Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Case Studies in Experimental Physics

Abstract

This chapter includes Laudan’s initial discussion of pursuit and acceptance, a brief discussion of our extension to experiment, and a description of the case studies to follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Which may after all be construed as a matter of greater pursuit worthiness than its alternatives so that it becomes a matter of prudence that some research be conducted on the less pursuit worthy alternatives.

  2. 2.

    For elaborations on these categories see: Achinstein (1993), Cabera (2021), Franklin (1993), Laudan (1977), Lichtenstein (2021), Nickles (1981), Nyrup (2015), Patton (2012), and Šešelja and Straßer (2014).

  3. 3.

    For an extended analysis of where to draw the line when it comes to specifying what existing standards are to be taken into account when deciding pursuit worthiness see Shaw (2022).

  4. 4.

    While Laudan tends to speak of “research traditions” we think “research program” has a forward-looking connotation that better captures the sense of what’s involved when deciding to pursue a promising theoretical or experimental development.

References

  • Achinstein, P. (1993). How to defend a theory without testing it: Niels Bohr and the logic of pursuit. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18, 90–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabera, F. (2021). String Theory, non-empirical theory assessment, and the context of pursuit. Synthese, 198(Suppl 16), S3671-3699.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A. (1993). Discovery, pursuit, and justification. Perspectives on Science, 1, 252–284.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, E. I. (2021). (Mis)Understanding scientific disagreement: Success versus pursuit-worthiness in theory choice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 85, 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T. (1981). What is a problem that we may solve it? Synthese, 47, 85–118.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nyrup, R. (2015). How explanatory reasoning justifies pursuit: A Peircean view of IBE. Philosophy of Science, 82, 749–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, L. (2012). Experiment and theory building. Synthese, 184, 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ĺ ešelja, D., & StraĂźer, D. (2014). Epistemic justification in the context of pursuit: A coherentist approach. Synthese, 191, 3111–3141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. (2022). On the very idea of pursuitworthiness. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 91, 103–112

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan Franklin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laymon, R., Franklin, A. (2022). Introduction. In: Case Studies in Experimental Physics. Synthesis Lectures on Engineering, Science, and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12608-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics