Abstract
Construction contracts acquisition is highly competitive and the process involves taking risks. The scenario sometimes leads to situations whereby contractors deploy different ploys to recoup financial proceeds unduly particularly when the risks undertaken do not match up with the remuneration as expected. This study sets out to examine the mitigating measures to construction contractors’ opportunistic behaviours. Questionnaire survey was used in getting responses from construction professionals. Using appropriate methods of data analysis, data retrieved was analysed and the findings revealed the measures for mitigating contractors’ opportunism. The study concluded by stating that parties to a contract ought to be fully aware of what is expected of all stakeholders; it helps in defining their roles and responsibilities in the contractual undertaking. Finally, the study recommended that in as much as there can’t be an entirely complete contract, efforts should be made to ensure that issues like contract documentation should be well and appropriately done; roles and responsibilities of stakeholders should be well defined so as to fully keep abreast with all parties the expectations with their duties with respect to the project objectives. Equally, there should be equity and fairness in allocation of risks to the various stakeholders of construction contracts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anyanwu CI (2013) The role of building construction project team members in building projects delivery. IOSR J Bus Manag 14(1):30–34
Baker S, Krawiec KD (2006) Incomplete contracts in a complete contract world. Fla State Univ Law Rev 33:725–755
Brown JR, Dev CS, Lee DJ (2000) Managing marketing channel opportunism: the efficacy of alternative governance mechanisms. J Mark 64(2):51–65
Chang C, Chen S (2016) Transitional public-private partnership model in China: contracting with little recourse to contracts. J Constr Eng Manag 10:05016011
Fan L, Ho C, Ng V (2001) A study of quantity surveyors’ ethical behaviour. Constr Manag Econ 191:19–36
Hart O, Moore J (1999) Foundations of incomplete contracts. Rev Econ Stud 66(1):115–138
Judge WQ, Dooley R (2006) Strategic alliance outcomes: a transaction cost economics perspective. Br J Manag 17(1):23–37
Kashyap V, Murtha BR (2017) The joint effects of ex ante contractual completeness and ex post governance on compliance in franchised marketing channels. J Mark 81(3):130–153
Lai CS, Liu SS, Yang CF, Lin HW, Tsai HW (2005) Governance mechanisms of opportunisms of opportunism: integrating from transaction cost analysis and relational exchange theory. Taiwan Acad Manage J 5(1):1–24
Luo Y (2007) Are joint venture partners more opportunistic in a more volatile environment? Strateg Manag J 28(1):39–60
Mitropoulos P, Howell G (2001) Model for understanding, preventing, and resolving project disputes. J Constr Eng Manag 127(3):223–233
Ning Y (2017) Combining formal controls and trust to improve dwelling fit-out project performance: a configurational analysis. Int J Project Manage 35(7):1238–1252
Ogunsina O, Ogunsemi DR, Awodele O (2012) Governing construction project procurement to mitigate contractors’ opportunism: a conceptual framework. In: Proceedings of West Africa built environment (WABER) conference, July 24–26, Abuja-Nigeria, pp 1053–1065
Pang HY, Cheung SO, Choi MC, Chu SY (2015) Opportunism in construction contracting: minefield and manifestation. Int J Proj Org Manage 7(1):31–55
Scott R, Triantis G (2005) Incomplete contracts and the theory of contract design. Case W Res Law Rev 56(1):187–201
Shi C, Chen Y, You J, Yao H (2018) Asset specificity and contractors’ opportunistic behaviour: moderating roles of contract and trust. J Manag Eng 34(5):040180261–040180312
Williamson O (2005) Transaction cost economics and business administration. Scand J Manage 21(1):19–40
Wu A, Wang Z, Chen S (2017) Impact of specific investments, governance mechanisms and behaviors on the performance of cooperative innovation projects. Int J Project Manage 35(3):504–515
Yates DJ, Hardcastle C (2002) The causes of conflict and disputes in construction: a transaction cost economics perspectives. J Financ Manag Prop Constr 7(2):115–126
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ikuabe, M., Aigbavboa, C., Oke, A. (2023). Synthesizing Construction Professionals’ Perceived Measures of Mitigating Contractors’ Opportunism. In: Duffy, V.G., Lehto, M., Yih, Y., Proctor, R.W. (eds) Human-Automation Interaction. Automation, Collaboration, & E-Services, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10780-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10780-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10779-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10780-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)