Skip to main content

Telepresence Robots in Higher Education – The Current State of Research

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Robotics in Education (RiE 2022)

Abstract

Distance learning may lead to decreased social presence of students in higher education, potentially causing deterioration of both student learning out-comes and their mental health. Telepresence robotics is seen as an approach that, through the embodied agent of a robotic body, enhances student social presence in the classroom, improving the quality of classroom interaction. In the literature review, we analyzed the current state of research on using telepresence robots in higher education, and, based on existing papers, studied the strengths and weaknesses of using these robots in higher education. Based on our findings, we suggest that the literature in this area is scarce, requiring further studies in the future. The current telepresence robots struggle in relaying flawless telepresence experience, but can still be recommended in certain scenarios. We conclude that despite telepresence robotics being a promising technology, longitudinal studies are required to reach better understanding about the features that telepresence robots should have when used in higher education and about the best use methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Glowatz, M., Al, E.: COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. J. Appl. Teach. Learn. (JALT) 3(1), 9–28 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mseleku, Z.: A literature review of E-learning and E-teaching in the era of Covid-19 pandemic. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 5(10), 588–597 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carrillo, C., Flores, M.A.: COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices. Eur. J. Teach. Educ. 43, 466–487 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunawardena, C.N.: Social presence theory and implications for interaction collaborative learning in computer conferences. Int. J. Educ. Telecommun. 1(2/3), 147–166 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lowenthal, P.R., Dunlap, J.C.: Investigating students’ perceptions of instructional strategies to establish social presence. Distance Educ. 39, 281–298 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mollahosseini, A., Abdollahi, H., Sweeny, T.D., Cole, R.A., Mahoor, M.H.: Role of embodiment and presence in human perception of robots’ facial cues. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 116, 25–39 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mennecke, B.E., Triplett, J.L., Hassall, L.M., Conde, Z.J.: Embodied social presence theory. In: 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Honolulu (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weibel, M., et al.: Back to school with telepresence robot technology: a qualitative pilot study about how telepresence robots help school-aged children and adolescents with cancer to remain socially and academically connected with their school classes during treatment. Nurs. Open 7, 988–997 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Powell, T., Cohen, J., Patterson, P.: Keeping connected with school: implementing telepresence robots to improve the wellbeing of adolescent cancer patients. Front. Psychol. 12, 749957 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Double Robotics. https://www.doublerobotics.com/double3.html. Accessed 2 Feb 2022

  11. Google Ngram Viewer. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=telepresence+robot&year_start=2000&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2Ctelepresence%20robot%3B%2Cc0. Accessed 2 Feb 2022

  12. EBSCO. https://www.ebsco.com/academic-libraries/products/ebsco-discovery-service. Accessed 2 Feb 2022

  13. Rovira, C., Guerrero-Solé, F., Codina, L.: Received citations as a main SEO factor of Google Scholar results ranking. Profesional De La Información 27(3), 559–569 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Google Scholar. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_ylo=2018&q=%2Beducation+%22telepresence+robot%22&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&as_vis=1. Accessed 2 Feb 2022

  15. Corsby, C.L.T., Bryant, A.: “I felt like I was missing out on something”: an evaluation of using remote technology in the classroom. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25(6), 4897–4914 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10207-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Jong, D.: Telepresence robots: a phenomenological study of perceptions of graduate students and professors. J. High. Educ. Theory Pract. 21(5), 143–161 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fitter, N.T., Raghunath, N., Cha, E., Sanchez, C.A., Takayama, L., Matarić, M.J.: Are we there yet? Comparing remote learning technologies in the university classroom. IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett. 5, 2706–2713 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fitter, N.T., Rush, L., Cha, E., Groechel, T.R., Matarić, M.J., Takayama, L.: Closeness is key over long distances: effects of interpersonal closeness on telepresence experience. In: 2020 15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 499–507 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gallon, L., Abénia, A., Dubergey, F., Negui, M.: Using a telepresence robot in an educational context. In: 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS 2019), Las Végas, United States (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jakonen, T., Jauni, H.: Mediated learning materials: visibility checks in telepresence robot mediated classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse 12, 121–145 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lei, M., Clemente, I.M., Hu, Y.: Student in the shell: the robotic body and student engagement. Comput. Educ. 130, 59–80 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lei, M., Clemente, I.M., Liu, H., et al.: The acceptance of telepresence robots in higher education. Int. J. Soc. Rob. 14, 1025–1042 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lister, M.C., Vaughn, J., Brennan-Cook, J., Molloy, M., Kuszajewski, M.L., Shaw, R.J.: Telehealth and telenursing using simulation for pre-licensure USA students. Nurse Educ. Pract. 29, 59–63 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rinfret, S.R.: Telepresence robots: a new model for public administration course delivery. J. Public Aff. Educ. 26, 380–390 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schouten, A.P., Portegies, T.C., Withuis, I., Willemsen, L.M., Mazerant-Dubois, K.: Robomorphism: examining the effects of telepresence robots on between-student cooperation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 126, 106980 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaw, R.J., et al.: Telepresence robots for pediatric clinical simulations: feasibility and acceptability. Pediatr. Nurs. 44(1), 39–43 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson, P., Chaivisit, S.: Telepresence robots in the classroom. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 50, 201–214 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Velinov, A., Koceski, S., Koceska, N.: Review of the usage of telepresence robots in education. Balkan J. Appl. Math. Inf. 4(1), 27–40 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Leoste, J.: Adopting and sustaining technological innovations in teachers’ classroom practices—the case of integrating educational robots into math classes. Ph.D. thesis, Tallinn University, Estonia (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Xia, S., Lu, Q.: Development status of telesurgery robotic system. Chin. J. Traumatol. 24, 144–147 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janika Leoste .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Leoste, J., Kikkas, K., Tammemäe, K., Rebane, M., Laugasson, E., Hakk, K. (2022). Telepresence Robots in Higher Education – The Current State of Research. In: Lepuschitz, W., Merdan, M., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D. (eds) Robotics in Education. RiE 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 515. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12848-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics