Abstract
Soundfair Australia Ltd collaborated with Swinburne University’s Living Lab to create person-centred care measures that are routinely tracked alongside other success measures in hearing rehabilitation. A Living Lab approach was applied. Living Lab projects at their heart apply co-design in real-life contexts involving multiple stakeholders to achieve innovative products and services for the people involved—in this project, patients as well as staff providing the hearing rehabilitation service. To ensure applied innovative design solutions remain focused on the goal and needs of the end-users it is important to measure their impact and revise and improve both the measures and solutions on a regular basis. To come to relevant conclusions, data needs to be collated and interpreted against the original goals over time. This project aimed to develop a dashboard—an artificial intelligence infrastructure—to bring together the data. Here we report on (i) the process to ensure the right patient data was collected and fed into the system to achieve meaningful measures and (ii) the barriers that we faced when collating and interpreting the measures of the dashboard in practice. We suggest the barriers identified are common in the health sector. We advance the discussion of barriers as consideration points to improve and establish implementation of artificial intelligence in the health sector to improve person-centred care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
McMillan, S.S., Kendall, E., Sav, A., King, M.A., Whitty, J.A., Kelly, F., Wheeler, A.J.: Patient-centered approaches to health care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Med. Care Res. Rev. 70, 567–596 (2013)
Santana, M.J., Manalili, K., Jolley, R.J., et al.: How to practice person-centred care: a conceptual framework. Heal Expect 21, 429–440 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12640
Grenness, C., Hickson, L., Laplante-Lévesque, A., Davidson, B.: Patient-centred care: a review for rehabilitative audiologists. Int. J. Audiol. 53(2014). https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.847286
Håkansson Eklund, J., Holmström, I.K., Kumlin, T., et al.: “Same same or different?” A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care. Patient Educ. Couns. 102, 3–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.029
Ekman, I., Swedberg, K., Taft, C.: Person-centered care—ready for prime time. Cardiovasc Nurs. 10, 248–251 (2011)
Laplante-Lévesque, A., Hickson, L., Grenness, C.: An Australian survey of audiologists’ preferences for patient-centredness. Int. J. Audiol. 53(2014). https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.832418
Tai, S., Barr, C., Woodward-Kron, R.: Towards patient-centred communication: an observational study of supervised audiology student-patient hearing assessments. Int. J. Audiol. 58, 97–106 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1538574
Visser, F.S., Stappers, P.J., van der Lugt, R., Sanders, E.B.-N.: Context mapping: experiences from practice. CoDesign 1, 119–149 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880500135987
Robertson, T., Simonsen, J.: Participatory design: an introduction. In: Simonsen, J, Robertson, T. (eds.) International Handbook of Participatory Design, pp. 1–18. Routledge, New York, NY (2012)
Suchman, L.: Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press (2006)
Sanders, E.B.N., Stappers, P.J.: Convivial toolbox: Generative research for the front end of design, 1st edn. BIS, Amsterdam (2012)
Brandt, E., Binder, T., Sanders, E.B.-N.: Ways to engage telling, making and enacting. In: Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, pp. 145–181. Routledge, New York (2012)
Freeman, L.: Test and evaluation for artificial intelligence. Insight 23, 27–30 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/inst.12281
Lawrence, N.D.: Data Readiness Levels, pp. 1–10 (2017)
Ognjanović, L., Šendelj, R.: AI enhanced services in person-centred care in neurology. In: Karabegovi, I. (ed.) New Technologies, Development and Application III, pp. 522–529. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020)
Gyldenkaerne, C.H., From, G., Mønsted, T., Simonsen, J.: PD and the challenge of AI in health-care. ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Ser. 2, 26–29 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385138
Malmberg, L., Rodrigues, V., Lännerström, L., et al.: Service design as a transformational driver toward person-centered care in healthcare. Serv. Des. Serv. Think. Healthc. Hosp. Manag. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00749-2_1
Park, M., Giap, T.T.T., Jang, I., et al.: Listening to patients’ voices: applying the design-thinking method for teaching person-centered care to nursing students. Nurs. Forum. 57, 9–17 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12641
Ferguson, M., Leighton, P., Brandreth, M., Wharrad, H.: Development of a multimedia educational programme for first-time hearing aid users: a participatory design. Int J Audiol 57, 600–609 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1457803
Ehn, P.: Scandinavian design: on participation and skill. In: Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, pp. 41–77 (1993)
Carroll, J.M.: Dimensions of participation in simon’s design. Des. Issues 22, 3–18 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2006.22.2.3
Sanoff, H.: Community participation in riverfront development. CoDesign 1, 61–78 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880512331326022
Kusunoki, D.: Applying participatory design theory to designing evaluation methods. In: CHI ’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1895–1900. ACM, Austin, USA (2012)
Wright, M., Getta, A.D., Green, A.O., et al.: Co-designing health service evaluation tools that foreground first nation worldviews for better mental health and wellbeing outcomes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Heal. 18, 8555 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH18168555
Cooper, S., Cant, R., Waters, D., et al.: Measuring the quality of nursing clinical placements and the development of the placement evaluation tool (PET) in a mixed methods co-design project. BMC Nurs. 19, 1–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12912-020-00491-1/TABLES/5
Bjerring, J.C., Busch, J.: Artificial intelligence and patient-centered decision-making, 34, 349–371 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00391-6
Triberti, S., La, D.T., Sebri, V., et al.: Artificial intelligence in healthcare practice: how to tackle the “Human” challenge. In: Lim, C.-P., Chen, Y.-W., Vaidya, A., et al (eds.) Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare vol. 2: Practicalities and Prospects (2022)
Vilariño, F.: Unveiling the social impact of AI through living labs. In: Barth, J., Fotopoulou, E., Brauer, C. (eds.) (Forthcoming) Artificitial Intelligence and Innovation Management, p. 215/232. World Scientific (2022)
European Network of Open Living Labs: Social impact of artificial intelligence (AI)—action oriented task force. In: Digit. Living Lab Days 2020 Rep. (2020). https://issuu.com/enoll/docs/digital_living_lab_days_2020_report/s/11087058
Vollmer, S., Mateen, B.A., Bohner, G., et al.: Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for patient benefit: 20 critical questions on transparency, replicability, ethics, and effectiveness. BMJ 368, 1–11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6927
University of Gothenburg Centre for Person Centred Care.: Innovative standard for patient participation in person-centred care now available (2020). https://www.gu.se/en/gpcc/innovative-standard-for-patient-participation-in-person-centred-care-now-available. Accessed 7 Feb 2022
Sterling, L., Burrows, R., Barnet, B., et al.: Emotional factors for teleaudiology. In: Saunders, E. (ed.) Tele-Audiology and the Optimization of Hearing Healthcare Delivery, pp. 1–18. IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania (2019)
Dillon, H., James, A., Ginis, J.: Client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 8, 27–43 (1997)
de Koning, R., Egiz, A., Kotecha, J., et al.: Survey fatigue during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of neurosurgery survey response rates. Front Surg 8, 1–7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.690680
Gunning, D., Aha, D.W.: DARPAs_Explainable_Artificial.PDF. AI Mag. 44–58 (2019)
Grant DG (2018) Ethics and artificial intelligence in public health social work. Artif. Intell. Soc. Work 231–249.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108669016.015
Casacuberta, D., Vallverdú, J.: Biases in assigning emotions in patients due to multicultural. In: Lim, C.-P., Chen, Y.-W., Vaidya, A., et al. (eds.) Issues in Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare vol. 2: Practicalities and Prospects (2022)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Priday, G., Pedell, S., Vitkovic, J., Story, L. (2023). Tracking Person-Centred Care Experiences Alongside Other Success Measures in Hearing Rehabilitation. In: Lim, CP., Vaidya, A., Chen, YW., Jain, T., Jain, L.C. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Healthcare. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 228. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11154-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11154-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11153-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11154-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)