Skip to main content

An Evaluation of \({{\varvec{V}}}_{{{\varvec{SZ}}}}\) Estimates from the P-wave Seismogram Method for Sites in California

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Beijing 2022) (PBD-IV 2022)

Abstract

The P-wave seismogram method estimates the average shear wave velocity over a representative depth (\(V_{SZ}\)) from earthquake recordings at a site. The \(V_{SZ}\) is computed from the amplitudes of the radial and vertical P-wave arrivals on the earthquake recordings and an estimate of the seismological ray parameter (\(p\)). The ray parameter is estimated from the depth of the event, the epicentral distance, and the regional crustal velocity model. We evaluated the P-wave seismogram approach to estimating \(V_{SZ}\) at 153 seismic recording stations in California for which shear wave velocity profiles are available and tested the effect of different crustal models on the estimated ray parameter and the resulting \(V_{SZ}\). Across all the sites, the estimated \(V_{SZ}\) values were, on average, about 24% larger than the measured \(V_{SZ}\), although the difference was negligible for softer sites and as large as 45% at stiffer sites (>1000 m/s). Two crustal velocity models for California were considered: a simplified four-layer crustal model for the entire state and a set of more detailed crustal models used for different parts of the state. The effect of the assumed crustal velocity profile was not significant for earthquake events with focal depths greater than about 3–5 km, but for shallower events the detailed crustal velocity model produced \(V_{SZ}\) values significantly smaller than the \(V_{SZ}\) from the simplified crustal velocity model due to the effect of the shallow low velocity layers and large gradient on the ray parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wald, D.J., Allen, T.I.: Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification. Bull. Seisol. Soc. Am. 97, 1379–1395 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yong, A.: Comparison of measured and proxy-based values in California. Earthq. Spectra 32(1), 171–192 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wills, C.J., Clahan, K.B.: Developing a map of geologically defined site-condition categories for California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, 1483–1501 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Parker, G.A., et al.: Proxy-based estimation in central, and eastern North America. Bull. Seisol. Soc. Am. 107(1), 117–131 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1785/012016010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ni, S., Li, Z., Somerville, P.: Estimating subsurface shear velocity with radial to vertical ratio of local P waves. Seismol. Res. Lett. 85(1), 82–89 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, B., et al.: Subsurface shear-wave velocity characterization using P-wave seismograms in Central, and Eastern North America. Earthq. Spectra 32(1), 143–169 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zalachoris, G., Rathje, E.M., Paine, J.G.: VS30 characterization of Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas using the P-wave seismogram method. Earthq. Spectra 33(3), 943–961 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miao, Y., Shi, Y., Wang, S.-Y.: Estimating near-surface shear wave velocity using the P-wave seismograms method in Japan. Earthq. Spectra 34(4), 1955–1971 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1193/011818EQS015M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kang, S., Kim, B., Park, H., Lee, J.: Automated procedure for estimating VS30 utilizing P-wave seismograms and its application to Japan. Eng. Geol. 264, 1–16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aki, K., Richards, P.G., Ellis, J. (ed.): Quantitative Seismology. University Science Books, Sausalito (2002). 700 p.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wald, L.A., Hutton, L.K., Given, D.D.: The southern California network bulletin: 1990–1993 summary. Seismol. Res. Lett. 66(1), 9–19 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rathje, E.M., Li, M.: Evaluation of the P-wave seismogram approach to estimate. U. S. Geological Survey Final Technical Report (2021). https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/external_grants/reports/G19AP00104.pdf

  13. Ahdi, S.K., Stewart, J.P., Ancheta, T.D., Kwak, D.Y., Mitra, D.: Development of Vs profile database and proxy-based models for Vs30 prediction in the Pacific Northwest region of North America. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 107(4), 1781–1801 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rathje, E., et al.: DesignSafe: a new cyberinfrastructure for natural hazards engineering. ASCE Nat. Hazards Rev. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000246

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meibai Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, M., Rathje, E.M. (2022). An Evaluation of \({{\varvec{V}}}_{{{\varvec{SZ}}}}\) Estimates from the P-wave Seismogram Method for Sites in California. In: Wang, L., Zhang, JM., Wang, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Beijing 2022). PBD-IV 2022. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_70

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics