma Afsaruddin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Afsaruddin, A. (2023). Islam, Political Governance, and Secularism: Examining a Fraught Relationship. In: Laurence, J. (eds) Secularism in Comparative Perspective. Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13310-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics