Abstract
Oil refineries play an important role in the economy, mainly in the transport and energy sectors; however, they are energy-intensive industries and responsible for a significant amount of waste and carbon dioxide emissions. Industrial symbiosis can contribute significantly to increasing the sustainability of this sector, as it allows entities that are traditionally separate, to cooperate with each other in sharing resources and allows waste valorization. Thus, this article aims to analyze the main drivers, barriers, and challenges that this industry faces when implementing and developing industrial symbiosis. To this end, an exhaustive survey of published case studies of industrial symbiosis with refineries was conducted to analyze the economic activities involved, the type of flow and the role of refineries as source or sink. The study showed that despite the challenges that this sector has to face for the implementation and development of industrial symbiosis, there are numerous possibilities for its realization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eurostat, European Commission. Air emissions accounts by NACE Rev. 2 activity. https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do. Last accessed 2022/02/09.
Eurostat, European Commission. Generation of waste by waste category, hazardousness and NACE Rev. 2 activity[env_wasgen]. https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_wasgen&lang=en. Last accessed 2022/02/09.
Cervo, H., Ferrasse, J.-H., Descales, B., & Van Eetvelde, G. (2020). Blueprint: A methodology facilitating data exchanges to enhance the detection of industrial symbiosis opportunities – application to a refinery. Chemical Engineering Science, 211, 115254.
Henriques, J. D., Azevedo, J., Dias, R., Estrela, M., Ascenço, C., Vladimirova, D., & Miller, K. (2022). Implementing industrial symbiosis incentives: An applied assessment framework for risk mitigation. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2, 669–692.
Neves, A., Godina, R., Azevedo, S. G., & Matias, J. C. O. (2020). A comprehensive review of industrial symbiosis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119113.
Wadström, C., Johansson, M., & Wallén, M. (2021). A framework for studying outcomes in industrial symbiosis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 151, 111526.
Herczeg, G., Akkerman, R., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2018). Supply chain collaboration in industrial symbiosis networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1058–1067.
Mendez-Alva, F., Cervo, H., Krese, G., & Van Eetvelde, G. (2021). Industrial symbiosis profiles in energy-intensive industries: Sectoral insights from open databases. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314, 128031.
Liu, Z., Ashton, W. S., Adams, M., Wang, Q., Cote, R. P., Walker, T. R., Sun, L., & Lowitt, P. (2022). Diversity in financing and implementation pathways for industrial symbiosis across the globe. Environment, Development and Sustainability.
Golmohamadi, H. (2022). Demand-side management in industrial sector: A review of heavy industries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 156, 111963.
Ketabchi, E., Mechleri, E., & Arellano-Garcia, H. (2019). Increasing operational efficiency through the integration of an oil refinery and an ethylene production plant. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 152, 85–94.
Park, H.-S., Rene, E. R., Choi, S.-M., & Chiu, A. S. F. (2008). Strategies for sustainable development of industrial park in Ulsan, South Korea—From spontaneous evolution to systematic expansion of industrial symbiosis. Journal of Environmental Management, 87, 1–13.
Baas, L. (2011). Planning and uncovering industrial symbiosis: Comparing the Rotterdam and Östergötland regions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20, 428–440.
Baas, L. W., & Huisingh, D. (2008). The synergistic role of embeddedness and capabilities in industrial symbiosis: illustration based upon 12 years of experiences in the Rotterdam Harbour and Industry Complex. Progress in Industrial Ecology, an International Journal, 5, 399–421.
Chertow, M. R., Ashton, W. S., & Espinosa, J. C. (2008). Industrial symbiosis in Puerto Rico: Environmentally related agglomeration economies. null, 42, 1299–1312.
Chertow, M. R., & Lombardi, D. R. (2005). Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 6535–6541.
Kuznetsova, E., Louhichi, R., Zio, E., & Farel, R. (2017). Input-output Inoperability Model for the risk analysis of eco-industrial parks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 779–792.
Bansal, P., & McKnight, B. (2009). Looking forward, pushing back and peering sideways: Analyzing the sustainability of industrial symbiosis. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45, 26–37.
Mirata, M. (2004). Experiences from early stages of a national industrial symbiosis programme in the UK: Determinants and coordination challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 967–983.
Notarnicola, B., Tassielli, G., & Renzulli, P. A. (2016). Industrial symbiosis in the Taranto industrial district: Current level, constraints and potential new synergies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, 133–143.
Branson, R. (2016). Re-constructing Kalundborg: The reality of bilateral symbiosis and other insights. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4344–4352.
Chopra, S. S., & Khanna, V. (2014). Understanding resilience in industrial symbiosis networks: Insights from network analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 141, 86–94.
Domenech, T., & Davies, M. (2011). Structure and morphology of industrial symbiosis networks: The case of Kalundborg. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 10, 79–89.
Ehrenfeld, J., & Gertler, N. (1997). Industrial ecology in practice: The evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1, 67–79.
Jacobsen, N. B. (2006). Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10, 239–255.
Valentine, S. V. (2016). Kalundborg Symbiosis: fostering progressive innovation in environmental networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 118, 65–77.
Zhang, X., & Chai, L. (2019). Structural features and evolutionary mechanisms of industrial symbiosis networks: Comparable analyses of two different cases. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 528–539.
Zhang, Y., Zheng, H., Chen, B., & Yang, N. (2013). Social network analysis and network connectedness analysis for industrial symbiotic systems: model development and case study. Frontiers of Earth Science, 7, 169–181.
Harris, S., & Pritchard, C. (2004). Industrial Ecology as a learning process in business strategy. Progress in Industrial Ecology, an International Journal, 1, 89–111.
Notarnicola, B., Tassielli, G., & Renzulli, P. A. (2014). Potential developments of industrial symbiosis in the Taranto Productive District. In R. Salomone & G. Saija (Eds.), Pathways to environmental sustainability: Methodologies and experiences (pp. 215–224). Springer International Publishing.
Nilsson, J., & Martin, M. (2022). Exploratory environmental assessment of large-scale cultivation of seaweed used to reduce enteric methane emissions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 413–423.
Chertow, M., & Miyata, Y. (2011). Assessing collective firm behavior: comparing industrial symbiosis with possible alternatives for individual companies in Oahu, HI. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20, 266–280.
Eckelman, M. J., & Chertow, M. R. (2013). Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of a US industrial symbiosis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 1524–1532.
Won, J., Kim, J., Lee, S., & Park, H. (2006). Industrial symbiosis as an integrated business/environment management process: The case of ulsan industrial complex. In 2006 International forum on strategic technology (pp. 423–428).
Chae, S. H., Kim, S. H., Yoon, S.-G., & Park, S. (2010). Optimization of a waste heat utilization network in an eco-industrial park. Applied Energy, 87, 1978–1988.
Cerceau, J., Mat, N., Junqua, G., Lin, L., Laforest, V., & Gonzalez, C. (2014). Implementing industrial ecology in port cities: International overview of case studies and cross-case analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 74, 1–16.
Yin, C.-Y., & Lee, L. Y. (2019). Teaching chemical engineering students industrial symbiosis using online resources: A Singapore case study. Education for Chemical Engineers, 27, 28–34.
van Beers, D., Bossilkov, A., Corder, G., & van Berkel, R. (2007). Industrial symbiosis in the Australian minerals industry: The cases of Kwinana and Gladstone. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11, 55–72.
Harris, S. (2007). Industrial symbiosis in the Kwinana Industrial Area (Western Australia). Measurement and Control, 40, 239–244.
MacLachlan, I. (2013). Kwinana Industrial Area: Agglomeration economies and industrial symbiosis on Western Australia’s Cockburn Sound. null, 44, 383–400.
Oughton, C., Anda, M., Kurup, B., & Ho, G. (2021). Water circular economy at the Kwinana Industrial Area, Western Australia—the dimensions and value of industrial symbiosis. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1, 995–1018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Neves, Â., Ferreira, H., Lopes, F.J., Godina, R., Matias, J.C.O. (2023). Industrial Symbiosis Applied to Oil Refineries: Drivers and Barriers. In: de Oliveira Matias, J.C., Oliveira Pimentel, C.M., Gonçalves dos Reis, J.C., Costa Martins das Dores, J.M., Santos, G. (eds) Quality Innovation and Sustainability. ICQUIS 2022. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12914-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12914-8_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12913-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-12914-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)