Skip to main content

Abstract

Fragility curves for structures are typically calculated considering fixed-base structures, i.e., neglecting the interaction between soil, foundation, and structure (SFSI). The state-of-the-art literature proves that considering foundation flexibility, especially for structures resting on soft soil, may lead to different fragility or loss estimates than the fixed-base-on-rock assumption. Including these effects on the city-scale vulnerability analysis is considered a challenging task due to the high exposure concentration and complexity of all the interacting urban systems. For this reason, large-scale analyses are commonly carried out applying existing fragility curves which may have been assessed not correctly accounting for the variation in frequency and amplitude contents imposed by each site’s local geotechnical and topographic conditions. To this aim, a new simplified methodology is proposed in this study to perform an urban-scale vulnerability assessment of structures considering the influence of SFSI and local site-effects. The applicability of the proposed approach is based on globally available data regarding the soil parameters, the foundation, and the building taxonomy. The main findings demonstrate that the conventional way of calculating fragility curves may lead to an incorrect evaluation of the seismic risk, especially in soft soil formations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sáez, E., Lopez-Caballero, F., Modaressi-Farahmand-Razavi, A.: Effect of the inelastic dynamic soil-structure interaction on the seismic vulnerability assessment. Struct. Saf. 33(1), 51–63 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rajeev, P., Tesfamariam, S.: Seismic fragilities of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames with consideration of soil structure interaction. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 40, 78–86 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pitilakis, K.D., Karapetrou, S.T., Fotopoulou, S.D.: Consideration of aging and SSI effects on seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 12(4), 1755–1776 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9575-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karapetrou, S.T., Fotopoulou, S.D., Pitilakis, K.D.: Seismic vulnerability assessment of high-rise non-ductile RC buildings considering soil-structure interaction effects. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 73, 42–57 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Silva, F.: Influence of soil-structure interaction on the site-specific seismic demand to masonry towers. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 131, 106023 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Petridis, C., Pitilakis, D.: Fragility curve modifiers for reinforced concrete dual buildings, including nonlinear site effects and soil–structure interaction. Earthquake Spectra 36(4), 1930–1951 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cavalieri, F., Correia, A.A., Crowley, H., Pinho, R.: Dynamic soil-structure interaction models for fragility characterization of buildings with shallow foundations’. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 132, 106004 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Amendola, C., Pitilakis, D.: State-of-the-art fragility curves of typical RC and masonry structures considering SFSI and aging effects. Project number 813137 URBASIS-EU New challenges for Urban Engineering Seismology (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Risi, R., Penna, A., Simonelli, A.L.: Seismic risk at urban scale: the role of site response analysis. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 123, 320–336 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Amendola, C., Pitilakis, D.: A new methodology for seismic risk assessment of urban areas including soil-structure-interaction and local site effects. Submitted (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mazzoni, S., Mckenna, F., Scott, M.H., Fenves, G.L.: The Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSEES) User Command-Language Manual (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jalayer, F., Ebrahimian, H., Miano, A., Manfredi, G., Sezen, H.: Analytical fragility assessment using unscaled ground motion records. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam. 46(15), 2639–2663 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D’ayala, D.F., Vamvatsikos, D., Porter, K.: GEM guidelines for analytical vulnerability assessment of low/mid-rise buildings, vulnerability global component project (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. NIST. Soil-structure interaction for building structures. Technical report, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. CEN Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Technical report. European Committee for Standardization (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. d’Onofrio, A., Silvestri, F.: Influence of micro-structure on small-strain stiffness and damping of fine-grained soil and effects on local site response. In: International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, vol. 15, pp. 0–6. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, Z., Lu, J., Elgamal, A.: OpenSees soil models and solid-fluid fully coupled elements. User’s Manual. Ver. 1, 27 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Veletsos, A.S., Meek, J.W.: Dynamic behaviour of building-foundation systems’. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam. 3(2), 121–138 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Martins, L., Silva, V.: Development of a fragility and vulnerability model for global seismic risk analyses. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 19(15), 6719–6745 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00885-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Paolucci, R., Mazzieri, I., Smerzini, C., Stupazzini, M.: Physics-based earthquake ground shaking scenarios in large urban areas. In: Ansal, A. (ed.) Perspectives on European earthquake engineering and seismology. GGEE, vol. 34, pp. 331–359. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07118-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Amendola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Amendola, C., Pitilakis, D. (2022). Urban Scale Fragility Assessment of Structures Considering Soil-Structure-Interaction. In: Wang, L., Zhang, JM., Wang, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Beijing 2022). PBD-IV 2022. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_124

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics