Skip to main content

Critical Phenomenology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Phenomenology

Part of the book series: Palgrave Philosophy Today ((PPT))

  • 1477 Accesses

Abstract

Phenomenology has always extended into a vast array of questions that are the primary concern of other disciplines, including fields such as psychiatry and medicine, education, literature, architecture and design, theology, and ethics. This chapter focuses on a relatively newly defined area of application: critical hermeneutics, which concerns social and political issues. After reviewing some early social and political thought in phenomenology, the chapter explores the concept of critical phenomenology, some classic works by Franz Fanon and Iris Marion Young, and the recent analysis of solitary confinement by Lisa Guenther. We conclude by discussing the role of phenomenology in critical phenomenology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Husserl himself wrote unpublished reflections on community and related issues. See Drummond (2000); Hart (1992); Schuhmann (1988); Steeves (1998).

  2. 2.

    It’s not the first use of the phrase. The year before, Kennedy (1986) published a widely cited article entitled ‘Freedom and constraint in adjudication: A Critical phenomenology’, but there is very little of phenomenology in this article, and the term ‘critical’ has the general significance of the term as it is used in critical legal studies. A much better candidate for a first mention of ‘critical phenomenology’ can be found in a couple of articles published a decade earlier by Harold Reid. ‘American social science in the politics of time and the crisis of technocorporate society: toward a critical phenomenology’ (1973), and ‘Critical phenomenology and the dialectical foundations of social change’ (1977). I think his project comes close to the senses of critical phenomenology as it is currently understood. It’s possible that Reid, in the social science context devised the phrase after reading John O’Neill’s, 1972 article, ‘Can phenomenology be critical?’

  3. 3.

    There is some debate about Fanon’s stance on violence. Hannah Arendt writes: ‘Sartre, who in his preface to Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth goes much farther in his glorification of violence …, farther than Fanon himself, whose argument he wishes to bring to its conclusion…. I am using this work [Wretched of the Earth] because of its great influence on the present student generation [the 1960s]. Fanon himself, however, is much more doubtful about violence than his admirers. It seems that only the book’s first chapter, ‘Concerning Violence’, has been widely read. Fanon knows of the ‘unmixed and total brutality [which], if not immediately combatted, invariably leads to the defeat of the movement within a few weeks’ (Arendt, 1970, On Violence, p. 11, 14). Homi Bhabha, in the Forward to the English translation of The Wretched of the Earth, notes that Bobby Seale and Huey Newton’s reading of Wretched in 1966 inspired the founding of the Black Nationalist Party and the Black Panthers. Steve Biko, in Durban, South Africa circulated the Wretched to his friends. Bobby Sands (the IRA hunger protester) read Fanon’s book in the H-block prison in Belfast. And Ali Shariati, a leader of student militants in Iran (supporter of the Iranian revolution led by the Ayatollah Khomeini) translated the Wretched into Persian (Bhabha in Fanon 2007). Finally, Lisa Guenther argues: ‘The Wretched of the Earth is often read as an endorsement and justification of anticolonial violence, in part because of Sartre’s preface to the book…. But Fanon’s own views on the role of violence in revolutionary action are much more complex than this. While violent force may be a necessary, or at least an inevitable, response to the brute force of colonialism, it is by no means sufficient for the creation of a new humanity and a new humanism. What is needed, in addition to strategic acts of violence, is a transformation of the collective consciousness or “brain” of the people. This is a cultural and artistic project as well as a material one’ (Guenther, 2013, 58–59). Also see Kebede (2001).

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, other. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alcoff, L. M. (1999). Towards a phenomenology of racial embodiment. Radical Philosophy, 95, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1970). On Violence. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ataria, Y. (2015). Dissociation during trauma: The ownership-agency tradeoff model. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 1037–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ataria, Y., & Gallagher, S. (2015). Somatic apathy: Body disownership in the context of torture. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 46(1), 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, A. (1985). Postures of the mInd: Essays on mInd and morals. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M. (2020). Heteronormativity. In G. Weiss, A. V. Weiss, & G. Salamon (Eds.), 50 concepts for a critical phenomenology (pp. 161–168). Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2006). Sexual difference as a question of ethics: Alterities in the flesh in Irigaray and Merleau-Ponty. In D. Olkowski & G. Weiss (Eds.), Feminist interpretations of Maurice Merleau-Ponty. University Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, C. (1957). American notes and pictures from Italy. Oxford University Press. (Originally published 1842).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, J. J. (2000). Political community. In K. Thompson & L. Embree (Eds.), Phenomenology of the political (pp. 29–53). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (1986). Black skin, white masks (C. L. Markmann, Trans.). Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (2007). The wretched of the earth. Grove/Atlantic, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, H. (2020). The habit body. In G. Weiss, A. V. Weiss, & G. Salamon (Eds.), 50 concepts for a critical phenomenology (pp. 155–160). Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2013). A pattern theory of self. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(443), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2014). The cruel and unusual phenomenology of solitary confinement. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 585. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. R. (1996). The black and the body politic: Fanon’s existential phenomenological critique of psychoanalysis. In L. R. Gordon, T. D. Sharpley-Whiting, & R. T. White (Eds.), Fanon: A critical reader (pp. 74–84). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, L. (2013). Solitary confinement: Social death and its afterlives. University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, L. (2021). Six senses of critique for critical phenomenology. Puncta. Journal of Critical Phenomenology, 4(2), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. G. (1992). The person and the common life: Studies in a Husserlian social ethics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1973). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität III, Husserliana XV. Martinus Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy - second book (R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking University lectures. Albany: Suny Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, L. (1993). An ethics of sexual difference (C. Burke & G. C. Gill, Trans.). Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karera, A. (2019). Frantz Fanon and the future of critical phenomenology in an anti-black world. University of Memphis Philosophy Colloquium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kebede, M. (2001). The rehabilitation of violence and the violence of rehabilitation: Fanon and colonialism. Journal of Black Studies, 31(5), 539–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (1986). Freedom and constraint in adjudication: A critical phenomenology. J. Legal Education, 36, 518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laferté-Coutu, M. (2021). What is phenomenological about critical phenomenology? Guenther, Al-Saji, and the Husserlian account of attitudes. Puncta. Journal of Critical Phenomenology, 4(2), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugones, M. (1987). Playfulness “World”-Travelling and Loving Perception. Hypatia 2(2), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01062.x

  • Lugones, M. (2003). Pilgrimages/peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrato, S. (2020). Intercorporeality. In G. Weiss, A. V. Weiss, & G. Salamon (Eds.), 50 concepts for a critical phenomenology (pp. 197–201). Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, W. L. (1991). Sartre’s political theory. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, A. (1997). ‘No longer in a future heaven’: Gender, race, and nationalism. In A. McClintock, A. Mufti, & E. Shohat (Eds.), Dangerous liaisons: Gender, nation, and postcolonial perspectives. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1969). Humanism and terror: An essay on the communist problem (J. O’Neill, Trans.). Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1973). Adventures of the dialectic (J. Bien, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1987). Signs (R. C. McCleary, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. (1972). Can phenomenology be critical? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, M. (2016). In-between: Latina feminist phenomenology, multiplicity, and the self. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peperzak, A. T. (2000). Intersubjectivity and community. In K. Thompson & L. Embree (Eds.), Phenomenology of the political (pp. 55–64). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, H. G. (1973). American social science in the politics of time and the crisis of technocorporate society: Toward a critical phenomenology. Politics and Society, 3(2), 201–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, H. G. (1977). Critical phenomenology and the dialectical foundations of social change. Dialectical Anthropology, 2(2), 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinach, A. (1913). Die apriorischen Grundlagen des burgerlichen Rechtes. Jahrbuch fur Phlosophie und phanomenologische Forschung 1, 685–847; English translation: The apriori foundations of the civil law. Trans. J. F. Crosby, Aletheia 3 (1983), 2–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, E. (2022). Moving bodies: Cognitive functions and the world that we made. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, G. (2018). What’s critical about critical phenomenology? Journal of Critical Phenomenology, 1(1), 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1948). Orphée noir: Preface to Anthologie de la nouvelle poésie nègre et malgache. Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J-P. (1976), Critique of dialectical reason (Vol. 1, A. Sheridan-Smith, Trans.). New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J-P. (2001). Colonialism and neocolonialism (A. Haddout, S. Brewer & T. McWilliams, Trans.). Routledge, [1964].

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuhmann, K. (1988). Husserls Staatsphilosophie. Karl Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1973). Symbol, reality and society. In Collected papers volume I: The problem of social reality. Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, F. A. (2010). Review of Ann Ferguson and Mechthild Nagel (Eds.), Dancing with Iris: The Philosophy of Iris Marion Young, Oxford University Press, 2009, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/dancing-with-iris-the-philosophy-of-iris-marion-young/

  • Smith, P. S. (2006). The effects of solitary confinement on prison inmates: A brief history and review of the literature. Crime and Justice, 34(1), 441–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Bernard, J., & Gallagher, S. (in press). Race and the implicit aspects of embodied social interaction. In R. Thompson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy & implicit cognition. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stawarska, B. (2006). From the body proper to flesh: Merleau-Ponty on intersubjectivity. In D. Olkowski & G. Weiss (Eds.), Feminist interpretations of Maurice Merleau-Ponty (pp. 91–106). University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steeves, H. P. (1998). Founding community: A phenomenological-ethical inquiry. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. (1922). Individuum und Gemeinschaft. Beitrage zur philosophischen Begrundung der Psychologie und der Geistesvvissenshaften. Zweite Abhandlung. Jahrbuch fur Phlosophie und phanomenologische Forschung, 5, 116–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. (1925). Eine Untersuchung Uber den Staat. Jahrbuch fiir Philosophie und phdnomenologische Forschung, 7, 1–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, E. W. (1966). The upright posture. In E. W. Straus (Ed.), Phenomenological psychology (pp. 137–165). Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, G. (2015). The normal, the natural, and the normative: A Merleau-Pontian legacy to feminist theory, critical race theory, and disability studies. Continental Philosophy Review, 48(1), 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, G., Salamon, G., & Murphy, A. V. (2019). Concepts for a critical phenomenology (Vol. 50). Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welton, D., & Silverman, H. J. (Eds.). (1987). Critical and dialectical phenomenology (Vol. 12). Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willen, S. S. (2007). Toward a critical phenomenology of “illegality”: State power, criminalization, and abjectivity among undocumented migrant workers in Tel Aviv, Israel. International migration, 45(3), 8–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1980). Throwing like a girl: A phenomenology of feminine body comportment, motility and spatiality. Human Studies, 3(2), 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gallagher, S. (2022). Critical Phenomenology. In: Phenomenology. Palgrave Philosophy Today. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11586-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics