Abstract
Reduction of pesticides use is one of the main objectives of the Farm to Fork Strategy developed in the framework of the European Green Deal, aiming to make food systems fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly [4]. The operational target is a 50% reduction in use and risk of chemical pesticides by 2030. The Walloon Region in Belgium is committed to a strong prevention policy to reduce the impact of pesticide residues on human health and the environment, with a particular focus on water resources. This target will be measured based on i) the quantities of active substances by using an unbiased index and ii) the hazard properties of plant protection products (PPP) gathered in a negative list for the water resource. In order to be able to monitor PPP applications at farm level, several indicators have been used, such as the French widespread indicator “TFI” (Treatment Frequency Index). Nevertheless, it was demonstrated that this index implies a systematic bias in the evaluation of active substances used. Therefore, to quantify the pesticides used by farmers, a derived unbiased index called “ISAC” based on Active Substances per Crop has been developed and is now applied to compare several weeds control strategies. A focus on water resources preservation can be realized by selecting problematic active substances (such as chloridazon, metamitron, dimethenamid-P, ethofumesate, lenacile, …) into the ISAC, therefore obtaining an index of pressure on water resources (ISAC’eau). Theses indexes have been applied on Walloon farming practices related to weeds control through herbicides use on sugar beet crop. In conclusion, the use of the Unbiased Impact Index allows relevant comparisons between different strategies that can in fine help to propose alternatives for reducing herbicides use in sugar beet and their impact on the water resources. Obviously, it is necessary to investigate how to manage weeds with less or no herbicides in arable farming while maintaining the productivity, which implies considering agronomic performance such as yield, and crop net profit.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akay Demir AE, Dilek FB, Yetis U (2019) A new screening index for pesticides leachability to groundwater. J Environ Manag 231:1193–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.007
Cioni F, Maines G (2010) Weed control in sugarbeet. Sugar Tech 12:243–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-010-0036-2
Durenne B, Weickmans B, Malice E, Huyghebaert B, Henriet, F (2021) ISAC, an unbiased indicator based on active substances for evaluating PPP use. In: Proceedings in 72nd international symposium on crop protection (ISCP). Ghent University, 18 mai 2021
European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety (2017) Sustainable use of pesticides: overview report. https://doi.org/10.2875/846869
Guichard L, Dedieu F, Jeuffroy M-H et al (2017) Le plan Ecophyto de réduction d’usage des pesticides en France: décryptage d’un échec et raisons d’espérer. Cahiers Agricultures 26:14002. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017004
O’Driscoll JH, Siggins A, Healy MG, McGinley J, Mellander P-E, Morrison L, Ryan PC (2022) A risk ranking of pesticides in Irish drinking water considering chronic health effects. Sci Total Environ 829:154532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154532
Kudsk P, Jørgensen LN, Ørum JE (2018) Pesticide load—a new Danish pesticide risk indicator with multiple applications. Land Use Policy 70:384–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.010
Latruffe L, Diazabakana A, Bockstaller C, Desjeux Y, Finn J, Kelly E, Ryan M, Uthes S (2016) Measurement of sustainability in agriculture: a review of indicators. Stud. Agr. Econ. 118:123–130. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1624
Le Bellec F, Vélu A, Fournier P et al (2015) Helping farmers to reduce herbicide environmental impacts. Ecol Ind 54:207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.020
Lefrancq M, Jadas-Hécart A, La Jeunesse I et al (2017) High frequency monitoring of pesticides in runoff water to improve understanding of their transport and environmental impacts. Sci Total Environ 587–588:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.022
Lopez B, Ollivier P, Togola A et al (2015) Screening of French groundwater for regulated and emerging contaminants. Sci Total Environ 518–519:562–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.110
Acknowledgements
This research project was funded by the Service Public de Wallonie (SPW) and Société Publique de Gestion de l'Eau (SPGE).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bergiers, G., Durenne, B., Weickmans, B., Huyghebaert, B. (2023). Development of a New Unbiased Impact Index on Water for Pesticides Use – A Case Study in Belgium for Herbicides Application on Sugar Beet Crop. In: Pascuzzi, S., Santoro, F. (eds) Farm Machinery and Processes Management in Sustainable Agriculture. FMPMSA 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 289. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13090-8_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13090-8_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13089-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13090-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)