Skip to main content

On the Modelling of Species Distribution: Logistic Regression Versus Density Probability Function

  • 499 Accesses

Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS,volume 507)

Abstract

The concerns related to climate changes have been gaining attention in the last few years due to the negative impacts on the environment, economy, and society. To better understand and anticipate the effects of climate changes in the distribution of species, several techniques have been adopted comprising models of different complexity. In general, these models apply algorithms and statistical methods capable of predicting in a particular study area, the locations considered suitable for a species to survive and reproduce, given a set of eco-geographical variables that influence species behavior. Logistic regression algorithm and Probability density function are two common methods that can be used to model the species suitability. The former is a representative of a class of models that requires the availability (or imputation) of presence-absence data whereas the latter represents the models that only require presence data. Both approaches are compared regarding the capability to accurately predict the environmental suitability for species. On a different way, the behaviour of the species in the projected environments are analysed by simulating its potential distribution in the projected environment. A case study reporting results from two types of species with economical interest is presented: the strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo) in mainland Portugal, and the Apis mellifera (African Lineage) in the Iberian Peninsula.

Keywords

  • Agent-based modelling and simulation
  • Species distribution models
  • Environmental modelling
  • Logistic regression
  • Density probability function
  • Pseudo-absence data

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-10464-0_25
  • Chapter length: 14 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-031-10464-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

References

  1. Barbet-Massin, M., Jiguet, F., Albert, C.H., Thuiller, W.: Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many? Meth. Ecol. Evol. 3(2), 327–338 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaumont, L.J., et al.: Which species distribution models are more (or less) likely to project broad-scale, climate-induced shifts in species ranges? Ecol. Model. 342, 135–146 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Bioco, J., Prata, P., Canovas, F., Fazendeiro, P.: \(SDSim\): a generalized user friendly web ABM system to simulate spatiotemporal distribution of species under environmental scenarios. Environ. Model. Softw. 147, 105234 (2022)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Burrough, P.A., McDonnell, R.A.: Principles of Geographical Information Systems, p. 190. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cánovas, F., De la Rúa, P., Serrano, J., Galián, J.: Analysis of a contact area between two distinct evolutionary honeybee units: an ecological perspective. J. Insect Conserv. 18(5), 927–937 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9701-1

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Danielson, J.J., Gesch, D.B.: Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010). US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elith, J., et al.: Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29(2), 129–151 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Engler, R., Guisan, A., Rechsteiner, L.: An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. J. Appl. Ecol. 41(2), 263–274 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G., Jarvis, A.: Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25(15), 1965–1978 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, C., Newell, G., White, M.: The effect of sample size on the accuracy of species distribution models: considering both presences and pseudo-absences or background sites. Ecography 42(3), 535–548 (2019)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearce, J., Ferrier, S.: An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression. Ecol. Model. 128(2–3), 127–147 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P., Schapire, R.E.: Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190(3–4), 231–259 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Ribeiro, M.M., et al.: Bioclimatic modeling in the Last Glacial Maximum, Mid-Holocene and facing future climatic changes in the strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo L.). PLoS ONE 14(1), e0210062 (2019)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Robertson, M.P., Caithness, N., Villet, M.H.: A PCA-based modelling technique for predicting environmental suitability for organisms from presence records. Divers. Distrib. 7(1–2), 15–27 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. VanDerWal, J., Shoo, L.P., Graham, C., Williams, S.E.: Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: how far should you stray from what you know? Ecol. Model. 220(4), 589–594 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Wisz, M.S., Guisan, A.: Do pseudo-absence selection strategies influence species distribution models and their predictions? An information-theoretic approach based on simulated data. BMC Ecol. 9(1), 1–13 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Zaniewski, A.E., Lehmann, A., McC Overton, J.: Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns. Ecol. Model. 157(2–3), 261–280 (2002)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by operation Centro-01-0145-FEDER-000019 - C4 - Centro de Competências em Cloud Computing, cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Programa Operacional Regional do Centro (Centro 2020), in the scope of the Sistema de Apoio à Investigação Científica e Tecnológica - Programas Integrados de IC&DT. This work was also funded by FCT/MCTES through national funds and when applicable co-funded EU funds under the project UIDB/50008/2020.

We thank all the authors of the paper [13] for providing the occurrence data used in the first case study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Bioco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bioco, J., Prata, P., Canovas, F., Fazendeiro, P. (2022). On the Modelling of Species Distribution: Logistic Regression Versus Density Probability Function. In: Arai, K. (eds) Intelligent Computing. SAI 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 507. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10464-0_25

Download citation