Abstract
Effective flight capacity is a crucial survival attribute of volant animals. Several vertebrate clades have acquired gliding capabilities and at least three of them independently acquired powered flight. Contrastingly, wings were probably acquired only once by pterygotan insects. Despite this, insects have developed a great variety of structural approaches that have diversified their collective flight capacity. Flight was a key contributor to their diversification during the Late Carboniferous (at least 330 Ma), and flying insects have remained the most diverse animal clade since then. Among pterygotans, representatives of the superorder Odonatoptera, which includes the extant Odonata, have developed impressive performance associated with the highly complex morphological structure of their wing venation. Some venation patterns, such as the nodus, discoidal complex, and arculus, were acquired only once, whereas others have been convergently acquired several times. One example of a pattern acquired more than once is the sclerotized pterostigma, convergently appearing in the Permian Protanisoptera and its sister group, the Discoidalia, these comprising the modern Odonata. All odonatopterans with broad wings were confronted by a major problem, that of ‘how to strengthen the basal third of the wing’ to prevent it from breaking longitudinally. At least eight different convergent ‘solutions’ have been ‘adopted’ that have resulted in the incorporation of structures oriented perpendicular to the main axis of the wing. Additionally, several clades within the Odonatoptera have convergently developed petiolated wings, adapted for flying in cluttered environments. The width and length of the petiole can vary greatly, with the most impressive ones being those of the ‘giant’ Permian-Triassic Triadophlebiomorpha. This great morphological disparity represents ‘variations on a theme’ of the already complex wing venation established by the first Carboniferous odonatopterans. It is possible that some of the ‘solutions’ arrived at by extinct clades allowed for performance that was more effective than that of modern odonatans. Many of these groups flourished and co-existed with the ancestors of modern taxa for millions of years. Extant odonatans have been adopted as models for the bio-mimetic development of small drones. The wing patterns of extinct clades should also be investigated for their potential for bio-mimetic inspiration and application.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amador, L. I., Almeida, F. C., & Giannini, N. P. (2020). Evolution of traditional aerodynamic variables in bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) within a comprehensive phylogenetic framework. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 27, 549–561.
Bechly, G. (1996) Morphologische Untersuchungen am Flügelgeäder der rezenten Libellen und deren Stammgruppenvertreter (Insecta; Pterygota; Odonata), unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der phylogenetischen Systematik und des Grundplanes der Odonata. Petalura, Special Volume 2, 402 p.
Bomphrey, R. J., Walker, S. M., & Taylor, G. K. (2009). The typical flight performance of blowflies: Measuring the normal performance envelope of Calliphora vicina using a novel corner-cube arena. PLoS One, 4(11), e7852.
Brodsky, A. K. (1994). The evolution of insect flight. Oxford University Press, i-xiii + 1-229.
Chitsaz, N., Marian, R., Chitsaz, A., & Chahl, J. S. (2020). Parametric and statistical study of the wing geometry of 75 species of Odonata. Applied Sciences, 10(15) (5389), 1–17.
Engel, M. S., Davis, S. R., & Prokop, J. (2013). Insect wings: The evolutionary development of Nature’s first flyers. In: A. Minelli, G. Boxshall, & G. Fusco (Eds.), Arthropod biology and evolution: Molecules, development, morphology (pp. 269–298). Springer, ix + 532 pp.
Fleck, G., & Nel, A. (2003). Revision of the Mesozoic family Aeschnidiidae (Odonata: Anisoptera). Zoologica, 153, 1–180.
Fraser, F. C. (1957). A reclassification of the order Odonata, based on some new interpretations of the venation of the dragonfly wing. Handbook of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, 12, 1–133.
Goldsworthy, G. J., & Wheeler, C. H. (1989). Insect flight. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, i-vii + 1-371.
Hatch, G. (1966). Structures and mechanics of the dragonfly pterothorax. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 59, 702–714.
Jacquelin, L., Desutter-Grandcolas, L., Chintauan-Marquier, I., Boistel, R., Zheng, D., Prokop, J., & Nel, A. (2018). New insights on basivenal sclerites using 3D tools and homology of wing veins in Odonatoptera (Insecta). Scientific Reports, 8, 1–7.
Nel, A., Martínez-Delclòs, X., Paicheler, J.-C., & Henrotay, M. (1993). Les ‘Anisozygoptera’ fossiles. Phylogénie et classification (Odonata). Martinia, Numéro Hors Série, 3, 1–311.
Nel, A., Fleck, G., Garrouste, R., Gand, G., Lapeyrie, J., Bybee, S. M., & Prokop, J. (2009). Revision of Permo-Carboniferous griffenflies (Insecta: Odonatoptera: Meganisoptera) based upon new species and redescription of selected poorly known taxa from Eurasia. Palaeontographica (A), 289, 89–121.
Nel, A., Bechly, G., Prokop, J., Béthoux, O., & Fleck, G. (2012a). Systematics and evolution of Paleozoic and Mesozoic damselfly-like Odonatoptera of the ‘Protozygopteran’ grade. Journal of Paleontology, 86, 81–104.
Nel, A., Prokop, J., Nel, P., Grandcolas, P., Huang, D.-y., Roques, P., Guilbert, E., Dostál, O., & Szwedo, J. (2012b). Traits and evolution of wing venation pattern in paraneopteran insects. Journal of Morphology, 273, 480–506.
Nel, A., Prokop, J., Pecharová, M., Engel, M. S., & Garrouste, R. (2018). Palaeozoic giant dragonflies were hawker predators. Scientific Reports, 8, 1–5.
Nel, A., Roques, P., Prokop, J., & Garrouste, R. (2019). A new, extraordinary ‘damselfly-like’ Odonatoptera from the Pennsylvanian of the Avion locality in Pas-de-Calais, France (Insecta: ‘Exopterygota’). Alcheringa, 43, 241–245.
Palmer, C., & Dyke, G. (2012). Constraints on the wing morphology of pterosaurs. Proceedings of the Royal Society, (B) Biological Sciences, 279, 1218–1224.
Pecharová, M., & Prokop, J. (2018). The morphology of mouthparts, wings and genitalia of Paleozoic insect families Protohymenidae and Scytohymenidae reveals new details and supposed function. Arthropod Structure and Development, 47, 117–129.
Phan, H. V., Truong, Q. T., & Park, H. C. (2019). Extremely large sweep amplitude enables high wing loading in giant hovering insects. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ab3d55
Phillips, N., Knowles, K., & Bomphrey, R. J. (2017). Petiolate wings: Effects on the leading-edge vortex in flapping flight. Interface Focus, 7(1), 20160084.
Rajabi, H., & Gorb, S. N. (2020). How do dragonfly wings work? A brief guide to functional roles of wing structural components. International Journal of Odonatology, 23, 23–30.
Riek, E. F., & Kukalová-Peck, J. (1984). A new interpretation of dragonfly wing venation based upon Early Carboniferous fossils from Argentina (Insecta: Odonatoidea) and basic characters states in pterygote wings. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 62, 1150–1166.
Salami, E., Ward, T. A., Montazer, E., & Ghazali, N. N. N. (2019). A review of aerodynamic studies on dragonfly flight. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 233, 6519–6537.
Steyer, J. S. (2009) La terre avant les dinosaures. Editions Belin – Pour la Science, 205 p.
Suarez-Tovar, C. M., & Sarmiento, C. E. (2016). Beyond the wing planform: Morphological differentiation between migratory and non-migratory dragonfly species. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 29, 690–703.
Williams, H. J., Shepard, E. L. C., Holton, M. D., Alarcón, P. A. E., Wilson, R. P., & Lambertucci, S. A. (2020). Physical limits of flight performance in the heaviest soaring bird. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117, 1–7.
Wootton, R. J. (1979). Function, homology and terminology in insect wing. Systematic Entomology, 4, 81–93.
Wootton, R. J., & Ennos, A. R. (1989). The implications of function on the origin and homologies of the dipterous wing. Systematic Entomology, 14, 507–520.
Wootton, R. J., Kukalová-Peck, J., Newman, J. S., & Muzon, J. (1998). Smart engineering in the Mid-Carboniferous: How well could Paleozoic dragonflies fly? Science, 282, 749–751.
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank Dr. Günter Bechly, Dr. Jakub Prokop, and Dr. Anthony P. Russell for their helpful remarks on the first version of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nel, A., Piney, B. (2023). Odonatopteran Approaches to the Challenges of Flight: Convergence of Responses Subject to a Common Set of Morphological Constraints. In: Bels, V.L., Russell, A.P. (eds) Convergent Evolution. Fascinating Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11441-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11441-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11440-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11441-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)