Skip to main content

Supersymmetry and the Expansion of the Standard Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Case Studies in Experimental Physics

Abstract

The Standard Model, the accepted theory of particle physics has had an unbroken stream of successes although, as discussed in Chap. 7, there is one tantalizing result in disagreement. It is one of the most successful theories ever proposed. There are, however, things that it does not explain and so physicists have proposed various theories that go beyond the Standard Model. One of these is Supersymmetry. In this chapter we give an introduction to that theory and discuss one of the many experimental searches for evidence of theory, or at least hints toward its structure, all of which have been unsuccessful. We argue, however, that this pursuit, although still ongoing, has been a success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As discussed in Chap. 7, there is now one tantalizing result that stands in conflict with the predictions of the SM.

  2. 2.

    The Higgs boson plays a central role in the mechanism that generates the masses of the fundamental particles that make up the constituency of the SM, where that mass is a manifestation of potential energy transferred to these fundamental particles when they interact with the Higgs field. Thus, solving the puzzle of its smaller than anticipated mass is almost automatically pursuit worthy.

  3. 3.

    For a review of this history see Dimopoulos and Georgi (1981), Fayet (2001), and Rodriguez (2010).

  4. 4.

    In addition to the success of SUSY with regard to the Higgs Boson, “it is intriguing that a weakly interacting, (meta)stable supersymmetric particle might make up some or all of the dark matter in the universe. In addition, SUSY predicts that gauge couplings, as measured experimentally at the electroweak scale, unify at an energy scale … near the Planck scale” (Buchmuller & de Jong 2020, p. 1).

  5. 5.

    For the technical details regarding the underlying mechanism known as soft-electroweak symmetry breaking see Kane et al. (1993) and Espinosa and Quirós (1993).

  6. 6.

    For details Franklin and Laymon (2021, pp. 31–57).

  7. 7.

    For details see Franklin and Laymon (2021, pp. 159–170). And for a recent example of a continuing search see Barrie et al. (2021).

  8. 8.

    For a brief review of these developments see Allanach and Haber (2019, p. 25).

  9. 9.

    There have been numerous unsuccessful searches for physics beyond the Standard Model. As of 2018 the CMS collaboration at CERN had conducted 210 such searches. In addition, there were a similar number performed by the ATLAS collaboration.

  10. 10.

    This depends, of course, on the intensity of the proton beams.

  11. 11.

    A trigger system includes counters and other detectors along with computer programs for making a fast decision on whether to record the data for each event.

  12. 12.

    η is a measure of how close the jet is to the forward direction where the detector does not have coverage. η = 0 corresponds to an angle of 90° with respect to the beam. η = ∞ is along the beamline.

  13. 13.

    PF is Particle Flow, an algorithm used to identify particles.

  14. 14.

    The estimation of background is quite technical and will not be discussed here.

  15. 15.

    This is known as the “look elsewhere” effect.

  16. 16.

    There are, however, some instances which indicate “that care must be taken when interpreting results from the LHC searches and there are still several scenarios where sparticles below the 1 TeV scale are not excluded, even when considering the most recent results at √s = 13 TeV” (Buchmuller & de Jong, 2020, p. 23).

References

  • Adam, W., Bergauer, T., Deldicque, C., Erö, J., Fruehwirth, R., Jeitler, M., Kastner, K., Kostner, S., Neumeister, N., Padrta, M., Porth, P., Rohringer, H., Sakulin, H., Strauss, J., Taurok, A., Walzel, G., Wulz, C. E., Lowette, S., van de Vyver, B., de Lentdecker, G., Vanlaer, P., Delaere, C., Lemaitre, V., Ninane, A., van der Aa, O., Damgov, J., Karimäki, V., Kinnunen, R., … Smith, W. H. (2006). The CMS high level trigger. European Physics Journal C, 46, 605–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allanach, B. B., & Haber, H. E. (2019) Supersymmetry, Part I (Theory). Available at the Particle Data Group (PDG) website: https://pdg.lbl.gov/2019/reviews/rpp2019-rev-susy-1-theory.pdf

  • Barrie, N. D., Sugamoto, A., Talia, M., & Yamashita, K. (2021). Searching for monopoles via monopolium multiphoton decays. Nuclear Physics B, 972, 115564.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmuller, O., & de Jong, P. (2020). Supersymmetry, Part II (Experiment). Available at the Particle Data Group (PDG) website: https://pdg.lbl.gov/2020/reviews/rpp2020-rev-susy-2-experiment.pdf

  • CERN. (2022). Supersymmetry predicts a partner particle for each particle in the Standard Model, to help explain why particles have mass. Available at: https://home.cern/science/physics/supersymmetry

  • Chatrchyan, S., Khachatryan, V., Sirunyan, A. M., Tumasyan, A., Adam, W., Aguilo, E., Bergauer, T., Dragicevic, M., Erö, J., Fabjan, C., & Friedl, M. (2012). Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Physics Letters B, 716, 30–61.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dimopoulos, S., & Georgi, H. (1981). Softly Broken Supersymmetry and SU(5). Nuclear Physics, B, 193, 150–161.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa, J. R., & Quirós, M. (1993). Upper bounds on the lightest Higgs boson mass in general supersymmetric Standard Model. Physics Letters B, 302, 51–58.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fayet, P. (2001). About the origins of the supersymmetric Standard Model. Nuclear Physics B: Proceedings Supplements, 101, 81–98.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A., & Laymon, R. (2021). Once can be enough: Decisive experiments, no replication required. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, G. L., Kolda, C., & Wells, J. D. (1993). Calculable upper limit on the mass of the lightest Higgs boson in perturbatively valid supersymmetric theories with arbitrary Higgs sectors. Physical Review Letters, 70, 2686.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, M. C. (2010). History of supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 25, 1091–1121.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sirunyan, A. M., Tumasyan, A., Adam, W., Ambrogi, F., Asilar, E., Bergauer, T., Brandstetter, J., Brondolin, E., Dragicevic, M., Erö, J., & Flechl, M. (2017). Search for supersymmetry in multijet events with missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV. Physical Review D, 96, 032002-032001–032003-032038.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan Franklin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laymon, R., Franklin, A. (2022). Supersymmetry and the Expansion of the Standard Model. In: Case Studies in Experimental Physics. Synthesis Lectures on Engineering, Science, and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12608-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics