Skip to main content

2D/3D Quasi-Intramodal Registration of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Images

  • 533 Accesses

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS,volume 13386)

Abstract

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (qMRI) is backed by extensive validation in research literature but has seen limited use in clinical practice because of long acquisition times, lack of standardization and no statistical models for analysis. Our research focuses on developing a novel quasi-intermodal 2D slice to 3D volumetric pipeline for an emerging qMR technology that aims to bridge the gap between research and practice. The two-part method first initializes the registration using a 3D reconstruction technique then refines it using a 3D to 2D projection technique. Intermediate results promise feasibility and efficacy of our proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fedorov, A., et al.: 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn. Reson. Imaging 30(9), 1323–1341 (2012). https://www.slicer.org/

  2. Avants, B.B., Tustison, N.J., Stauffer, M., Song, G., Wu, B., Gee, J.C.: The insight toolkit image registration framework. Front. Neuroinf. 8, 44 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Bashir, A., Gray, M.L., Burstein, D.: Gd-dtpa2- as a measure of cartilage degradation. Magn. Reson. Med. 36, 665–673 (1996)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Cloos, M.A., Assländer, J., Abbas, B., Fishbaugh, J., Babb, J.S., Gerig, G., Lattanzi, R.: Rapid radial t1 and t2 mapping of the hip articular cartilage with magnetic resonance fingerprinting. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 50(3), 810–815 (2019)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferrante, E., Paragios, N.: Slice-to-volume medical image registration: a survey. Med. Image Anal. 39, 101–123 (2017)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Imiya, A., Sato, K.: Shape from silhouettes in discrete space. In: Gagalowicz, A., Philips, W. (eds.) CAIP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3691, pp. 296–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11556121_37

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Jazrawi, L.M., Alaia, M.J., Chang, G., Fitzgerald, E.F., Recht, M.P.: Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage. J. Am. Acad. Orthopaedic Surg. 19, 420–429 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Jazrawi, L.M., Bansal, A.: Biochemical-based MRI in diagnosis of early osteoarthritis. Imaging Med. 4(1), 01 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Katz, J.N., et al.: Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the united states medicare population. JBJS 83(11), 1622–1629 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Lattanzi, R., et al.: Detection of cartilage damage in femoroacetabular impingement with standardized dgemric at 3 t. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 22(3), 447–456 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma, D., et al.: Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature 495(7440), 187 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Markelj, P., Tomaževič, D., Likar, B., Pernuš, F.: A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions. Med. Image Anal. 16(3), 642–661 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2010.03.005, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841510000368, computer Assisted Interventions

  13. Pieper, S., Halle, M., Kikinis, R.: 3D slicer. In: 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821), pp. 632–635. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pieper, S., Lorensen, B., Schroeder, W., Kikinis, R.: The NA-MIC kit: ITK, VTK, pipelines, grids and 3D slicer as an open platform for the medical image computing community. In: 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006, pp. 698–701. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pluim, J.P., Maintz, J.A., Viergever, M.A.: Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22(8), 986–1004 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Schneider, D.C.: Shape from silhouette, pp. 725–726. Springer, Boston (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-31439-6_206

  17. Venn, M., Maroudas, A.: Chemical composition and swelling of normal and osteoarthrotic femoral head cartilage. I. Chemical composition. Ann. Rheumatic Dis. 36, 121–129 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, Y., Jordan, J.M.: Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Clin. Geriatric Med. 26(3), 355–369 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Batool Abbas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 3.
figure 3

Typical SFS reconstruction procedure as illustrated in [6] (a) Camera captures a silhouette (b) The silhouette defines a visual cone. (c) The intersection of two visual cones contains an object. (d) A visual hull of an object is the intersection of many visual cones

Fig. 4.
figure 4

Actual appearance of the six 2D qMR scans acquired from a volunteer

Fig. 5.
figure 5

Expected appearance of the six 2D qMR scans

Fig. 6.
figure 6

The image on the far right depicts the localizer plane and so it is unchanging in both sets of emulations. The images on the center and left are captured using two planes orthogonal to the localizer plane and to each other. The initial locations of these planes was chosen arbitrarily but kept constant in both this and Fig. 7. This set produced via rotation by 90\(^{\circ }\) clockwise

Fig. 7.
figure 7

The image on the far right depicts the localizer plane and so it is unchanging in both sets of emulations. The images on the center and left are captured using two planes orthogonal to the localizer plane and to each other. The initial locations of these planes was chosen arbitrarily but kept constant in both this and Fig. 6. This set produced via rotation by 45\(^{\circ }\) counter-clockwise

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abbas, B., Lattanzi, R., Petchprapa, C., Gerig, G. (2022). 2D/3D Quasi-Intramodal Registration of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Images. In: Hering, A., Schnabel, J., Zhang, M., Ferrante, E., Heinrich, M., Rueckert, D. (eds) Biomedical Image Registration. WBIR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13386. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11203-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11203-4_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11202-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11203-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)