Skip to main content

Progress Testing in Written Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Written Assessment in Medical Education

Abstract

Progress testing (PT) is a special written test used to assess the progress of all students enrolled in an academic program toward achieving the cognitive component of the program learning outcomes. All students at all academic levels sit for this exam concurrently at regular intervals. It is used in medical and health professions education (HPE) as a tool to track the knowledge growth of HPE students during their learning process of a program. The purpose is to assist students in understanding what is expected of them at the end of the program and in identifying their knowledge gaps.

By the end of this chapter, the reader is expected to be able to

  1. 1.

    Comprehend the concept of PT and the rationale behind it.

  2. 2.

    Recognize the process of designing, implementing, and evaluating PT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vleuten CPMVD, Verwijnen GM, Wijnen WHFW. Fifteen years of experience with progress testing in a problem-based learning curriculum. Medical Teacher. 1996;18(2):103-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsuyama Y, Muijtjens AMM, Kikukawa M, Stalmeijer R, Murakami R, Ishikawa S, et al. A first report of East Asian students’ perception of progress testing: a focus group study. BMC Medical Education. 2016;16(1):245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Findyartini A, Werdhani RA, Iryani D, Rini EA, Kusumawati R, Poncorini E, et al. Collaborative progress test (cPT) in three medical schools in Indonesia: The validity, reliability and its use as a curriculum evaluation tool. Medical Teacher. 2015;37(4):366-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Muijtjens AM, Schuwirth LW, Cohen-Schotanus J, van der Vleuten CP. Differences in knowledge development exposed by multi-curricular progress test data. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2008;13(5):593-605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wrigley W, Van Der Vleuten CP, Freeman A, Muijtjens A. A systemic framework for the progress test: strengths, constraints and issues: AMEE Guide No. 71. Medical teacher. 2012;34(9):683-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dion V, St-Onge C, Bartman I, Touchie C, Pugh D. Written-Based Progress Testing: A Scoping Review. Academic Medicine. 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McHarg J, Bradley P, Chamberlain S, Ricketts C, Searle J, McLachlan JC. Assessment of progress tests. Medical Education. 2005;39(2):221-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pugh D, Bhanji F, Cole G, Dupre J, Hatala R, Humphrey-Murto S, et al. Do OSCE progress test scores predict performance in a national high-stakes examination? Medical Education. 2016;50(3):351-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schauber S, Nouns ZM. Using the cumulative deviation method for cross-institutional benchmarking in the Berlin progress test. Medical Teacher. 2010;32(6):471-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Norman G, Neville A, Blake JM, Mueller B. Assessment steers learning down the right road: Impact of progress testing on licensing examination performance. Medical Teacher. 2010;32(6):496-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. The use of progress testing. Perspectives on medical education. 2012;1(1):24-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pugh D, Regehr G. Taking the sting out of assessment: is there a role for progress testing? Medical Education. 2016;50(7):721-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Y, Henning M, Yielder J, Jones R, Wearn A, Weller J. Progress testing in the medical curriculum: students approaches to learning and perceived stress. BMC Medical Education. 2015;15.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Albanese M, Case SM. Progress testing: critical analysis and suggested practices. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2016;21(1):221-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yielder J, Wearn A, Chen Y, Henning MA, Weller J, Lillis S, et al. A qualitative exploration of student perceptions of the impact of progress tests on learning and emotional wellbeing. BMC Medical Education. 2017;17(1):148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ricketts C, Freeman A, Pagliuca G, Coombes L, Archer J. Difficult decisions for progress testing: How much and how often? Medical Teacher. 2010;32(6):513-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reberti AG, Monfredini NH, Ferreira Filho OF, Andrade DFd, Pinheiro CEA, Silva JC. Progress Test in Medical School: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica. 2020;44.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bandaranayake RC. Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37. Medical Teacher. 2008;30(9-10):836-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kerfoot BP, Shaffer K, McMahon GT, Baker H, Kirdar J, Kanter S, et al. Online “Spaced Education Progress-Testing” of Students to Confront Two Upcoming Challenges to Medical Schools. Academic Medicine. 2011;86(3):300-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhakta B, Tennant A, Horton M, Lawton G, Andrich D. Using item response theory to explore the psychometric properties of extended matching questions examination in undergraduate medical education. BMC Medical Education. 2005;5(1):9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Janssen-Brandt XMC, Muijtjens AMM, Sluijsmans DMA. Toward a better judgment of item relevance in progress testing. BMC Medical Education. 2017;17(1):151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Finucane P, Flannery D, Keane D, Norman G. Cross-institutional progress testing: feasibility and value to a new medical school. Medical Education. 2010;44(2):184-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Görlich D, Friederichs H. Using longitudinal progress test data to determine the effect size of learning in undergraduate medical education – a retrospective, single-center, mixed model analysis of progress testing results. Medical Education Online. 2021;26(1):1972505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Muijtjens AM, Timmermans I, Donkers J, Peperkamp R, Medema H, Cohen-Schotanus J, et al. Flexible electronic feedback using the virtues of progress testing. Medical Teacher. 2010;32(6):491-5.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Vleuten, C. P. M. V. D., Verwijnen, G. M. & Wijnen, W. H. F. W. (1996). Fifteen years of experience with progress testing in a problem-based learning curriculum. Medical Teacher, 18(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599609034142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, W., Van Der Vleuten, C. P., Freeman, A. & Muijtjens, A. (2012). A systemic framework for the progress test: strengths, constraints and issues: AMEE Guide No. 71. Medical teacher, 34(9), 683–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mona Hmoud AlSheikh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

AlSheikh, M.H., Alamro, A., Wadi, M.M. (2023). Progress Testing in Written Assessment. In: Gasmalla, H.E.E., Ibrahim, A.A.M., Wadi, M.M., Taha, M.H. (eds) Written Assessment in Medical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11752-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11752-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11751-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11752-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics