Abstract
An important part of adapting what is sometimes referred to as “the world’s second oldest profession,” that is, diplomacy, to the twenty-first century, entails developing and applying the appropriate digital tools for the practice of statecraft. Paradoxically, the obstacles to this undertaking are often more cultural and organizational than technical. This is especially true for institutions steeped in ancient traditions like ministries of foreign affairs (MFAs), something that is very much the case in South American MFAs that have been somewhat late to the game of digital diplomacy. The purpose of this chapter is to track how MFAs in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Peru overcame resistance to change on this front, and examine what they did right and what they did wrong in so doing. Though this digitalization is still a work in progress, diplomats in these countries have come a long way, offering lessons for other MFAs from the Global South. The essay draws on data analysis extracted from Twitter, in-depth interviews with digital diplomats, and participant observation by one of the authors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
See the chapter by Farias and Lessa in this volume.
- 2.
The data utilized is publicly provided by Twiplomacy and missing data corresponds to 2019 and 2021.
References and Further Reading
Aguirre, D. 2020. “Public Diplomacy in Latin America: An Emerging Field of Practice?” In The Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, eds. N. Snow and N.J. Cull, 368–78. London: Routledge.
Aguirre, D., and C. Avila. 2020. “Propaganda and Populist Communication in Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela.” In The SAGE Handbook of Propaganda, eds. P. Baines, N. O’Shaughnessy, and N. Snow, 476–91. London: SAGE.
Aguirre, D., M. Erlandsen, and M.A. López. 2018a. Diplomacia pública digital: el contexto iberoamericano. San José: Editorial Escuela de Relaciones Internacionales Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica.
Aguirre, D., I. Manor, and A. Ramos. 2018b. “The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy: Towards a New Conceptual Framework.” Revista Mexicana de Política Exterior 113: 7–13.
Allison, G., and P. Zelikow. 1999. Essence of Decision: The Cuban Missile Crisis. New York: Longman.
Amorim Neto, O., and A. Malamud. 2020. “Presidential Delegation to Foreign Ministries: A Study of Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico (1946–2015).” Journal of Politics in Latin America 12 (2): 123–54.
Bjola, C., and I. Manor. 2018. “Revisiting Putnam’s Two-level Game Theory in the Digital Age: Domestic Digital Diplomacy and the Iran Nuclear Deal.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 31 (1): 3–32.
Brown, K., and C. Hensman. 2014. Data-driven Public Diplomacy: Progress Towards Measuring the Impact of Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting Activities. Washington, D.C.: United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.
Burr, R.N. 1974. By Reason or Force: Chile and the Balancing of Power in South America, 1830–1905. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Centurión, E.L., and F.A. Trinadori López. 2019. “Diplomacia digital: los cambios y las continuidades en el uso de Twitter de las administraciones de Cristina Fernández y Mauricio Macri (2011–2018).” Unpublished thesis. Buenos Aires: Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina.
Cooper, A. 2019. “The Disintermediation Dilemma and Its Impact on Diplomacy: A Research Agenda for Turbulent Times.” Diplomacy & Statecraft 30 (4): 799–807.
Cull, N.J. 2013. “The Long Road to Public Diplomacy 2.0: The Internet in U.S. Public Diplomacy.” International Studies Review 15 (1): 123–39.
———. 2018. “Prólogo.” In Diplomacia pública digital: el contexto iberoamericano, eds. D. Aguirre, M. Erlandsen, and M. López, 11–20. San José: Editorial Escuela de Relaciones Internacionales Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica.
Erlandsen, M., and M.F. Hernández. 2018. “Argentina en manos de@ cfkargentina. Diplomacia pública digital: el contexto iberoamericano.” In Diplomacia pública digital: el contexto iberoamericano, eds. D. Aguirre, M. Erlandsen, and M. López, 155–91. San José: Editorial Escuela de Relaciones Internacionales Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica.
Fajardo, M. 2022. The World that Latin America Created: The United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America in the Development Era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gobo, K., and C. Santos. 2022. “The Social Origin of Career Diplomats in Brazil’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Still an Upper-class Elite?” In Ministries of Foreign Affairs in the World, ed. C. Lequesne, 15–38. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
González, G., et al. 2021. “Coyuntura crítica, transición de poder y vaciamiento latinoamericano.” Nueva Sociedad 191: 49–65.
Hart, J. 2013. Empire of Ideas: The Origins of Public Diplomacy and the Transformation of U.S. Foreign Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hayden, C. 2011. “Beyond the ‘Obama Effect’: Refining the Instruments of Engagement through U.S. Public Diplomacy.” American Behavioral Scientist 55 (6): 784–802.
Heine, J. 2008. “On the Manner of Practising the New Diplomacy.” In Global Governance and Diplomacy, eds. A. Cooper, B. Hocking, and W. Malley, 271–87. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2013. “From Club to Network Diplomacy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, eds. A. Cooper, J. Heine, and R. Thakur. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, J., and J. Turcotte. 2012. “Tweeting as Statecraft: How, against All Odds, Twitter Is Changing the World’s Second Oldest Profession.” Crossroads 3 (2): 59–72.
Malacalza, B. 2021. “Sudamérica, una periferia convulsionada.” Nueva Sociedad 295: 29–41.
Manor, I. 2019. The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy. New York: Springer International.
Melissen, J., ed. 2005. The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mendelson Forman, J. 2016. “Foreign Policy in the Kitchen.” Global Policy, October 10. https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/10/10/2016/foreign-policy-kitchen.
Neyra, A., and R. Rubio. 2018. “Cancillería peruana: de la digitalización a la modernización.” Revista Mexicana de Política Exterior 113: 141–61.
Orrego, F., ed. 1975. América Latina, clase media de las naciones. Santiago: Institute of International Studies, University of Chile.
Pamment, J., and C. Bjola. 2018. Countering Online Propaganda and Violent Extremism: The Dark Side of Digital Diplomacy. Abingdon: Routledge.
Peron, V., and S. Perreira. 2018. “Medios sociales y la diplomacia pública digital brasileña: Un análisis sobre el uso de Twitter por ltamaraty durante el proceso de juicio político del Gobierno de Dilma Rousseff.” In Diplomacia pública digital: el contexto iberoamericano, eds. D. Aguirre, M. Erlandsen, and M. López, 195–241. San José: Editorial Escuela de Relaciones Internacionales Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica.
Pestana, A. 2020. “The Brazilian Approach to Public Diplomacy.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, 342–49. London: Routledge.
Putnam, R.D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games.” International Organization 42 (3): 427–60.
Riordan, S. 2020. “Covid-19 and the Digitalization of Diplomacy.” Journal of Diplomacy 24: 124–31.
Rockower, P.S. 2012. “Recipes for Gastrodiplomacy.” Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 8 (3): 235–46.
Rogers, E. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
Romero, L., A. Alfaro, E. Hudson, and D. Aguirre. 2021. “Digital Diplomacy and Covid-19: An Exploratory Approximation towards Interaction and Consular Assistance on Twitter.” Comunicación y Sociedad 18: 1.
Schindler, C.E. 2018. The Origins of Public Diplomacy in U.S. Statecraft. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stallings, B. 2009. “Chile: Pioneer in Trade Policy.” In Competitive Regionalism: FTA Diffusion in the Pacific Rim, eds. M. Solís, B. Stallings, and S. Katada, 118–38. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilson, R. 2013. “‘Cocina Peruana para el Mundo’: Gastrodiplomacy, the Culinary Nation Brand and the Context of National Culture in Peru.” Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy 2 (1): 1–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heine, J., Aguirre, D. (2023). Digitalizing South American MFAs: Reform and Resistance. In: Hare, P.W., Manfredi-Sánchez, J.L., Weisbrode, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Diplomatic Reform and Innovation. Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10971-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10971-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10970-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10971-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)