Abstract
Over recent years, there has been an explosion of digital technologies and infrastructure, and many biomedical education contexts have taken advantage of these new tools and platforms for teaching and learning visualisation practices. However, there are uncertainties, concerns, and debates in the literature, regarding the impact of digital technology on biomedical visualisation, and education more broadly. In this discussion paper, a multimodal social semiotics perspective is applied to examining visual representations, and the visual language we use to make meaning with these representations, in four different ways. Firstly, in terms of the function, role, and positionality of visual representations within the biomedical sciences. Secondly, within the context of a disciplinary Discourse, wherein visual language functions as just one of many socially specific languages, or modes, such as the written, verbal, and symbolic modes, and through which we animate the discourse and make disciplinary meaning. Thirdly, consideration is given to the meaning-making affordances and limitations of biomedical visualisation practices, affirming that no single mode or media is superior and that multimodal integration is a necessity. Finally, there is a discussion of the approaches to teaching and learning for the acquisition of a disciplinary Discourse, which highlights a need to focus on explicating the hidden curriculum. This discussion presents a perspective that offers some valuable insights into the uncertainties expressed in the literature and empowers educators with some productive pedagogical strategies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The phrase ‘visual representations’ is used to distinguish between visualisations as a noun (which refers to the visual representations that we see and interact with in the external world around), and visualisation as a verb (the process of constructing an internal or mental representation). The focus of this chapter is on the former.
- 2.
Affordances refer to the meaning-making possibilities or potentials of something, or put another way, the possibilities and potentials of ‘…what can be ‘said’ or ‘done’…’ with a thing (Kress and Van Leeuwen 2006, p. 123)
- 3.
These terms will be defined in subsequent sections.
- 4.
Discourse (distinguished by use of an uppercase ‘D’) which refers to a socio-cultural community is not to be confused with discourse (lowercase d), which refers to a connected length of language.
References
Airey J, Linder C (2009) A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. J Res Sci Teach 46(1):27–49
Bezemer J (2017) Visual research in clinical education. Med Educ 51(1):105–113
Border S (2019) Assessing the role of screencasting and video use in anatomy education. In: Biomedical visualisation. Springer, Cham, pp 1–13
Crow J, Murray JA (2020) Online distance learning in biomedical sciences: community, belonging and presence. In: Biomedical visualisation. Springer, Cham, pp 165–178
Cui D, Chen J, Meyer E, Yang G (2019) Anatomy visualizations using stereopsis: current methodologies in developing stereoscopic virtual models in anatomical education. In: Biomedical visualisation. Springer, Cham, pp 49–65
Erolin C (2019) Interactive 3D digital models for anatomy and medical education. In: Biomedical visualisation. Springer, Cham, pp 1–16
Finn GM, Matthan J (2019) Pedagogical perspectives on the use of technology within medical curricula: moving away from norm driven implementation. In: Biomedical visualisation. Springer, Cham, pp 55–65
Gee JP (1989) Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: introduction. J Educ 171(1):5–17
Goodwin C (1994) Professional vision. Am Anthropol 96(3):606–633
Hafferty FW (1998) Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine's hidden curriculum. Acad Med 73(4):403–407
Halliday MA (1993) Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguist Educ 5(2):93–116
Harrison C (2003) Visual social semiotics: understanding how still images make meaning. Tech Commun 50(1):46–60
Huser C, Marks L, Linn A, Meek S (2019) Student-created online teaching resources for students. In: Biomedical visualisation. Springer, Cham, pp 37–46
Jewitt C, Kress G, Ogborn J, Tsatsarelis C (2001) Exploring learning through visual, actional and linguistic communication: the multimodal environment of a science classroom. Educ Rev 53(1):5–18
Johnson EO, Charchanti AV, Troupis TG (2012) Modernization of an anatomy class: from conceptualization to implementation. A case for integrated multimodal–multidisciplinary teaching. Anat Sci Educ 5(6):354–366
Jones MG, Andre T, Superfine R, Taylor R (2003) Learning at the nanoscale: the impact of students' use of remote microscopy on concepts of viruses, scale, and microscopy. J Res Sci Teach 40(3):303–322
Kelly-Laubscher RF, Muna N, van der Merwe M (2017) Using the research article as a model for teaching laboratory report writing provides opportunities for development of genre awareness and adoption of new literacy practices. Engl Specif Purp 48:1–16
Kress GR, Van Leeuwen T (2006) Reading images: the grammar of visual design, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, England
Kress G, Charalampos T, Jewitt C, Ogborn J (2014) Multimodal teaching and learning: the rhetorics of the science classroom. Bloomsbury Publishing
Kress GR, Van Leeuwen T (2020) Reading images: the grammar of visual design, 3rd edn. Routledge, London, England
Latour B (1986) Visualization and cognition. Knowledge Society 6(6):1–40
Lea MR, Street BV (1998) Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Stud High Educ 23(2):157–172
Lemke J (2000) Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum. Linguist Educ 10(3):247–271
Lemke JL (2004) The literacies of science. In: Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice, pp 33–47
Matthan J, Finn GM (2020) The hidden curriculum of utilisation of imaging and unregulated digital resources within clinical education. In: Biomedical Visualisation. Springer, Cham, pp 145–163
McMenamin PG, Quayle MR, McHenry CR, Adams JW (2014) The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ 7(6):479–486
Meyer ER, Cui D (2020) Anatomy visualizations using stereopsis: assessment and implication of stereoscopic virtual models in anatomical education. In: Biomedical Visualisation. Springer, Cham, pp 117–130
Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A (2017) The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 10(6):549–559
Muna N, Paxton M, Frith V, van der Merwe M (2020) Unpacking the multimodal discourse demands of microscopy in a bioscience laboratory. Int J Sci Educ 42(16):2742–2764
Pea RD (2004) The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. J Learn Sci 13(3):423–451
Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, Weller R (2013) “Let's get physical”: advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 6(4):216–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1345
Reinke, N.B., Kynn, M. and Parkinson, A.L., 2021. Immersive 3D experience of osmosis improves learning outcomes of first-year cell biology students. CBE—life sciences education, 20(1), p.ar1
Rybarczyk B (2011) Visual literacy in biology: a comparison of visual representations in textbooks and journal articles. J College Sci Teach 41(1):106
Singh R, Yadav N, Pandey M, Jones DG (2022) Is inadequate anatomical knowledge on the part of physicians hazardous for successful clinical practice? Surg Radiol Anat 44:1–10
Stevens R, Hall R (1998) Disciplined perception: learning to see in technoscience. In: Talking mathematics in school: studies of teaching and learning, pp 107–149
Stromberga Z, Phelps C, Smith J, Moro C (2021) Teaching with disruptive technology: the use of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality (HoloLens) for disease education. Adv Exp Med Biol 1317:147–162
Watson FL, Lom B (2008) More than a picture: helping undergraduates learn to communicate through scientific images. CBE—Life Sci Educ 7(1):27–35
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Muna, N. (2022). A Multimodal Social Semiotics Perspective on Teaching and Learning Using Biomedical Visualisations. In: Shapiro, L., Rea, P.M. (eds) Biomedical Visualisation . Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1388. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10889-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10889-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10888-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10889-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)