Abstract
Distance learning may lead to decreased social presence of students in higher education, potentially causing deterioration of both student learning out-comes and their mental health. Telepresence robotics is seen as an approach that, through the embodied agent of a robotic body, enhances student social presence in the classroom, improving the quality of classroom interaction. In the literature review, we analyzed the current state of research on using telepresence robots in higher education, and, based on existing papers, studied the strengths and weaknesses of using these robots in higher education. Based on our findings, we suggest that the literature in this area is scarce, requiring further studies in the future. The current telepresence robots struggle in relaying flawless telepresence experience, but can still be recommended in certain scenarios. We conclude that despite telepresence robotics being a promising technology, longitudinal studies are required to reach better understanding about the features that telepresence robots should have when used in higher education and about the best use methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Glowatz, M., Al, E.: COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. J. Appl. Teach. Learn. (JALT) 3(1), 9–28 (2020)
Mseleku, Z.: A literature review of E-learning and E-teaching in the era of Covid-19 pandemic. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 5(10), 588–597 (2020)
Carrillo, C., Flores, M.A.: COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices. Eur. J. Teach. Educ. 43, 466–487 (2020)
Gunawardena, C.N.: Social presence theory and implications for interaction collaborative learning in computer conferences. Int. J. Educ. Telecommun. 1(2/3), 147–166 (1995)
Lowenthal, P.R., Dunlap, J.C.: Investigating students’ perceptions of instructional strategies to establish social presence. Distance Educ. 39, 281–298 (2018)
Mollahosseini, A., Abdollahi, H., Sweeny, T.D., Cole, R.A., Mahoor, M.H.: Role of embodiment and presence in human perception of robots’ facial cues. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 116, 25–39 (2018)
Mennecke, B.E., Triplett, J.L., Hassall, L.M., Conde, Z.J.: Embodied social presence theory. In: 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Honolulu (2010)
Weibel, M., et al.: Back to school with telepresence robot technology: a qualitative pilot study about how telepresence robots help school-aged children and adolescents with cancer to remain socially and academically connected with their school classes during treatment. Nurs. Open 7, 988–997 (2020)
Powell, T., Cohen, J., Patterson, P.: Keeping connected with school: implementing telepresence robots to improve the wellbeing of adolescent cancer patients. Front. Psychol. 12, 749957 (2021)
Double Robotics. https://www.doublerobotics.com/double3.html. Accessed 2 Feb 2022
Google Ngram Viewer. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=telepresence+robot&year_start=2000&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2Ctelepresence%20robot%3B%2Cc0. Accessed 2 Feb 2022
EBSCO. https://www.ebsco.com/academic-libraries/products/ebsco-discovery-service. Accessed 2 Feb 2022
Rovira, C., Guerrero-Solé, F., Codina, L.: Received citations as a main SEO factor of Google Scholar results ranking. Profesional De La Información 27(3), 559–569 (2018)
Google Scholar. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_ylo=2018&q=%2Beducation+%22telepresence+robot%22&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&as_vis=1. Accessed 2 Feb 2022
Corsby, C.L.T., Bryant, A.: “I felt like I was missing out on something”: an evaluation of using remote technology in the classroom. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25(6), 4897–4914 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10207-2
De Jong, D.: Telepresence robots: a phenomenological study of perceptions of graduate students and professors. J. High. Educ. Theory Pract. 21(5), 143–161 (2021)
Fitter, N.T., Raghunath, N., Cha, E., Sanchez, C.A., Takayama, L., Matarić, M.J.: Are we there yet? Comparing remote learning technologies in the university classroom. IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett. 5, 2706–2713 (2020)
Fitter, N.T., Rush, L., Cha, E., Groechel, T.R., Matarić, M.J., Takayama, L.: Closeness is key over long distances: effects of interpersonal closeness on telepresence experience. In: 2020 15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 499–507 (2020)
Gallon, L., Abénia, A., Dubergey, F., Negui, M.: Using a telepresence robot in an educational context. In: 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS 2019), Las Végas, United States (2019)
Jakonen, T., Jauni, H.: Mediated learning materials: visibility checks in telepresence robot mediated classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse 12, 121–145 (2021)
Lei, M., Clemente, I.M., Hu, Y.: Student in the shell: the robotic body and student engagement. Comput. Educ. 130, 59–80 (2019)
Lei, M., Clemente, I.M., Liu, H., et al.: The acceptance of telepresence robots in higher education. Int. J. Soc. Rob. 14, 1025–1042 (2022)
Lister, M.C., Vaughn, J., Brennan-Cook, J., Molloy, M., Kuszajewski, M.L., Shaw, R.J.: Telehealth and telenursing using simulation for pre-licensure USA students. Nurse Educ. Pract. 29, 59–63 (2018)
Rinfret, S.R.: Telepresence robots: a new model for public administration course delivery. J. Public Aff. Educ. 26, 380–390 (2020)
Schouten, A.P., Portegies, T.C., Withuis, I., Willemsen, L.M., Mazerant-Dubois, K.: Robomorphism: examining the effects of telepresence robots on between-student cooperation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 126, 106980 (2022)
Shaw, R.J., et al.: Telepresence robots for pediatric clinical simulations: feasibility and acceptability. Pediatr. Nurs. 44(1), 39–43 (2018)
Thompson, P., Chaivisit, S.: Telepresence robots in the classroom. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 50, 201–214 (2021)
Velinov, A., Koceski, S., Koceska, N.: Review of the usage of telepresence robots in education. Balkan J. Appl. Math. Inf. 4(1), 27–40 (2021)
Leoste, J.: Adopting and sustaining technological innovations in teachers’ classroom practices—the case of integrating educational robots into math classes. Ph.D. thesis, Tallinn University, Estonia (2021)
Xia, S., Lu, Q.: Development status of telesurgery robotic system. Chin. J. Traumatol. 24, 144–147 (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Leoste, J., Kikkas, K., Tammemäe, K., Rebane, M., Laugasson, E., Hakk, K. (2022). Telepresence Robots in Higher Education – The Current State of Research. In: Lepuschitz, W., Merdan, M., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D. (eds) Robotics in Education. RiE 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 515. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12848-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12848-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12847-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-12848-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)