Skip to main content

New Pragmatism for New Times

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Economy of New Pragmatism

Abstract

Economics is a beautiful science because it serves human well-being. It is a body of knowledge about economic activity in all its aspects, and when we are able to add new segments to the knowledge accumulated over generations—new observations of phenomena and processes and their innovative theoretical explanations—it is no longer just knowledge, but a science.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Albert Einstein (1879–1955)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I am leaving aside the changes in the cosmos that occur as a result of explosions or collisions between celestial bodies, which we learn about after a time that is a function of the light years separating the occurrence of the fact from the time it reaches the consciousness of earthly observers.

  2. 2.

    The first volume of Marx’s fundamental work Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie was published in German in 1867. Marx’s contribution to philosophical and economic thought has been extensively discussed by Stedman (2016).

  3. 3.

    Keynes’s fundamental work The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money was published in 1936.

  4. 4.

    ‘In favour of’ in this case means respondents having a ‘very or somewhat positive impression of…’.

  5. 5.

    The older people get, the more they prefer capitalism to socialism. While some 43% of the 30-49 age group are still in favour of socialism, some 62% are in favour of capitalism (the answers did not necessarily add up to 100%), and among people over 65 years of age these figures amounted to some 35% and some 77%, respectively. These relations are shaped differently among supporters of Democrats and Republicans; the former have significantly more supporters of ‘socialism’, the latter of ‘capitalism’ (Harting 2019).

  6. 6.

    Comparative international statistics specify 224 states and territories (CIA 2021), while the United Nations counts 193 independent states. The Vatican, which does not belong to the UN, is also a state as defined by international law.

  7. 7.

    During just the first two months of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as many as 5 million Ukrainians fled abroad, of which about half went to neighbouring Poland.

  8. 8.

    It is not entirely clear what will be the ecological effects of Western countries resigning from importing energy resources, especially oil, from Russia as a result of economic sanctions imposed on it in 2022–2023. Replacing Russian oil with imports from some African deposits, especially from Angola and Nigeria, may have mid-term negative consequences for the natural environment.

  9. 9.

    Yet, to the surprise of many, the bad time for the yachts has suddenly come; at least for the ones owned by the Russian corrupted oligarchs. They were not much of a public concern for couple of decades when they were built and lucratively sold for stolen money being in the meantime laundered mostly in the US and the UK. Only in 2022, when severe sanctions have been imposed on Russia in the aftermath of its attack against Ukraine sovereignty, people of the world learned that yachts of a value exceeding one billion dollars have been arrested. And, how interesting!, that on the average the Russian oligarch yachts are by 3 m longer than the ones owned by the American billionaires; 61 and 58 m, respectively.

  10. 10.

    The Gini coefficient in China is as high as 46.5, similar to that in the USA, where it is estimated to be 47. Currently, in the former case it is already falling, while in the latter, it is rising again.

  11. 11.

    The Gini coefficient is the most widely used measure of inequality in the distribution of income. Theoretically, in extreme cases, it equals 0 when everyone earns an identical income, and 100 when one takes all the income and the others have nothing. In practice, the extremes fluctuate around 25 (e.g. Slovenia 24) and do not exceed 70 (e.g. South Africa 63).

  12. 12.

    With a population of 1.39 billion, China produces 18.6% of the gross world product, as measured by PPP, which is more than the USA (16.6%). During the 70 years of the People’s Republic of China, between 1949 and 2019, GDP per capita, this time calculated at the exchange rate, grew at an average annual rate of 6.8%, increasing almost 14 times.

  13. 13.

    An interesting comment has been made vis-à-vis the media presentation of the Russia-Ukraine conflict: “…there is clearly some truth and much exaggeration in both the American and Russian positions. All of which raise questions about the media’s performance in such a polarised and militarised environment. After all, only a free press is able to interrogate state power and propagate the facts about the war. I am in no way surprised that in authoritarian Russia, the government has intimidated and silenced critics of its war, but I am rather shocked by the venomous attacks on critics of US foreign policies by their fellow journalists and citizens, accusing them of acting as a “fifth column” on “Putin’s payroll”. I am not sure which is worse, journalists forced to toe the official line, or doing it voluntarily, even enthusiastically, in order to get ahead in Washington or London. Unfortunately, we are witnessing a repeat of the disastrous Gulf War coverage of two decades ago, where much of the influential Anglo-Saxon mainstream media sided rather blindly and foolishly with the official line. For some reason, many of the same gung-ho armchair journalists and chickenhawk pundits, who got it all wrong about the disastrous Iraq War, feel the need, yet again, to incite Western establishments and enlighten them with military insights.” (Bishara 2022).

  14. 14.

    I use the term ‘new pragmatism’ without any relation to the philosophical current also known as ‘new pragmatism’ (Gunn 1992) formed in the late nineteenth century. I introduced this term not as something in opposition to ‘old pragmatism’ but using ‘new’ in the sense of different, distinct from what used to be.

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron, James A. Robinson (2012), Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, Crown Business, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, George A., Robert J. Shiller (2015), Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. Brian (2015), Complexity of the Economy, Oxford University Press, Oxford – New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Anthony B. (2018), Inequality: What Can Be Done?, Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, Robert J. (2009), Game Engineering, „Distinguished Lectures Series”, No. 20, Kozminski University, Warsaw (http://www.tiger.edu.pl/publikacje/distinguished_20.pdf; access: 27.01.2022).

  • BBC (2019), US states file lawsuit accusing drugs firms of inflating costs, “BBC News”, May 12 (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48241663; access: 10.01.2022).

  • Bishara, Marwan (2022), Debating the debate over the Russian war in Ukraine, “Al Jazeera”, May 4, 2022 (https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/5/4/debating-the-debate-over-the-russian-war-in-ukraine; access: May 7, 2022).

  • Bremmer, Ian (2010), The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War between States and Corporations?, Portfolio, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, Markus K., Harold James, Jean-Pierre Landau (2016), The Euro and the Battles of Ideas, Princeton University Press, Princeton – Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Winston (2008), Churchill by Himself: The Definitive Collection of Quotations, Ebury Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA (2021), The World Factbook, Central Intelligence Agency, Washington, D.C. (https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/; access: 25.12.2021).

  • Cooper, George (2014), Money, Blood and Revolution: How Darwin and the doctor of King Charles I could turn economics into a science, Harriman House, Petersfield, Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csaba, László (2009), Crisis in Economics?, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csaba, László (2019), Unorthodoxy in Hungary: an illiberal success story?, „Post-Communist Economies”, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2019.1641949 (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14631377.2019.1641949?needAccess=true; access: 13.12.2019).

  • Economist (2019a), Corporate crises. Scandals suggest standards have slipped in corporate America, “The Economist”, April 6 (https://www.economist.com/business/2019/04/06/scandals-suggest-standards-have-slipped-in-corporate-america; access 10.01.2022).

  • Economist (2019b), What companies are for, „The Economist”, August 24 (https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/08/22/what-companies-are-for; access 25.12.2021).

  • Economist (2019c), Continent of discontent, „The Economist”, September 7 (https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2019/09/07/nearly-a-third-of-latin-americans-want-to-emigrate; access 25.12.2021).

  • Economist (2021), Labour markets are working, but also changing, „The Economist”, April 10 (https://www.economist.com/special-report/2021/04/08/labour-markets-are-working-but-also-changing; access: 13.12.2021).

  • Economist (2022), Welcome to the era of the bossy state, “The Economist”, January 15 (https://www.economist.com/leaders/2022/01/15/welcome-to-the-era-of-the-bossy-state; access 22.01.2022).

  • Economist (2012), True progressivism, „The Economist”, October 13 (https://www.economist.com/leaders/2012/10/13/true-progressivism; access 25.12.2021).

  • Economist (2016), The new nationalism, „The Economist”, November 19 (https://www.economist.com/leaders/2016/11/19/the-new-nationalism; access 25.12.2021).

  • Economy, Elizabeth C. (2018), The Third World Revolution: Xi Jinping and the New Chinese State, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIU (2021), Democracy Index 2020 In sickness and in health? A report by The Economist Intelligence Unit, London, The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited (https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2020/; access: 13.12.2021).

  • Friedman, Milton (1970), The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits, „The New York Times Magazine”, September 13 (http://websites.umich.edu/~thecore/doc/Friedman.pdf; access: 13.12.2021).

  • Fukuyama, Francis (1989), The End of History?, “The National Interest”, No. 16, Summer, p. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John K. (1958), The Affluent Society, Houghton Mifflin, Boston. GFP (2021), Defense Spending by Country (2021), www.GlobalForepower.com (https://www.globalfirepower.com/defense-spending-budget.php; access: 13.12.2021).

  • Galbraith, James K. (2014), The End of Normal: The Great Crisis and the Future of Growth, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, James K. (2018), Backwater Economics and New Pragmatism: Institutions and Evolution in the Search for a Sustainable Economics, TIGER Working Papers Series”, No. 138, Kozminski University, Warsaw (http://www.tiger.edu.pl/TWP%20No.%20138%20--%20Galbraith.pdf; access: 13.12.2021).

  • Galbraith, James K. (2019a), The Pragmatism of John Kenneth Galbraith, „Acta Oeconomica”, Vol. 69, Special Issue 1, p. 195-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, James K. (2019b), Old and New Pragmatism: Challenges and Opportunities for Economics. Lecture delivered at the inauguration of the academic year at the Faculty of Economics of the University of Gdańsk, September 30 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwMbra5XWIk&ab_channel=Wydzia%C5%82Ekonomiczny; access: 13.12.2021).

  • Galbraith, James K. (2019c), Klucz do stworzenia egalitarnego społeczeństwa [The key to creating an egalitarian society], „Rzeczpospolita”, November 23–24, p. 14–16 [in Polish].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, Oscar (2021), Here's how much electricity it takes to mine Bitcoin and why people are worried, C/Net Money, August 31 (https://www.cnet.com/personal-finance/crypto/heres-how-much-electricity-it-takes-to-mine-bitcoin-and-why-people-are-worried/; access 6.01.2022).

  • Gostomski, Anzelm (1951), Gospodarstwo [Possessions], Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław [in Polish].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, Lynda, Andrew Scott (2016), The 100-Year Life: Living and Working in the Age of Longevity, Bloomsbury, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinberg, Rusłan S., Aleksandr J. Rubinsztein (2014), Indiwiduum i gosudarstwo: ekonomiczeskaja dilemma [Individuum and household: ekonomiczeskaja dilemma]. Wies Mir, Moskwa [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, Giles (1992), Thinking Across the American Grain: Ideology, Intellect, and the New Pragmatism, The University of Chicago Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harting, Hannah (2019), Stark partisan divisions in Americans’ views of ‘socialism’, ‘capitalism’, „Factank”, Pew Research Center (https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/25/stark-partisan-divisions-in-americans-views-of-socialism-capitalism/; access: 13.12.2021).

  • Harty, Declan (2021), SEC Chair Gary Gensler slams crypto as the ‘Wild West’, “Fortune”, August 3, 2021 (https://fortune.com/2021/08/03/crypto-defi-sec-chair-gary-gensler-regulation-wild-west/; access 20.12.2021).

  • Harvey, David (2005), A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford – New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David (2015), Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism, Profile Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellebrandt, Tomáš, Paolo Mauro (2015), The Future of Worldwide Income Distribution, „Working Paper”, WP 15–17, Peterson Institute for International Economics, April (https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/publications/wp/wp15-7.pdf; access: 13.12.2021).

  • HF (2021), 2021 Index of Economic Freedom, Heritage Foundation, Washington, D.C. (https://www.heritage.org/index/ranking; access: 13.12.2021).

  • Huang, Yukon (2017), Cracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels (2000), The Communist Manifesto, Martino Fine Books, Eastford, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2019), Global Warming of 1.5°C, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/; access: 13.12.2021).

  • Johnson, Neil F. (2017), Simply Complexity. A Clear Guide to Complexity Theory, Oneworld Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel (2011), Thinking, fast and slow, Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Sarah (2018), Gigged: The Gig Economy, the End of the Job and the Future of Work, St. Martin Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Stephen D. (2013), When the Money Runs Out. The End of Western Affluence, Yale University Press, New Haven – London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Matthew C., Michael Pettis (2020). Trade Wars Are Class Wars: How Rising Inequality Distorts the Global Economy and Threatens International Peace, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodko, Grzegorz W., Michal Rutkowski (1991), The Problem of Transition from a Socialist to a Free Market Economy: The Case of Poland, „The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies”, Vol. 16, No. 2, p. 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodko, Grzegorz W. (2002), Globalization and Catching-up in Transition Economies, University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY – Woodbridge, Suffolk, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodko, Grzegorz W. (2011), Truth, Errors and Lies. Politics and Economics in a Volatile World, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodko, Grzegorz W. (2014), The New Pragmatism, or Economics and Policy for the Future, „Acta Oeconomica”, Vol. 64, No. 2, p. 139–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodko, Grzegorz W. (2020), China and the Future of Globalization: The Political Economy of China’s Rise, Bloomsbury I.B. Tauris, London – New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodko, Grzegorz W. (2021), The Quest for Development Success: Bridging Theoretical Reasoning with Economic Practice, Lexington Books – Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham – Boulder – New York – London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koźmiński, Andrzej K., Adam Noga, Katarzyna Piotrowska, Krzysztof Zagórski (2020), The Balanced Development Index for Europe’s OECD Countries, 1999–2017, „Springer Briefs in Economics”, Springer, Cham, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul (2020), Arguing with Zombies: Economics, Politics, and the Fight for a Better Future, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenzler, Adrian (2017), Restoring Consumer Sovereignty: How Markets Manipulate Us and What the Law Can Do About It, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, Mordecai (2017), On the Formation of Capital and Wealth: IT, Monopoly Power and Rising Inequality, „Research Paper”, 17–016, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (https://siepr.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/17-016_0.pdf; access: 13.12.2021).

  • Legatum (2021), The Legatum Prosperity Index 2021, Legatum Institute, London (https://www.prosperity.com/; access: 22.12.2021).

  • Lemieux, Pierre (2018), What’s Wrong with Protectionism: Answering Common Objections to Free Trade, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Justin Yifu (2012a), Demystifying the Chinese Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Justin Yifu (2012b), New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Justin Yifu (2013), Against the Consensus: Reflections on the Great Recession, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Weidong (2019), The Belt and Road Initiative: A Pathway towards Inclusive Globalization, Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein, Roger (2004), Origins of the Crash: The Great Bubble and Its Undoing, Penguin Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, Branko (2011), The Haves and the Have-Nots: A Brief and Idiosyncratic History of Global Inequality, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, Branko (2019), Capitalism, Alone: The Future of the System That Rules the World, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2021a), Better Life Index, Paris: OECD (https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/#/00000000000; access: 13.12.2021).

  • OECD (2021b), Level of GDP per capita and productivity, OECD.Stat (https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=PDB_LV; access: 11.12.2021).

  • Our World in Data (2021a), GDP per capita in England, (https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-in-the-uk-since-1270?time=1270..2016); access: 14.12.2021).

  • Our World in Data (2021b), Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccinations, „Our World in Data: Statistics and Research” (https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations; access: 13.12.2011).

  • Pei, Minxin (2016), China’s Crony Capitalism: The Dynamics of Regime Decay, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, Edmund S. (2013), Mass Flourishing: How Grassroots Innovation Created Jobs, Challenge, and Change, Princeton University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polman, Paul, Andrew Winston (2021), Net Positive: How Courageous Companies Thrive by Giving More Than They Take, Harvard Business Review Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richta, Radovan (1966), Civilizace na rozcestí: společenské a lidské souvislosti vědeckotechnické revoluce [ Civilization at a crossroads: the social and human context of the scientific and technological revolution ], Svoboda, Praha [in Czech].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, Matt (2010), The Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves, Harper-Collins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, Gerard (2019), Coexisting with China in the 21st Century, „Acta Oeconomica”, Vol. 69, Special Issue 1, p. 49–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosling, Hans, Ola Rosling i Anna Rosling Ronnlund (2018), Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong About the World – and Why Things Are Better than You Think, Flatiron Book, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, J. Barkley Jr., Marina V. Rosser (2018), Comparative Economics in a Transforming World Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saez, Emmanuel, Gabriel Zucman (2019), The Triumph of Injustice: How the Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make Them Pay, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, Alvaro, Chantal Thomas, David Trubek (2019), World Trade and Investment Law Reimagined: A Progressive Agenda for an Inclusive Globalization, Anthem Press, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (2008), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Harper Collins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlacek, Tomas (2011), Economics of Good and Evil: The Quest for Economic Meaning from Gilgamesh to Wall Street, Oxford University Press, Oxford – New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidelsky, Robert (2020), What’s Wrong with Economics? A Primer for the Perplexed, Yale University Press, New Haven – London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, Steven, Philip Fernbach (2017), The Knowledge Illusion: Why We Never Think Alone, Riverhead Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman Jones, Gareth (2016), Karl Marx: Greatness and Illusion, Allen Lane, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E., Jean-Paul Fitoussi, Martine Durand (2019), Beyond GDP: Measuring What Counts for Economic and Social Performance, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2001), Asymmetries of Information and Economic Policy, „Project Syndicate”, December 4 (https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/asymmetries-of-information-and-economic-policy-2001-12; access 24.01.2022).

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2010), Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2019a), People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent, W.W. Norton & Company, New York – London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2019b), Progressive Capitalism Is Not an Oxymoron, „The New York Times”, April 19 (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/opinion/sunday/progressive-capitalism.html; access 13.12.2021).

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2019c), Can we trust CEOs’ shock conversion to corporate benevolence?, „The Guardian”, August 29 (https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/aug/29/can-we-trust-ceos-shock-conversion-to-corporate-benevolence; access: 13.12.2019).

  • Strange, Susan (1986), Casino Capitalism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundararajan, Arun (2017), The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard H., Cass R. Sunstein (2009), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Penguin Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard H. (2016), Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, Jean (2017), Economics of the Common Good, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toews, Gerhard, Pierre-Louis Vézina (2021), Enemies of the people , “NES Working Paper”, w0279, New Economic School (NES), Moscow (https://drive.google.com/file/d/12S539Kia7kEtFY7Y5xRU6pFTFyMQeVCs/view; access 22.12.2021).

  • UNDP (2021a), Human Development Index, United Nations Development Programme, New York (http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2020_statistical_annex_table_3.pdf; access: 13.12.2021).

  • UNDP (2021b), Inequality Adjusted Human Development Index (http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/inequality-adjusted-human-development-index-ihdi; access: 22.12.2021).

  • Wallace-Wells, David (2019), The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming, Tim Duggan Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Huiyao, Alistair Michie (eds.), Consensus or Conflict: China and Globalization in the 21st Century, Springer, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Elizabeth (2018), This Fight Is Our Fight: The Battle to Save America’s Middle Class, Metropolitan Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHR (2021), World Happiness Report, Sustainable Development Solutions Network (https://happiness-report.s3.amazonaws.com/2021/WHR+21.pdf; access: 22.12.2021).

  • World Bank (2002), Globalization, Growth and Poverty: Building an Inclusive World Economy, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer Julian E. (2015), The Fierce Urgency of Now: Lyndon Johnson, Congress, and the Battle for the Great Society, Penguin Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grzegorz W. Kolodko .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kolodko, G.W. (2022). New Pragmatism for New Times. In: Political Economy of New Pragmatism. Springer Studies in Alternative Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12263-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics