Skip to main content

External Actors and Security Regionalism in Africa: A New Dataset on External Funding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter puts a focus on external donor funding as example of asymmetric relations between Europe and Africa. To contribute to a more nuanced debate about the role of external actors in the promotion of regionalism, both authors go beyond the EU as self-proclaimed key supporter of global regionalism and draw attention to a variety of external actors, which influence and shape African regional organisations from the outside. This includes unravelling and problematizing the motivations, roles, and effects of external actors in regionalism. Particular attention is paid to external donor support in the issue area of security in terms of ‘security-related funding’. This comprehensive mapping study is rich in empirical details because the authors develop and present a novel dataset about the external funding of regionalism in Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The eight official RECs are: Arab Maghreb Union (AMU), Community of Sahel-Saharan States (CEN-SAD), Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), East African Community (EAC), Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), Communauté Économique des États de l'Afrique Centrale (ECCAS), Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) and Southern African Development Community (SADC).

  2. 2.

    The remaining eight multi-purpose RIOs (which lack the status as RECs) are: Conseil de l'Entente (CE), Communauté Économique et Monétaire de l'Afrique Centrale (CEMAC), Economic Community of the Great Lakes Countries (CEPGL), International Conference on the Great Lakes Region (ICGLR), Indian Ocean Commission (IOC), Mano River Union (MRU), Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and West African Economic and Monetary Union (UEAMO).

  3. 3.

    The three continental programmes driven by the AU are categorised under the continental body: the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA), the African Governance Architecture (AGA) and the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD).

  4. 4.

    Activities should not be confused with (multi-year) aid programmes. A reported activity in the OECD database does not differentiate between the duration of a given aid intervention, and can therefore be understood as project-years. Multi-year activities/projects are reported for every year there are disbursements. Whereas some donor interventions are only one year long, many last for three to five years.

  5. 5.

    The 41 donors are: African Development Bank (AfDB), African Development Fund (AfDF), Australia, Austria, Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa (BADEA), Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, EU, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, International Development Association (IDA), Italy, Japan, Korea, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nordic Development Fund, Norway, Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries Fund for International Development (OFID), Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom and United States.

  6. 6.

    The 23 donors providing security-related funding to RIO are: the African Development Bank, African Development Fund, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, the EU, Finland, France, Germany, the International Development Association, the International Labour Organisation, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the US.

References

  • Baert, F., Scaramagli, T., & Söderbaum, F. (2014). Intersecting interregionalism: Regions, global governance and the EU. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A., & Hüllen, V. (2015). Towards a global script? Governance transfer by regional organizations. In T. A. Börzel & V. van Hüllen (Eds.), Governance transfer by regional organizations: Patching together a global script (pp. 3–21). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buzdugan, S. R. (2013). Regionalism from without: External involvement of the EU in regionalism in southern Africa. Review of International Political Economy, 20(4), 917–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, B. N. (2019). Sovereignty in the South: Intrusive regionalism in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, N., & Husted, T. F. (2016). The African Union (AU): Key issues and U.S.-AU relations. Congressional Research Service R44713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T., & Tocci, N. (2017). The EU, promoting regional integration, and conflict resolution. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, A., Fuchs, A., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2013). New Donors. International Interactions, 39(3), 402–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, U., & Mattheis, F. (2020) (Eds.). The finances of regional organisations in the Global South: Follow the money. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, U., Zinecker, H., Mattheis, F., Dietze, A., & Plötze, T. (2017). New politics of regionalism: Perspectives from Africa. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goltermann, L., Lohaus, M., Spielau, A,. & Striebinger, K. (2012). Roads to regionalism: Concepts, issues, and cases. In T. A. Börzel, L. Goltermann, M. Lohaus, & K. Striebinger (Eds.), Roads to regionalism. Genesis, design and effects of regional organizations (pp. 3–21). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (2013). The company states keep: International economic organizations and investor perceptions. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, B., Inotai, A., & Sunkel, O. (1999). Globalism and the new regionalism. Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (2005). A world of regions: Asia and Europe in the American imperium. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapohl, S. (Ed.). (2017). Regional integration in the South: External influence on economic cooperation in ASEAN, MERCOSUR and SADC. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, F. (2003). Comparative regional integration: Theoretical perspectives. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, T., Bezuijen, J., Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2015). Patterns of international organization: Task specific vs. general purpose. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft, 49, 131–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, N. (2004). The United States and regionalism in Central Asia. International Affairs, 80(3), 447–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, S. N., & Weiss, T. G. (1992). Regional organizations and regional security. Security Studies, 2(1), 6–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molineu, H. (1986). U.S. policy toward Latin America: From regionalism to globalism. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntschick, J. (2018). The Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the European Union (EU). Regionalism and external influence. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (1971). Peace in parts: Integration and conflict in regional organization. Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panke, D., & Stapel, S. (2018). Overlapping regionalism in Europe: Patterns and effects. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20(1), 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F. (2016). Rethinking regionalism. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F., & Brolin, T. (2016). Supporting regional cooperation and integration in Africa—What works and why? Expert Group for Aid Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F., & Shaw, T. M. (2003). Theories of new regionalism. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F., & Stålgren, P. (2010). The European Union and the Global South. Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F., & Tavares, R. (2008). The African Union and the regional economic communities: 3 Scenarios for 2018–2028. Report commissioned by the Swedish Armed Forces (August). Swedish Armed Forces.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapel, S. (2022). Regional organizations and democracy, human rights, and the rule of law: The African Union, organization of Americas States, and the diffusion of institutions. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapel, S., & Söderbaum, F. (2020). Mapping and problematising external funding to the African Union and the regional economic communities. In U. Engel & F. Mattheis (Eds.), The finances of regional organisations in the Global South: Follow the money (pp. 112–125). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sören Stapel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Söderbaum, F., Stapel, S. (2022). External Actors and Security Regionalism in Africa: A New Dataset on External Funding. In: Muntschick, J. (eds) Regionalism in Africa and External Partners. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10702-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics