Skip to main content

Abstract

Ethics is a branch of philosophy that studies moral problems. This chapter of the SCS M&S Body of Knowledge starts with a broader look at how ethics are influencing technical disciplines in general before looking at ethics for computer simulation in more detail. It devotes a section on ethics for simulationists and analysts, as they often provide guidance for decision makers with significant consequences. The chapter concludes with the simulationists code of ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dancy J (1985) The role of imaginary cases in ethics. Pac Philos Q 66:141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Durán JM (2018) Computer simulations in science and engineering. In: Ethics and computer simulation. Springer, pp 171–188

    Google Scholar 

  3. Durán JM (2019) The ethics of climate simulations: the case of an F3 type tornado, forthcoming in Science an the Art of Simulation (Preprint: juanmduran.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/the-ethics-of-climate-simulations.pdf)

  4. Williamson TJ (2010) Predicting building performance: the ethics of computer simulation. Build Res Inf 38(4):401–410

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brey P (2008) Ethics and emerging technologies. In: Virtual reality and computer simulation. Palgrave Macmillan, pp 315–332

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ören T, Elzas MS et al (2002) Code of professional ethics for simulationists. In: Summer computer simulation conference, Society for Computer Simulation International

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van de Poel I, Royakkers L (2018) Ethics, technology, and engineering: an introduction. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Susses, UK

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wallace WA (ed) (1994) Ethics in modeling. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley, UK

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ören TI (2003) Rationale for a code of professional ethics for simulationists. In: Waite F et al William (ed) Proceedings of 2002 summer simulation conference, pp 428–433

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fowler HW (author), Crystal D (ed) (2010) A dictionary of modern English usage: the classic, 1st edn. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  11. Balebako R, O’Mahony A, Davis PK, Osoba OA (2019) Lessons from a workshop on ethical and privacy issues in social-behavioral research. In: Davis PK, O’Mahony A, Pfautz J (eds) Social-behavioral modeling for complex systems. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 49–61

    Google Scholar 

  12. Buolamwini J, Gebru T (2018) Bender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proc Mach Learn Res 81:77–91

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kitroeff N (2019) Boeing 737 Max simulators are in high demand. They are flawed. New York Times May 17. Accessed at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/17/business/boeing-737-max-simulators.html

  14. Federal Aviation Administration (2020) Preliminary summary of the FAA review of the Boeing 737 Max: return to service of the Boeing 737 MAX Aircraft, Version 1. https://www.faa.gov/news/media/attachments/737-MAX-RTS-Preliminary-Summary-v-1.pdf

  15. Tolk A (2017) Code of ethics. In: Tolk A, Ören T (eds) The profession of modeling and simulation: discipline, ethics, education, vocation, societies, and economics. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  16. McLeod J (1986) “But Mr. President—Is it ethical?” In: Wilson JR, Herniksen JO, Roberts SD (eds) Proceedings of 11986 winter simulation conference, pp 69–71

    Google Scholar 

  17. LeRon Shults F, Wildman WJ, Dignum V (2018) The ethics of computer modeling and simulation. In: Rabe M et al (eds) Proceedings of 2018 winter simulation conference, pp 4069–4083

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frankel MS (1989) Professional codes: why, how, and with what impact? J Bus Ethics 8(2):109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Busert P (2018) Examine the professional codes of design organizations. In: Proceedings of design research society

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parker DB (1968) Rules of ethics in information processing. Commun ACM 11(3):198–201

    Google Scholar 

  21. Amy DJ (1984) Why policy analysis and ethics are incompatible. J Policy Anal Manage 3(4):573–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolf CW (1980) Ethics and policy analysis, P-6463-2. RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ben Veniste G (1983) On a code of ethics for policy experts. J Policy Anal Manag 3(4):561–572

    Google Scholar 

  24. Boston J, Bradstock A (2011) Public policy: why ethics matters. ANU E Press

    Google Scholar 

  25. Davis PK (2002) Analytic architecture for capabilities-based planning, mission-system analysis, and transformation, MR1513. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Accessed at http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1513.html

  26. Davis PK (2014) Analysis to inform defense planning despite austerity, RR-482. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Accessed at http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR582.html

  27. Lempert RJ, Popper SW, Bankes SC (2003) Shaping the next one hundred years: new methods for quantitative long-term policy analysis. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Accessed at http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1626.html

  28. Marchau VAWJ, Walker WE, Bloemen PJT, Popper SW (eds) (2019) Decision making under deep uncertainty: from theory to practice. Springer, Cham, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  29. Davis PK, O’Mahony A, Pfautz J (eds) (2019) Social-behavioral modeling for complex systems. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nico Formanek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Formanek, N., Durán, J.M., Davis, P.K., Tolk, A., Ören, T. (2023). Ethics. In: Ören, T., Zeigler, B.P., Tolk, A. (eds) Body of Knowledge for Modeling and Simulation. Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11085-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11085-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11084-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11085-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics