Skip to main content

Warranted Eastern Christian Belief: Extending Plantinga’s Extended AC Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Eastern Christian Approaches to Philosophy

Abstract

Tyler Dalton McNabb and Michael DeVito develop a thoroughly original and Orthodox model for how Christian belief, and, even specifically Eastern Christian belief, can be warranted. They do this by creatively bringing recent work on religious experience, in the context of the Divine Liturgy, into conversation with Alvin Plantinga’s well-known explication of Reformed Epistemology. What emerges is a distinctly Eastern Christian approach to warranted Christian belief, that modifies and, arguably, improves upon Plantinga’s original model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Erik Baldwin and Tyler Dalton McNabb (2018) challenge this assumption.

  2. 2.

    For a more recent De Jure objection, see Stephen Law (2018). For a response, see chapter three of Tyler Dalton McNabb (2018).

  3. 3.

    For more on Kant and Plantinga’s epistemology, see Tyler Dalton McNabb and Erik Baldwin (2017).

  4. 4.

    See Zagzebski (1993), McNabb and Baldwin (2021)

  5. 5.

    See On the Orthodox Faith 3 (1.3) ed. P. Bonifatius Kotter, Die Schriften des Johannes von Damaskos, 8 vol (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1969–1988), 2:10–11, trans. S.D.F. Salmond, NPNF 2/9:2; Fragmenta philosophica (e cod. Oxon. Bodl. Auct. T. 1.6) 18.72–73 Greek text Die Schriften des Johannes Damaskos, 1:172 Alexey Fokin translation.

  6. 6.

    See Chapter 3 in Alfeyey for an in-depth analysis of each liturgical element.

  7. 7.

    Examples like this are discussed in Hasan and Fumerton (2019).

  8. 8.

    This is roughly what Dumsday (ibid., p. 170) has in mind.

  9. 9.

    Roughly, internalism is the thesis that in order for S’s belief to possess positive epistemic status, S must have access to those properties which confer the positive epistemic status.

  10. 10.

    For more on this, see chapters two and three of McNabb (2018)

References

  • Alfeyev, M. H. (2016). Orthodox Christianity: The worship and liturgical life of the orthodox Church (Vol. IV). St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, E., & McNabb, T. D. (2018). Plantingian religious epistemology and world religions. Lexington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilby, J. (2006). Epistemology as theology: An evaluation of Alvin Plantinga’s religious epistemology. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, K. Proper functionalism. The internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/prop-fun/

  • Bradshaw, D. (2015). The divine liturgy as mystical experience. European Journal For Philosophy of Religion, 7(2), 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvin, J. (1536, 1960). Institutes of the Christian religion (F. L. Battles, Trans. and J. T. McNeill, Ed.). Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrestou, P. (ed.). (1962–1965). First letter to Akindynos. In Gregoriou tou Palama: Syngrammata. Thessalonica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, O. (2000). On human being: A spiritual anthropology (J. Hummerstone, Trans.). New City Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 5:14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constas, N. (trans.). (2014). Maximus the Confessor. Ambigua 10.103.1–7. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuneo, T. (2016). Ritualized faith. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumsday, T. (2021). Experiential objections against natural theology in some recent orthodox thinkers. In D. Bradshaw & R. Swinburne (Eds.), Natural theology in the eastern orthodox tradition. Iota Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, H. T. (2012). A journey to the east: Coming to right worship and right belief. In R. Vitz (Ed.), Turning east: Contemporary philosophers and the ancient Christian faith. St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, A., & Fumerton, R. (2019). Knowledge by acquaintance and description. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-acquaindescrip/

  • Jacobs, N. (2018). Kant and the problem of divine revelation. In C. Firestone, N. Jacobs, & J. Joiner (Eds.), Kant and the question of theology (pp. 159–180). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, M. (2012). Canon revisited: Establishing the origins and authority of the new testament books. Crossway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, S. (2018). The X-Claim argument against religious belief. Religious Studies, 54, 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNabb, T. D. (2018). Religious epistemology. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNabb, T. D., & Baldwin, E. (2017). Divine methodology: A lawful response to Kantian and Kantian-esque defeaters. Open Theology, 3, 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNabb, T. D., & Baldwin, E. (2021). Religious epistemology in analytic theology. In J. Arcadi & J. Turner Jr. (Eds.), T&T Clark companion to analytic theology (pp. 35–44). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNabb, T. D., & Baldwin, E. (2022). Classical theism and Buddhism. Bloomsbury Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nemesius of Emesa. (2008). De natura hominis 43.132.13–21 (R.W. Sharples and P. J. van der Eijk, Trans.), Nemesius of Emesa: On the nature of man. Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and proper function. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. (ed.). (2007). Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 5.14. In The Ante Nicene Fathers Vl 2. Cosimo Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rota, M. (2016). Taking Pascal’s Wager: Evidence and the abundant life. Intervarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1910–1911). Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11, 108–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1912). The problems of philosophy. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, R. W., van der Eijk, Philip. J. (trans.). (2008). De natura Hominis 43.132.13–21. In Nemesius of Emesa: On the Nature of Man. Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, R. (2014). The existence of god. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, T. (1997). The Orthodox Church. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, N. (2015). The god we worship: An exploration of liturgical theology. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, L. (1993). Rational faith: Catholic responses to reformed epistemology. University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McNabb, T.D., DeVito, M. (2022). Warranted Eastern Christian Belief: Extending Plantinga’s Extended AC Model. In: Siemens, J., Brown, J.M. (eds) Eastern Christian Approaches to Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10762-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics