Skip to main content

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the ECOWAS–EU Interregional Partnership on Peace and Security in the Context of the Mali Crisis

  • 112 Accesses

Abstract

This study attempts to provide an analysis of interregional security cooperation between Western Africa and the EU as an external actor. Drawing on an internal and external conceptualisation of effectiveness, it focuses specifically on the joint efforts by the EU and ECOWAS in Mali. The analysis shows that factors such as resource exchange, coherence as well as coordination processes might constitute conducive conditions for effective interregional interaction. In addition, potentially constraining factors such as the (insufficient) capacities of the partners, an ill-developed resource exchange between them, and paucity of coordination both among external actors and regional partners hampered the effectiveness of ECOWAS-EU cooperation in Mali.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-10702-3_7
  • Chapter length: 34 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-031-10702-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 7.1

(Source own compilation)

Fig. 7.2

(Source own compilation)

Fig. 7.3

(Source own compilation based on the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project [ACLED])

Notes

  1. 1.

    The AU recognises eight RECs in Africa representing different (sub)regions: the Arab Maghreb Union (AMU), the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), the Community of Sahel–Saharan States (CEN–SAD), the East African Community (EAC), the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS), the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC).

  2. 2.

    Pan-Africanism has been described as “an ideology that is difficult to define because of its amorphous character, but which involves at least an aspiration to realize or recapture the dignity, freedom, autonomy and (or unity of Africans and/or of people of African descent” (Walraven, 1999: xvii).

  3. 3.

    There are also other organisations focusing on issues of peace and security. For instance, the Multi-National Joint Task Force (MNJTF) under the umbrella of the Lake Chad Basin Commission (LCBC). The MNJTF has been formed in particular to fight the uprising of Boko Haram in the Lake Chad region and constitutes another security actor in West Africa. With reference to the age of the organisation, the relations between the MNJTF and the EU are rather weakly developed so far.

  4. 4.

    For instance, the study of Aggarwal and Kwei on Asia–Pacific economic cooperation (2006) or the study of Ferabolli who focuses on the Arab-South American relations (2016).

References

  • Acharya, A. (2014). Global international relations (IR) and regional worlds: A new agenda for international studies. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 647–659.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A., & Johnston, A. I. (Eds.). (2007). Crafting cooperation: Regional international institutions in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, V. K., & Kwei, E. (2006). Asia-Pacific economic cooperation (APEC): Transregionalism with a new cause? In H. Hänggi, R. Roloff, & J. Rüland (Eds.), Interregionalism and international relations (pp. 67–84). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajala, A. (1973). Pan-Africanism: Evolution, progress and prospects. A. Deutsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, F., Scaramagli, T., & Söderbaum, F. (Eds.). (2014). Intersecting interregionalism: Regions, global governance and the EU. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagoyoko, N., & Gibert, M. V. (2009). The linkage between security, governance and development: The European Union in Africa. Journal of Development Studies, 45(5), 789–814.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bergamaschi, I. (2013). French military intervention in Mali: Inevitable, consensual yet insufficient. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, 2(2), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, J., & Niemann, A. (2015). Mediating international conflicts: The European Union as an effective peacemaker? Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(5), 957–975.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, R. (2011). Inter-organizational relations: An emerging research program. In B. Reinalda (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to non-state actors (pp. 173–184). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, R., & Koops, J. (2017). Studying relations among international organizations in wold politics: Core concepts and challenges. In J. Koops & R. Biermann (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics (pp. 1–46). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeke, S., & Schuurman, B. (2015). Operation ‘serval’: A strategic analysis of the French intervention in Mali, 2013–2014. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(6), 801–825.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (Eds.). (2016). The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosig, M. (2011). The emerging peace and security regime in Africa: The role of the EU. European Foreign Affairs Review, 16(1), 107–122.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Camroux, D. (2011). Interregionalism, a critique: The four levels of EU-ASEAN relations. In A. Warleigh, N. Robinson, & B. Rosamond (Eds.), New regionalism and the European Union: Dialogues, comparisons and new research directions (pp. 201–217). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, M. (2013a). EU-Africa relations in the twenty-first century: Evolution and explanations. In M. Carbone (Ed.), The European Union in Africa: Incoherent policies, asymmetrical partnership, declining relevance? (pp. 3–23). Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, M. (Ed.). (2013b). The European Union in Africa: Incoherent policies, asymmetrical partnership, declining relevance? Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccorulli, M., & Fanta, E. (2013). The EU and multilateral governance of migration in North and West Africa. In S. Lucarelli, L. van Langenhove, & J. Wouters (Eds.), The EU and multilateral security governance (pp. 165–183). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. (2015). Reform or business as usual? EU security provision in complex contexts: Mali. Global Society, 29(5), 260–279.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, P. F. (1994). International peacekeeping: With a new epilogue on Somalia, Bosnia, and Cambodia. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, M. (2007). Joined at the hip: Regionalism and interregionalism. Journal of European Integration, 29(2), 229–248.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, M. (2009). European Union interregionalism and the capability-expectations gap. Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies, 7(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, M. (2011). The European Union and interregionalism: Patterns of engagement. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, M. (2014). Interregionalism and the European Union: Conceptualising group-to-group relations. In F. Baert, T. Scaramagli, & F. Söderbaum (Eds.), Intersecting interregionalism: Regions, global governance and the EU (pp. 37–54). Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ECOWAS. (2012). Emergency mini-summit of ECOWAS heads of state and government on the situation in Mali. http://documentation.ecowas.int/download/en/reports/communiques/emergency_mini-summit_of_ecowas_heads_of_state_and_government/comfinal_mali_2012.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • European Commission. (2014). European Union—West Africa regional indicative programme 2014—2020. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/eeas-2015-rip-west-africa_en.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • European Union. (2005). EU strategy for Africa. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52005DC0489&from=EN. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • European Union (EU), and African Union (AU). (2007a). Joint Africa EU strategy: First joint action plan (2008–2010). http://www.africa-eu-partnership.org/sites/default/files/documents/jaes_action_plan_2008-2010.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • European Union (EU), and African Union (AU). (2007b). The Africa-EU strategic partnership. http://www.africa-eu-partnership.org/sites/default/files/documents/eas2007b_joint_strategy_en.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • Farrell, M. (2009). EU policy towards other regions: Policy learning in the external promotion of regional integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1165–1184.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. (2010). From Lomé to economic partnership agreements in Africa. In F. Söderbaum & P. Stålgren (Eds.), The European Union and the Global South (pp. 65–88). Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawn, R. (2009). Regions’ and their study: Wherefrom, what for and whereto? Review of International Studies, 35(S1), 5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ferabolli, S. (2016). Regions that matter: The Arab-South American interregional space. Third World Quarterly, 38(8), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioramonti, L., & Kotsopoulos, J. (2015). EU-Africa interregional relations and the role of South Africa. In M. Telò, L. L’Estrange Fawcett, & F. Ponjaert (Eds.), Interregionalism and the European Union: A post-revisionist approach to Europe’s place in a changing world (pp. 325–336). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioramonti, L., & Nshimbi, C. (2016). Regional migration governance in the African continent: Current state of affairs and the way forward. Stiftung Entwicklung und Frieden. http://www.sef-bonn.org/fileadmin/Die_SEF/Publikationen/SB/sb_studie-2016_en.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • Francis, D. J. (2009). Peacekeeping in a bad neighbourhood: The economic community of West African states (ECOWAS) in peace and security in West Africa. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 9(3), 87–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. J. (2013). The regional impact of the armed conflict and French intervention in Mali (NOREF Report). Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/163177/f18726c3338e39049bd4d554d4a22c36.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • Furness, M., & Gänzle, S. (2017). The security-development nexus in European Union foreign relations after Lisbon: Policy coherence at last? Development Policy Review, 35(4), 475–492.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Furness, M., & Olsen, G. R. (2016). Europeanisation and the EU’s comprehensive approach to crisis management in Africa. European Politics and Society, 17(1), 105–119.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haastrup, T. (2009). A security actor in a changing world? The EU in Africa. In F. Laursen (Ed.), The EU as a foreign and security policy actor (pp. 281–298). Republic of Letters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haastrup, T. (2013a). Africa-EU partnership on peace and security. In J. Mangala (Ed.), Africa and the European Union a strategic partnership (pp. 47–68). Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haastrup, T. (2013b). Charting transformation through security: contemporary EU-Africa relations. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haastrup, T. (2013c). EU as mentor? Promoting regionalism as external relations practice in EU–Africa relations. Journal of European Integration, 35(7), 785–800.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hänggi, H. (2006). Interregionalism as a multifaceted phenomenon: In search of a typology. In H. Hänggi, R. Roloff, & J. Rüland (Eds.), Interregionalism and international relations (pp. 31–62). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hänggi, H., Roloff, R., & Rüland, J. (Eds.). (2006). Interregionalism and international relations. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henneberg, I., & Plank, F. (2020). Overlapping regionalism and security cooperation: Power-based explanations of Nigeria’s forum-shopping in the fight against Boko Haram. International Studies Review, 22(3), 576–599.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (2005). A world of regions: Asia and Europe in the American imperium: Cornell studies in political economy. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingah, S. (2006). The revised cotonou agreement between the European Community and the African, Caribbean and Pacific States: Innovations on security, political dialogue, transparency, money and social responsibility, Journal of African Law, 50(1), 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koops, J. (2017). Inter-organizationalism in international relations: A multilevel framework for analysis. In R. Biermann & J. Koops (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics (pp. 189–216). Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lavallée, C., & Völkel, J. C. (2015). Military in Mali: The EU’s action against instability in the Sahel region. European Foreign Affairs Review, 20(2), 159–185.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Lucia, E. (2012). A tool for security governance: How is the EU fostering and shaping ECOWAS security and defence regionalization process? (17. GR:EEN Working Paper). http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/green/papers/workingpapers/no.17_lopez_lucia.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • Maiangwa, B. (2017). Assessing the responses of the economic community of West African states to the recurring and emerging security threats in West Africa. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 52(1), 103–120.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mangala, J. (2013a). Africa and the European Union A strategic partnership. Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mangala, J. (2013b). Africa-EU strategic partnership: Historical background, institutional architecture, and theoretical frameworks. In J. Mangala (Ed.), Africa and the European Union a strategic partnership (pp. 15–45). Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marchi, L. (2016). The EU’s role in developing security cooperation with Myanmar at the ASEAN regional forum: 2004–2008. European Security, 25(2), 197–215.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Motsamai, D., & Brosig, M. (2014). Modeling cooperative peacekeeping: Exchange theory and the African peace and security regime. Journal of International Peacekeeping, 18(1–2), 45–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntschick, J. (2018). The Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the European Union (EU): Regionalism and external influence. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nivet, B. (2006). Security by proxy? The EU and (sub- )regional organisations : The case of ECOWAS. European Union Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberthür, S., & Groen, L. (2015). The effectiveness dimension of the EU’s performance in international institutions: Toward a more comprehensive assessment framework. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(6), 1319–1335.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Okemuo, G. (2013). The EU or France? The CSDP mission in Mali the consistency of the EU Africa policy. Liverpool Law Review, 34(3), 217–240.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, G. R. (2006). The post September 2001 security agenda: Have the European Union’s policies towards Africa been affected? In G. Bono (Ed.), The impact of 9/11 on European foreign and security policy (pp. 153–176). Brussels University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, G. R. (2014). Fighting terrorism in Africa by proxy: The USA and the European Union in Somalia and Mali. European Security, 23(3), 290–306.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peen Rodt, A. (2014). The European Union and military conflict management: Defining, evaluating and achieving success. Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Piccolino, G., & Minou, S. (2014). The EU and regional integration in West Africa: What effects on conflict resolution and transformation? (Regionconf Working Paper Series 5). http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&g=0&t=1421492121&hash=d37e60959a972b1569ba15bbc5803851e0973fe1&file=fileadmin/Uni_Tuebingen/Fakultaeten/SozialVerhalten/Institut_fuer_Politikwissenschaft/Dokumente/diez/Projekte_Diez_RegioConf/Pretoria_Feb14_final.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • Plank, F. (2017). The effectiveness of interregional security cooperation: Evaluating the joint engagement of the EU and the AU in response to the 2013 crisis in the Central African Republic. European Security, 26(4), 485–506.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Plank, F., & Niemann, A. (2017). Impact of the agent’s environment on discretion in the field of EU conflict resolution. In T. Delreux & J. Adriaensen (Eds.), The prinicipal-agent model and the European Union (pp. 131–156). Palgrave.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Raineri, L., & Rossi, A. (2017). The security-migration-development nexus in the Sahel: A reality check (IAI Working Papers 17). Istituto Affari Internazionali. http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaiwp1726.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • Rein, C. (2015). Enhancing peace and security in Africa through institutional cooperation. Contemporary Security Policy, 36(2), 267–295.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reuters. (2013). Mali Islamists suffer split as Africans prepare assault. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mali-rebels/mali-islamists-suffer-split-as-africans-prepare-assault-idUSBRE90M16T20130124. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • Ribeiro Hoffmann, A. (2016). Inter- and transregionalism. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 600–618). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robles, A. C. (2008). The Asia-Europe meeting (ASEM): The theory and practice of interregionalism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodt, A. P., & Okeke, J. M. (2013). AU-EU ‘strategic partnership’: Strengthening policy convergence and regime efficacy in the African peace and security complex? African Security, 6(3–4), 211–233.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roloff, R. (2006). Interregionalism in theoretical perspective: State of the art. In H. Hänggi, R. Roloff, & J. Rüland (Eds.), Interregionalism and international relations (pp. 17–30). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüland, J. (2002, July 5–6). Inter- and transregionalism: Remarks on the state of the art of a new research agenda. Paper presented at the Workshop on Asia-Pacific Studies in Australia and Europe: A Research Agenda for the Future. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/41664/3/ruland2.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • Rüland, J. (2010). Balancers, multilateral utilities or regional identity builders? International relations and the study of interregionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(8), 1271–1283.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rüland, J., Schubert, G., Schucher, G., & Storz, C. (Eds.). (2008). Asian-European relations: Building blocks for global governance? Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu, M. (2015). Countering terrorism: Challenges and opportunities in ASEAN-EU cooperation. In M. Telò, L. L’Estrange Fawcett, & F. Ponjaert (Eds.), Interregionalism and the European Union: A post-revisionist approach to Europe’s place in a changing world (pp. 87–108). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeppström, E., Hull Wiklund, C., & Jonsson, M. (2015). European Union training missions: Security sector reform or counter-insurgency by proxy? European Security, 24(2), 353–367.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F. (2016). Rethinking regionalism. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F., & Stålgren, P. (2010). The limits to interregional development cooperation in Africa. In F. Söderbaum & P. Stålgren (Eds.), The European Union and the Global South (pp. 141–158). Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F., Stålgren, P., & Van Langenhove, L. (2005). The EU as a global actor and the dynamics of interregionalism: A comparative analysis. Journal of European Integration, 27(3), 365–380.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Staeger, U. (2016). Africa-EU relations and normative power Europe: A decolonial pan-African critique: Africa-EU relations and NPE. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(4), 981–998.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Telò, M. (2015). Three reasons for reasserting the autonomy of a regionalist and interregionalist research agenda. In M. Telò, L. Fawcett, & F. Ponjaert (Eds.), Interregionalism and the European Union: A post-revisionist approach to Europe’s place in a changing world (pp. 67–83). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telò, M., Fawcett, L., & Ponjaert, F. (Eds.). (2015). Interregionalism and the European Union: A post-revisionist approach to Europe’s place in a changing world. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • ThisDay. (2013, January 17). Nigeria: Air force sends war planes to Mali Thursday. https://allafrica.com/stories/201301170615.html

  • Thompson, V. B. (1969). Africa and unity: The evolution of Pan-Africanism. Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2012). Security council resolution 2086 10 January 2013. http://www.un.org/press/en/2012/sc10870.doc.htm. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • Van Langenhove, L., Abass, A., & Baert, F. (2012). The EU as a global-regional actor in security and peace (The EU-GRASP Final Integrative Report). UNU-CRIS. http://i.unu.edu/media/unu.edu/publication/27154/Final-Integrative-Report3.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2021.

  • Walraven, K. V. (1999). Dreams of power: The role of the organization of African unity in the politics of Africa, 1963–1993. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. D. (2014). Reflections on the evolving African peace and security architecture. African Security, 7(3), 147–162.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (1994). International governance: Protecting the environment in a stateless society. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Interviews (Interview Number; Function Interviewee; Location and Date)

  • Interview A—EU member state representative6, Brussels, 12 October 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview B—EU member state representative, Brussels, 12 October 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview C—EU official, Brussels, 13 October 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview D—EU official, Brussels, 13 October 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview E—EU member state representative, Brussels, 14 October 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview F—EU official, Brussels, 14 October 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview H—EU official, Telephone, 27 November 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview I—EU member state representative, Cologne, 19 January 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview J—African member state representative, Nairobi, 22 February 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview K—African member state representative, Addis Ababa, 27 February 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview L—AU partner representative, Addis Ababa, 28 February 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview M—EU member state representative, Addis Ababa, 2 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview N—EU official, Addis Ababa, 7 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview O—EU official, Addis Ababa, 7 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview P—EU official, Addis Ababa, 8 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview Q—UN official, Addis Ababa, 8 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview R—AU official, Addis Ababa, 9 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview S—EU member state representative, Addis Ababa, 10 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview T—African member state representative, Abuja, 24 May 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview U—EU official, Abuja, 25 May 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview V—ECOWAS partner representative, Abuja, 26 May 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview W—Independent expert, Abuja, 30 May 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview X—EU official, Abuja, 1 June 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview Y—ECOWAS official, Abuja, 2 June 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview Z—ECOWAS official, Telephone, 24 June 2017.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich Plank .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Plank, F. (2022). Evaluating the Effectiveness of the ECOWAS–EU Interregional Partnership on Peace and Security in the Context of the Mali Crisis. In: Muntschick, J. (eds) Regionalism in Africa and External Partners. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10702-3_7

Download citation