Skip to main content

Abstract

Site amplification models are widely used with ground prediction equations to estimate ground motion intensity measures. The time-averaged shear wave velocity of top 30 m (VS30) is the primary site proxy in site amplification models. A large number of models have been developed for a range of site conditions. However, the simplified nature of all models produce large residuals compared with the computed responses. The prediction accuracy of the models can be greatly enhanced through use of machine learning technique. In this study, the outputs of nonlinear one-dimensional site response analyses are used to train the deep neural network (DNN) model. The linear and nonlinear components are separately trained. The comparisons highlight that the DNN model successfully captures the amplification characteristics of the shallow bedrock sites and produces significantly lower residual compared with the available simulation based model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hashash, Y.M., Park, D.: Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment. Eng. Geol. 62(1–3), 185–206 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rota, M., Lai, C., Strobbia, C.: Stochastic 1D site response analysis at a site in central Italy. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 31(4), 626–639 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hashash, Y., Musgrove, M., Harmon, J., et al. DEEPSOIL 7.0, user manual. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nair, V., Hinton, G.E.: Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines. In: presented at: 27th International Conference on Machine Learning; Haifa, Israel (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Glorot, X., Bengio, Y.: Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In: JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, pp. 249–256 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kingma, D.P., Adam, B.J.: A method for stochastic optimization. presented at: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015; May 7–9; San Diego, CA, USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aaqib, M., Park, D., Adeel, M.B., Hashash, Y.M.A., Ilhan, O.: Simulation-based site amplification model for shallow bedrock sites in Korea. Earthq. Spectra 37(3), 1900–1930 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duhee Park .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Park, D., Lee, Y., Roh, H., Kang, J. (2022). Prediction of Site Amplification of Shallow Bedrock Sites Using Deep Neural Network Model. In: Wang, L., Zhang, JM., Wang, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Beijing 2022). PBD-IV 2022. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics