Abstract
New technologies are being introduced to support the future of work in Financial Services (FS). This paper reports on human factors action research pertaining to the specification of a ‘proof of concept’ for a future ‘Intelligent Work’ (IW) system—predicated on advances in business process automation, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. It is argued that IW technologies should enable work that is smart, healthy, safe, and ethical. The implementation of IW technologies will be underpinned by positive change in relation to supporting wellbeing culture in financial services, and the integration of previously diverse processes and functions pertaining to business process management, customer services, human resources, occupational health and safety/health protection and health promotion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Elkington J (1999) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone, Oxford. ISBN 9780865713925. OCLC 963459936
Sengenberger W (2013) The international labour organization: goals, functions, and political impact. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Berlin
Simplicity. What is Knowledge Work? Available at https://simplicable.com/new/knowledge-work-definition
Russell R, Taylor B (2005) Operations management. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Schmidt K, Bannon L (1992) Taking CSCW seriously. Comput Supported Coop Work 1:7–40
Anagoste S (2018) Robotic Automation process—the operating system for the digital enterprise. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on business excellence, pp 54–69
van der Aalst WMP, La Rosa M, Santoro FM (2016) Business process management. Bus Inf Syst Eng 58:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0409-x
Eisner M (2020) What is digital process automation. https://www.processmaker.com/blog/what-is-digital-process-automation-dpa/
Stuart A (2021) Dynamic case management. https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/dynamic-case-management-DCM
Engel GL (1977) The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine (PDF). Science. 196(4286): 129–36
Nussbaum M, Sen A (1993) The Quality of Life. Clarendon Press, Oxford
The World Health Organisation (WHO) (2021) Measuring quality of life. https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2011) Better life index. Available at: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2011) Mental wellbeing in work. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/PH22
Cox T, Griffiths A (2005) The nature and measurement of work-related stress: theory and practice. In: Wilson JR, Corlett N (eds) Evaluation of human work, 3rd edn. Abingdon, Routledge, UK
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (1998) Stress at Work. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/99-101/pdfs/99-101.pdf?id=10.26616/NIOSHPUB99101
Mental Health First Aid (MHFA), England. Mental health statistics. Available at: https://mhfaengland.org/mhfa-centre/research-and-evaluation/mental-health-statistics/
International Labour Organisation (ILO) (2012) WHO & ILO joint statement on occupational health services & practices. Available at https://archive.ph/20120904021458/http://www.ilo.org/safework_bookshelf/english?content&nd=857170174
Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2021) Workplace health model. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/model/
The World Health Organisation (WHO) (2021) Healthy workplace model. Available at: https://www.who.int/occupational_health/healthy_workplace_framework.pdf
The World Health Organisation (WHO) (2021) Health promoting workplace. https://www.who.int/occupational_health/topics/workplace/en/
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (2021) Psychosocial risks. Availa https://osha.europa.eu/en/themes/psychosocial-risks-and-stress
International Standards Organisation (ISO). ISO/FDIS 45003 (2021) Occupational health and safety management—Psychological health and safety at work—guidelines for managing psychosocial risks. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/64283.html
International Standards Organisation (ISO). ISO/PAS 45005:2020 (2021) Occupational health and safety management—general guidelines for safe working during the COVID-19 pandemic. Available from https://www.iso.org/standard/64286.html
Goetzel RZ, Ozminkowski RJ (2008) The health and cost benefits of work site health-promotion programs. Annu Rev Public Health 29:303–323
Hymel PA, Loeppke RR, Baase CM, Burton WN, Hartenbaum NP, Hudson TW, McLellan RK, Mueller KL, Roberts MA, Yarborough CM, Konicki DL, Larson PW (2011) Workplace health protection and promotion. J Occup Environ Med 53(6):695–702. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e31822005d0
McGrath JE (1991) Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): a theory of groups. Small Group Res 22(2):147–174
Schaufeli WB (2013) What is engagement? In: Truss C, Alfes K, Delbridge R, Shantz A, Soane E (eds) Employee engagement in theory and practice. Routledge, London
MacLeod D, Clarke N (2014) The evidence: Wellbeing and employee engagement. Available at: http://engageforsuccess.org/the-evidence-wellbeing-and-engagement
Gallup (2013) The state of the global workplace: employee engagement insights for business leaders worldwide. Available at: https://engageforsuccess.org/the-state-of-the-global-workplace-employee-engagement-insights-for-business-leaders
Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organ Behav Hum Perform 16(2):250–279
Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row, New York
Csikszentmihalyi M (2004) Flow, the secret to happiness. [Video File] TED talks. Retrieved from: http://www.ted.com/talks/mihaly_csikszentmihalyi_on_flow
Mercer (2019) National survey of employer-sponsored health plans. Available at: http://imercer.com/products/employer-sponsored-health-plans
Society for Human Resource Management (2011) Promoting employee well-being: wellness strategies to improve health, performance, and the bottom line. Available at: https://www.shrm.org/foundation/ourwork/initiatives/the-aging-workforce/Documents/Promoting%20Employee%20Well-Being.pdf
International Standards Organisation (ISO) (2020) Standard 6385 Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/63785.html
Baxter G, Sommerville I (2011) Socio-technical systems: from design methods to systems engineering. Interact Comput 23(1):4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003
Veruggio G, Operto F, Siciliano B, Khatib O (eds) (2008) Roboethics: social and ethical implications of robotics. In: Springer handbook of robotics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 1499–1524
Capurro R (2009) Digital ethics. In: The Academy of Korean Studies (ed) Civilization and peace. Academy of Korean Studies 2010, Korea, pp 203–214
IEEE (2018) Ethically aligned design, a vision for prioritizing human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems. 1st edn (EAD1e) i. 2018. Available from: https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/
Cousins JB, Whitmore E, Shulha L (2013) Arguments for a common set of principles for collaborative inquiry in evaluation. Am J Eval 34:7–22
Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Cahill J (2020) Embedding ethics in human factors design and evaluation methodologies. In: Duffy V (ed) Digital human modeling and applications in health, safety, ergonomics and risk management. Human communication, organization and work. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12199. Springer, Cham, pp 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49907-5_15
Miake-Lye IM, Hempel S, Shanman R et al (2016) What is an evidence map ? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products. Syst Rev 5:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0204-x
Hammersley M, Atkinson P (2007) Ethnography: principles in practice, 3rd edn. Routledge, London, UK
Bødker S (1996) Creating conditions for participation: conflicts and resources in systems design. Hum Comput Interact 11(3):215–236. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1103_2
Carroll JM (1995) Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system develop-ment. Wiley, New York
Pruitt J, Grudin J (2003) Personas: practice and theory. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on designing for user experiences (DUX ‘03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/997078.997089
Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992) The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review (Jan–Feb 1992). Available at https://hbr.org/1992/01/the-balanced-scorecard-measures-that-drive-performance-2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendices
1.1 Personae and Scenarios
# | Role | Sub role | Personae | Scenario |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Operations manager | N/A | Michelle | Michelle reviews team productivity. Michelle forecasts workload for next week and reassigns team priorities and work items in line with SL schedule. Michelle discusses work plan with Shona and other team supervisors. This week, need to involve third party company—new team members |
2 | Team Supervisor | N/A | Shona | Shona assesses team workload for today. Shona onboards Jenny. Shona allocates work to the team—Bob, Jenny & Sam. Shona flags issues with Bob’s performance with Michelle & Paul |
3 | Team Members | Human role 1—established in team | Bob | Bob is working from home. Bob reviews job items for the day. Bob evaluates own performance. Bob starts work item and requests assistance |
Human role 2—new in team | Jenny | Jenny is working with teams in different time zones. Jenny requests reconsideration of her weekly workload, following review of team assignments. Jenny evaluates her own performance | ||
Human role 3—3rd Party | Sam | Sam is working for a third-party company in Poland. Sam is working on Shona’s assignments today | ||
Robot: Team Member/basic tasks | Zari | Zari prompts Shona that Bob’s work is not done and takes over on task (with Bob permission) | ||
Robot: Task assistant | Mike | Mike provides task support in relation to a mortgage application for Jenny | ||
4 | Customer | N/A | Clare | Customer submits enquiry information. Bob processes query. Zari completes query |
5 | HR Resource Manager | N/A | Paul | Onboarding Jenny. Wellbeing and Performance Check-in with Bob |
6 | Change Manager | N/A | Evelyn | Managing transition to Allocate (Gen 2) and My Work |
7 | CEO | N/A | Kirk | Kirk reviews business performance |
8 | Regulator | N/A | Silvia | Oversight on claims process—regulatory context |
1.2 Intelligent Work States (Team Member)
1: States to promote/support | 2: States to manage/mitigate/reduce | 3: States to avoid |
---|---|---|
Understands role and how links to business goals | Lack of understanding of role and how links to business goals | |
Understanding of work schedule and deadlines | Lack of understanding of work schedule and deadlines | |
Identity in work | Loss of identity. Objectification of worker | |
Professionalism | Challenges to professionalism | Lack of professionalism |
Autonomy in work | Loss of autonomy | |
Feel in control of work and the workday (autonomy and flexibility over the timing, location, pace, and order of work) | Loss of control | |
Confidence in ability to self-manage work and workload | ||
Flow and attention | Distraction | Lost or confused |
Wellness in work Psychological wellbeing in work | Working overtime/long hours Working in continually high stress situations Work related stress (WRS) Anxiety in work Pressure Poor mental health in work | Worsening of health in work Work contributing to health problems Poor mental health Presenteeism Absenteeism |
Self-management of health in work Self-efficacy | Post-neurotic subject at work | |
Flow and attention | Distraction | Lost or confused |
Wellness in work Psychological wellbeing in work | ||
Fit for work (fatigue levels) | Fatigue Working overtime/long hours | Exhaustion & Burnout |
Work/life balance and management of home/work interface | No work/life balance Work negative impact on home life Work/home conflict | |
Effective performance | Performance errors | Performance Errors |
Safe performance | Unsafe behaviour Near misses (safety events) Minor safety events | Safety events Incidents and accident in work |
Work satisfaction | Work dissatisfaction | Attrition |
Motivation Engagement in work Positive attitude to work Wake up—want to go to work! | Lack of engagement with work Demotivated | Active non engagement with work Toxic employee |
Delivering quality work | Mistakes and/or poor-quality work | |
Valued member of team | Not accepted in team Not wanted in team Team members avoid | |
Teamwork | Poor teamwork | Team disputes and unhealthy teamwork |
Good communication with team supervisor about status of work/workload | Not putting hand up if problem | |
Sense of purpose and meaning in work Sense of value | Lack of purpose/meaning/value | Loss of purpose/meaning/value |
Sense of belonging | Not feeling in a team Social isolation | Not feeling in a team Social isolation |
Dignity | Objectification of worker/Commodity | |
In control | Post-neurotic subject at work—monitored and objectified by employer | |
Nurtured/supported—role, career path and progression | No support for progression | |
Growth and continuous learning Self-realization in work | No progress Inertia | |
Feeling listened to | Not listened too | |
Good customer service | Poor customer service | |
Trust | Cynicism, lack of trust and/or loss of trust | Loss of trust |
Acceptance of work technologies | ||
Understanding of who has access to performance information and how used | ||
Understanding of who has access to health information and how used | ||
Consent to work performance information to be tracked | ||
Consent to health information to be tracked while in work | ||
Peace of mind/job security | Job instability and insecurity Anxiety |
1.3 Intelligent Work States (Team Supervisor)
1: States to promote/support | 2: States to manage/mitigate/reduce | 3: States to avoid |
---|---|---|
Understands role and how links to business goals | Poor understanding of role | Lack of understanding of role and how links to business goals |
Understanding of work schedule and deadlines | Poor understanding of work schedule and deadlines | Lack of understanding of work schedule and deadlines |
Understanding of work priorities | Poor understanding of work priorities | Lack of understanding of work priorities |
Understanding of forecasted assignments and workload for team/team members | Poor understanding of forecasted assignments and workload for team/team members | Lack of understanding of forecasted assignments and workload for team/team members |
Understanding of status of current work- on track/not on track to meet deadlines | Poor understanding of status of current work- on track/not on track to meet deadlines | Lack of understanding of status of current work- on track/not on track to meet deadlines |
Understanding of status of team members—workload, wellbeing, fatigue, MH in work | Poor understanding of status of team members—workload, wellbeing, fatigue, MH in work | Lack of understanding of status of team members—workload, wellbeing, fatigue, MH in work |
Understanding of team members competency, skills, expertise | Poor understanding of team members competency, skills, expertise | Lack of understanding of team members competency, skills, expertise |
Understanding of balance of work for team members—workload, interesting tasks, mundane tasks etc | Poor understanding balance of work for team members—workload, interesting tasks, mundane tasks etc | Lack of understanding of balance of work for team members—workload, interesting tasks, mundane tasks etc |
Listening to team members—if problems, if need help | Poor or weak listening to team members—if problems, if need help | Lack of listening to team members—if problems, if need help |
Responding to team members—if problems, if need help | Poor response to team members—if problems, if need help | Lack of response to team members—if problems, if need help |
1.4 High level Functions and Wellbeing/Workplace Health
1: Maintaining wellbeing | 2: Preventing WRS/wellbeing problems | 3: Managing worker problems/challenges |
---|---|---|
Provide task support information | Nudge managers—if somebody overworked- contribute to stress | Reporting/analytics on problems at team/individual level |
Smart allocation-right work, competency, right level of diversity/complexity | Smart allocation—deal with peaks and troughs | Integration of reporting with smart allocation |
Nudge team members to get help—having work related or personal issues | ||
Nudge breaks | ||
Nudge on social interaction |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cahill, J., Howard, V., Huang, Y., Ye, J., Ralph, S., Dillon, A. (2023). Future of Work and Work Systems: Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence for Designing Smart, Safe, Healthy and Ethical Work in Financial Services. In: Duffy, V.G., Lehto, M., Yih, Y., Proctor, R.W. (eds) Human-Automation Interaction. Automation, Collaboration, & E-Services, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10780-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10780-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10779-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10780-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)