Skip to main content

The Metascientific Approaches to Montology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Montology Palimpsest

Part of the book series: Montology ((M,volume 1))

  • 239 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to determine selected issues, topics, and research approaches about the nature of montology. It requires an adequate approach of individual scientific disciplines to formulate the research object, goal, and approaches and, ultimately, the authenticity and identity of montology itself. This is the task of metascientific superstructure: its epistemology as means of metamontology, as the science about montology. Its mission is to generalize the results of montological research into certain regularities and laws. In addition, the metascientific approach contributes to the definition of montology and its position and collaboration with other scientific disciplines.

We rely on experience obtained from many years of metascientific research of landscape ecology, lying at the intersection of geography and ecology. Thus, it was possible to build a consistent foundation of meta-landscape ecology as a new ecological discipline. We have selected important metascientific aspects of landscape ecology with its intra-, inter-, and transdisciplinary approaches. The generalized statement of knowledge and experience of meta-landscape ecological research, tested on the example of several scientific disciplines, allows us to apply them to outline future developments of montology. The understandings of montology are not isolated but interconnected by the flow of information and knowledge about its entities, structures, and principles, thus creating a certain system. For a deeper metascientific understanding of the concept and nature of montology, it is necessary to know its scientific-structural, content-conceptual, and scale-conceptual development. The current palimpsest of the mountainscape and montology is the result of overlapping and reflection of structures and features of the temporal-spatial layers of genetic, functional, and physiognomic development. The development of mountain research and montology represents, from a metascientific point of view, interconnected study issues. In this way, the mountainscape can currently be understood as a holistic and complex system research object. Its concepts are fluctuating due to the relatively young age, complexity, and wide range of research issues, topics, approaches, and scientists. From the metascientific point of view, the nature of the research approach of montology can be considered as a mixed intra-, inter-, multi-, and transdisciplinary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amoroso, R. L. (1999). An introduction to noetic field theory: The quantization of mind. Noetic Journal, 2(1), 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsdorf, A., & Haller, A. (2020). Urban montology: Mountain cities as transdisciplinary research focus. In F. O. Sarmiento & L. M. Frolich (Eds.), The Elgar companion to geography, and sustainability (pp. 140–154). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, S. (1988). The future value of the “verticality” concept: Implications and possible applications in the Andes. In N. J. R. Allan, G. Knapp, & C. Stadel (Eds.), Human impact on mountains. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, A., & Branca, D. (2020). Montología: una perspectiva de montaña hacia la investigación transdisciplinaria y el desarrollo sustentable. Revista de Investigaciones Altoandinas, 22(4), 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herod, A. (2010). Scale: Key ideas in geography (312 p). Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ives, J. D., & Messerli, B. (1999). Progress in theoretical and applied mountain research, 1973-1989, and major future needs. Mountain Research and Development., 10(2), 101–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremsa, V. (1999a). Mountain landscape ecology information system. In “Sustainable Mountain Development”, Proceedings of III International Symposium. Quito, Ecuador, Dec 9–14, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremsa, V. (1999b). Estrategias para desarrollo sustentable del paisaje rural en las montańas (Strategies for Sustainable Development of Rural Landscape in the Mountains). In “Sustainable Mountain Development”, Proceedings of III International Symposium. Quito, Ecuador, Dec 9–14, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremsa, V. (2000). The role of scale in monitoring tropical forest from space. In T. Zawila-Niedzwiecki (Ed.), Remote sensing and forest monitoring. Proceedings of the 4.02.05 Group Session “Remote sensing and world forest monitoring” held within IUFRO XXI world congress on “Forests and society: The role of research”, 7–12 August 2000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (pp. 33–48). IGIK Institute of Geodesy and Cartography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremsa, V. (2001). Typology of Mountain Forested Landscapes in Mexico. Primer Congreso Nacional de Geomática, 26–28 de septiembre 2001, Guanajuato, Gto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremsa, V. (2002). Montane forested landscapes in Mexico. In International Workshop Carpathian Upper Mountain Forests, Kostryno, Ukraine, 26–29 April 2002, Uzhorod National University; National Academy of Sciences (Institute of Ecology), Uzhansky National Nature Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremsa, V., & Varela, S. (2000a). Mapping Mexico’s mountain forests (case study). In M. Price & N. Butt (Eds.), Forests in sustainable mountain development: A state-of-knowledge report for 2000. Task force on forests in sustainable mountain development (IUFRO research series 5) (pp. 9–12). CABI Publishing & IUFRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremsa, V., & Varela, S. (2000b). Mountain forest landscapes in Mexico. In Living With Diversity: 29th International Geographical Congress, 14–18 August 2000, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremsa, V., & Žigrai, F. (2021a). Landscape ecology in Mexico: evolution, research, education and future (selected theoretical and meta-scientific aspects). Journal of Landscape Ecology, 14(2), 82–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremsa, V., & Žigrai, F. (2021b). Meta-landscape ecology approach to determine the nature of Mexican landscape ecology (selected meta-scientific aspects). In Symposium “New Landscape Ecology Horizons”. IALE-North America Annual Conference 2021, University of Nevada, Reno, USA, April 12–16, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C. D. (2014). Exploring spatial scale in geography (272 p). Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. (2016). History, historicity and science. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Messerli, B., & Ives, J. D. (1997). Mountains of the world: A global priority. Parthenon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montévil, M. (2020). Historicity at the heart of biology. Theory in biosciences. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarmiento, F. O. (2000). Breaking mountain paradigms: Ecological effects on human impacts in managed tropandean landscapes. AMBIO: Journal of the Human Environment, 29(7), 423–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmiento, F. O. (2020a). Packing transdisciplinary critical geography amidst sustainability of mountainscapes. In The Elgar companion to geography, transdisciplinarity and sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmiento, F. O. (2020b). Montology manifesto: Echoes towards a transdisciplinary science of mountains. Journal of Mountain Science, 17(10), 2512–2527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmiento, F. O., Oliva-Cruz, S. M., & Fernandez-Güimac, S. L. (2020). Montology: A transformative frame for the future of education about mountains. Mountain Research and Development, 40(4), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaymaker, O. (2007). The potential contribution of geomorphology to tropical mountain development: The case of the MANRECUR project. Geomorphology, 87(1–2), 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tally, R. T., Jr. (2012). Spatiality (180 p). Taylor & Francis Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueno, K., Balsiger, J. & Price, M. F. (2020). Education for sustainable mountain development: Preliminary insights from a web-based survey of opportunities. Mountain Research and Development, 40(4), R1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience among the great branches of learning. Daedalus, 127(1), 131–149.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1999). Consilience the unity of knowledge (384 p). Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žigrai, F. (1997). Dimensions of cultural landscape: theoretical, methodical and application aspects. In L. Miklos (Ed.), Proceedings from the II international conference (pp. 42–45). UNESCO-Chair for Ecological Awareness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žigrai, F. (2001). Position, meaning and tasks of meta-landscape ecology. (Some theoretical and methodological remarks). Ekologia (Bratislava), 20, 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žigrai, F. (2003). The meaning of meta-landscape ecology for the development of the theory, methodology, application and education of the landscape ecology (selected aspects). Ekologia (Bratislava), 22(Sup.1), 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žigrai, F. (2007). Contribution of metascience to the development of landscape ecology. In Landscape ecology in Slovakia (development, current state and perspectives) (pp. 38–53). Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic; Slovak Association for Landscape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žigrai, F. (2010). Landscape ecology in theory and practice (selected theoretical and meta-scientific aspects). Ekológia (Bratislava), 29(3), 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žigrai, F. (2012). Social-scientific relevance of landscape ecology as the reflection of its theoretical-applied and educational development. Ekologia (Bratislava), 31(2), 168–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žigrai, F. (2013). Transfer of landscape ecological knowledge from theory to practice as a multi-stage process (theoretical and meta-scientific aspects). Ekologia (Bratislava), 32(3), 305–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žigrai, F. (2015). Preservation of authenticity and determination of identity of landscape ecology as one prerequisite of its future development (selected theoretical and meta-scientific aspects). Ekologia (Bratislava), 34(2), 186–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žigrai, F. (2016). Time-spatial contextuality, complexity, and integrity of the development and cognition of landscape ecology (selected theoretical and metascientific aspects). Landscape Ecology, 9(3), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žigrai, F. (2022). Meta-landscape ecology as a new ecological discipline (570 p). Prešov University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kremsa, V.Š., Žigrai, F. (2022). The Metascientific Approaches to Montology. In: Sarmiento, F.O. (eds) Montology Palimpsest. Montology, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13298-8_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13298-8_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13297-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13298-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics