Skip to main content

The Origins of Complementarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complementarity in Organizations
  • 439 Accesses

Abstract

At the acclaimed ‘Solvay’ conference in 1927, two Nobel Prize winners—Albert Einstein (Nobel Prize in Physics, 1921) and Niels Bohr (Nobel Prize in Physics, 1922)—went head- to- head over their differences of opinion on a field of quantum science—the nature of light. Their disagreement was about the contradictions at the heart of quantum theory. Out of this debate, the term complementarity was used to explain a situation in which two theories which were thought to be mutually exclusive were both required to explain a single phenomenon. However, quantum physics was not the only area in which complementarity theory and practice were considered. In economics and business management a range of ideas have emerged with both strategic and operational applicability. These include quantitative complementarity occurs when an increase in the quantity of one good leads to an increase in the value of another; qualitative complementarity is when an increase in the quality of one good leads to an increase in the value of quality of another good such as a suit paired with a tie. Other variations were classified as complementarities-in-performance and complementarities-in-use. The former approach tests the economic value of combining different activities and practices whilst the latter investigates the links between two sets of activities, suggesting that one practice often requires other practice. From these many interpretations have emerged a concept that has the potential to offer competitive progression to organisations in this dynamic new environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afanasyev, V. S., Medvedeva, Y. M., & Abdulov, R. E. (2015). Niels Bohr’s principle of complementarities in political economy. European Research Studies, 18(4 SI), 275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andler, D. (2006). Federalism in science: Complementarity vs. perspectivism: Reply to Harré. Synthese, 151(3), 519–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnarson, B. T. (2020). The superstar and the followers: Intra-firm product complementarity in international trade. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 117, 277–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arranz, N., Arroyabe, M. F., Li, J., & de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2019). An integrated model of organisational innovation and firm performance: Generation, persistence and complementarity. Journal of Business Research, 105, 270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aversa, P., Haefliger, S., Hueller, F., & Reza, D. G. (2020). Customer complementarity in the digital space: Exploring Amazon’s business model diversification. Long Range Planning, 54, 101985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bala, A. (2017). Complementarity beyond physics. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y. (2018). Design rules, volume 2: How technology shapes organisations, Chapter 5 Complementarity. Working Paper 19-036. Harvard Business School, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao, Y., von Stosch, A., Park, M., & Pöppel, E. (2017). Complementarity as generative principle: A thought pattern for aesthetic appreciations and cognitive appraisals in general. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beluco, A., Souza, P. K., Livi, F. P., & Caux, J. (2015). Energetic complementarity with hydropower and the possibility of storage in batteries and water reservoirs. In B. Sorensen (Ed.), Solar energy storage. Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S., Khwaja, A., Kumar, V., et al. (2021). Structural models of complementary choices. Marketing Letters, 25, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilan, Y., Vasilyeva, T., Lyeonov, S., & Bagmet, K. (2019). Institutional complementarity for social and economic development. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, T. R. (1971). Sensuous-intellectual complementarity in science. Science, 172(3987), 1003–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N. (1957). Atomic physics and human knowledge. Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A. (2010). New forms of complementarity in science. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy, 48(4), 355–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borodina, O. (2015). Complementarity principle in scientific research: An interdisciplinary discourse. Economy and Forecasting, 2, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brave, S. A., & Mattoon, R. H. (2020). Explaining urban economic growth through cluster complementarity. Growth and Change, 51(1), 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. C. (2017). A metasynthesis of the complementarity of culturally responsive and inquiry-based science education in K-12 settings: Implications for advancing equitable science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1143–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & Milgrom, P. (2013). Complementarity in organizations. In R. S. Gibbons & J. Roberts (Eds.), The handbook of organizational economics. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camargo, L. A. S., Guarnier, E., Witzler, L. T., & Ramos, D. S. (2013). A business model to incentivize hydro companies’ inversions in wind and biomass power plants. 4th International Youth Conference on Energy (IYCE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. D., Chuan, M., Zhao, Q., Wang, J. L., Huang, C. K., & Lee, N. C. A. (2017). Exploring sharing economy success: Resource based view and the role of resource complementarity in business value co-creation. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Zeng, S., Yu, B., & Xue, H. (2020). Complementarity in open innovation and corporate strategy: The moderating effect of ownership and location strategies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 754–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B., Poon, S. K., & Davis, J. G. (2006). Effects of knowledge management strategy on organisational performance: A complementarity theory-based approach. Omega, The International Journal of Management Science, 36, 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Climent, R. C., & Cakir, G. (2021). Business model themes and product market strategies as value drivers in omni-channel retail: A set of propositions. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting Perspectives, 2(3), 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwish, T. K., Wood, G., Singh, S., & Singh, R. (2020). Human resource management in India: Performance and complementarity. European Management Review, 17(2), 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryer, D. C., & Horowitz, L. M. (1997). When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 592–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, H., Goodridge, P., & Haskel, J. (2021). The Internet of Things and economic growth in a panel of countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 30(3), 262–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedele, A., & Mantovani, A. (2008). Complementarity, coordination, and credit. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (Jite) / Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 164(2), 230–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizabadi, J., Gligor, D. M., & Alibakhshi, S. (2021). Examining the synergistic effect of supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment: A complementarity perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 26(4), 514–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felton, L., Jowett, S., Begg, C., & Zhong, X. (2021). A multistudy examination of the complementarity dimension of the coach–athlete relationship. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 10(1), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P. (2000). Complementarity theory: Why human social capacities evolved to require cultural complements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 76–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlan, A., Vinelli, A., & Dal Pont, G. (2011). Complementarity and lean manufacturing bundles: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 31(8), 835–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, D. Y. (Ed.). (2004). Complementarity, duality and symmetry in non-linear mechanics. Springer Science + Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Blanco, J., Coca-Pérez, J. L., & Guisado-González, M. (2019). Relations between technological and non-technological innovations in the service sector. Service Industries Journal, 39(2), 134–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A., & Furnari, S. (2008). A chemistry of organisation: Combinatory analysis and design. Organisation Studies, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088023

  • Grazzi, M., Piccardo, C., & Vergari, C. (2019). Concordance and complementarity in IP instruments. LEM Working Paper Series, 19, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grygar, F. (2017). Bohr’s complementarity framework in biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 10(1), 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. S., Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. (2001). Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. Journal of Management, 27(6), 679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Home, D. (2013). Bohr’s philosophy of wave-particle complementarity. Resonance: Journal of Science Education, 18(10), 905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosono, K., Miyakawa, D., Takizawa, M., & Yamanouchi, K. (2020). Complementarity between tangible and intangible capital. The Singapore Economic Review, 65(5), 1293–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, P.-F. (2013). Integrating ERP and e-business: Resource complementarity in business value creation. Decision Support Systems, 56, 334–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsumori, M. (2011). Niels Bohr’s complementarity. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kinderis, R. (2019). Identification of business model complementarity and the factors that determine it in the Klaipeda city incoming tourism. Journal of Tourism and Services, 10(19), 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox-Hayes, J. (2009). The developing carbon financial service industry: Expertise, adaptation and complementarity in London and New York. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 749–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn, J. (2020). Strategic complementarities in bank branching decisions. Journal of Industrial Economics, 68(4), 640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L. M. (1947). Complementarity and substitution in the theory of capital. Economica, 14(54), 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K., & Foss, N. J. (2003). New Human Resource Management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenfant, J.-S. (2006). Complementarity and demand theory: From the 1920s to the 1940s. History of Political Economy, 38(Suppl 1), 48–85. Duke University Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Y., & Li, Y. (2019). Complementarity effect of supply chain competencies on innovation capability. Business Process Management Journal, 25(6), 1251–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Wang, X., & Ren, W. (2020). A bundling sales strategy for a two-stage supply chain based on the complementarity elasticity of imperfect complementary products. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 35(6), 983–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., Zhang, Y., Zeng, F., & Qu, Z. (2020). Complementarity and cannibalization of offline-to-online targeting: A field experiment on omnichannel commerce. MIS Quarterly, 44(2), 957–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2016). Analysis of complementarities: Framework and examples from the energy transition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990, June). The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy and organisation. American Economic Review, 80, 511–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. (2012). The impact of the principle of complementarity: On philosophy, science, technology and the human experience. Cogito: Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(3), 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montes, J. O. (2016). Impacts of 3D printing on the development of new business models. IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit (E-TEMS), IEEE, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, V., Ferreira, R., & Filardi, F. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and complementarity in complex it projects in Brazil: Dataprev’s experience. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia (RIAE), 19(3), 6–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mothe, C., Nguyen-Thib, U. T., & Nguyen-Van, P. (2015). Assessing complementarity in organizational innovations for technological innovation: The role of knowledge management practices. Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1011320

  • Najda-Janoszka, M. (2018). Towards platform defined business—Complementarity at the spotlight. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie: Emerging Challenges in Modern Management, 32, 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndubisi, N. O., Dayan, M., Yeniaras, V., & Al-hawari, M. (2020). The effects of complementarity of knowledge and capabilities on joint innovation capabilities and service innovation: The role of competitive intensity and demand uncertainty. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neves, A., Teixeira, A. A. C., & Silva, S. T. (2016). Exports-R&D investment complementarity and economic performance of firms located in Portugal. Investigación Económica, 75(295), 125–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, H., Kristensen, T. B., & Grasso, L. P. (2018). The performance effects of complementary management control mechanisms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(11), 2124–2148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padmanabhuni, S., Ganesh, J., & Moitra, D. (2004). Web services, grid computing, and business process management: Exploiting complementarities for business agility. Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Web Services, 666–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo, R. P., & Rana, P. B. (2015). Complementarity between regional and global financial governance institutions: The case of ASEAN+3 and the global financial safety net. Global Governance, 21(3), 413–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmigiani, A., & Mitchell, W. (2009). Complementarity, capabilities, and the boundaries of the firm: The impact of within-firm and interfirm expertise on concurrent sourcing of complementary components. Strategic Management Journal, 30(10), 1065–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plotnitsky, A. (1994). Complementarity. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plotnitsky, A. (2013). Nils Bohr and complementarity—An introduction. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popa, S., Soto-Acosta, P., & Loukis, E. (2016). Analyzing the complementarity of web infrastructure and eInnovation for business value generation. Program, 50(1), 118–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puka, R., & Jedrusik, S. (2021). A new measure of complementarity in market basket data. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16, 670–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz, M., Tallon, P. P., Coltman, T., Sharma, R., & Reynolds, P. (2020). Aligning the IT portfolio with business strategy: Evidence for complementarity of corporate and business unit alignment. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(3), 101623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld, J., Schilling, M. A., & Bellavitis, C. (2019). Platform strategy: Managing ecosystem value through selective promotion of complements. Organisation Science, 30(6), 1232–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1974). Complementarity: An essay on the 40th anniversary of the Hicks-Allen revolution in demand theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 12(4), 1255–1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-García, J. Y., Núñez-Ríos, J. E., Soto-Pérez, M., Cardoso-Castro, P. P., & Rodríguez-Magaña, A. (2020). A systems science approach to inter-organisational complementarity in tourism SMEs. Systemic Practice & Action Research, 33(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shomar, T. (2020). Complementarity revisited. Foundations of Science, 25(2), 401–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soda, G., & Furlotti, M. (2017). Bringing tasks back in: An organizational theory of resource complementarity and partner selection. Journal of Management, 43(2), 348–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanov, A., & Zubanov, N. (2019). Skill complementarity in production technology: New empirical evidence and implications. IZA Institute of Labour Economics, 12433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1986). 285 Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topkiss, D. M. (1998). Supermodularity and complementarity. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, P., & Augusto, M. (2020). Understanding complementarities among different forms of innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(5), 813–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaurai, K. (2018). Complementarity between foreign aid and financial development as a driver of economic growth in selected emerging markets. Comparative Economic Research, 21(4), 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, F. (2017). Many strategies fail because they’re not actually strategies. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2017/11/many-strategies-fail-because-theyre-not-actually-strategies

  • Vishwanatha, K., Hakelind, C., Steinvall, A., Svensson, J., & Deutschmann, M. (2021). Interpersonal complementarity and gender: Contextual influences on perception of personality. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 49(6), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., & Busemeyer, J. (2015). Reintroducing the concept of complementarity into psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, K. A., & Whalen, C. J. (2018). The circular economy and institutional economics: Compatibility and complementarity. Journal of Economic Issues, 52(3), 605–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilczek, F. (2021, January 12). The mind-expanding power of complementarity. Scientific American.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woudstra, U., Berghout, E., Tan, C.-W., van Eekeren, P., & Deden, G. (2017). Resource complementarity and IT economies of scale: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. Information Systems Management, 34(2), 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D. J., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2017). A two-stage model of generating product advice: Proposing and testing the complementarity principle. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3, 826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Kemppainen, L., Ahokangas, P., & Pikkarainen, M. (2020). Opportunity complementarity in data-driven business models. Journal of Business Models, 8(2), 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ying Liao, & Yulong Li. (2018). Complementarity effect of supply chain competencies on innovation capability. Business Process Management Journal, 25(6), 1251–1272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younsi, M., Bechtini, M., & Khemili, H. (2021). The effects of foreign aid, foreign direct investment and domestic investment on economic growth in African countries: Nonlinearities and complementarities. African Development Review, 33(1), 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, L., Hurley, T. M., Kliebenstein, J., & Orazem, P. (2011). Testing for complementarity and substitutability among multiple technologies: The case of U.S. hog farms. Iowa State University Working Paper, No. 08026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Tianshu, & Zhao Shijun. (2010). The business measurement of industrial complementarity: A methodology perspective. 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, 293–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., Liu, Z., Li, J., & Jiao, H. (2019). Technology complementarity and collaborative innovation: The moderating effects of IT adoption. IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K. (2004). The complementarity of information technology infrastructure and e-commerce capability. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 167–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Turner, P. (2022). The Origins of Complementarity. In: Complementarity in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10654-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics