Abstract
The German philosopher Peter Sloterdijk seemed to agree with Heidegger’s critique of humanism when he delivered a Conference address at Elmau in 1999. He rejected, however, the way Heidegger used the metaphor of a shepherd to explain the proper essence of the human and developed a counter-position and a contrary understanding of shepherding that he considered truer to contemporary times. During his speech, Sloterdijk used some examples from Plato’s Statesman to support a distinction between good breeding and civility and thus implied that humanistic education had to incorporate efforts to promote biomedical improvements in the human condition, effectively broadening the work of education centred traditionally on the “reading of good books.” Did Sloterdijk then commit himself to some kind of eugenic programme? He immediately denied this. Did his view amount to a logical progression from Heidegger’s position or was it a radical departure? To clarify this question, this paper first sketches out Heidegger’s argument as put forward in the Letter on Humanism, then notes Sloterdijk’s response to Heidegger’s analysis before finally attempting to identify some key differences between these writers on the issue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I use Frank A. Capuzzi’s translation in conjunction with J. Glenn Gray in Krell (ed.) 2011, p. 147.
- 2.
I use Rowe’s translation in (Cooper 1997).
References
Arenas, L. 2003. El fin del hombre como fin? Cronica de la polemica Sloterdijk-Habermas. Pasajes 12: 70–81.
Asshauer, Thomas. 1999. The Zarathustra Project. Die Zeit, September 2.
Cooper, John M., ed. 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.
Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Mark A. Wrathall, eds. 2007. A Companion to Heidegger. Vol. 35, Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Malden/Oxford/Carlton: Blackwell.
Heidegger, Martin. 1995. The Fundamental Conceptxs of Metaphysics. Translated by William McNeill and Nicholas Walker. Edited by John Sallis. In Studies in Continental Thought. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
———. 2011. Letter on Humanism. In Martin Heidegger Basic Writings, ed. David Farrell Krell. London/New York: Routledge.
Jonas, Hans. 1992. The Gnostic Religion. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
———. 2015. The Gnostic Religion: The Message of the Alien God and the Beginnings of Christianity. Beacon Press.
Krell, David Farrell, ed. 2008. Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings. London/Toronto/Sydney/New Delhi/Auckland: HarperCollins.
———, ed. 2011. Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings. London/New York: Routledge.
Long, F. 2017. Transhuman Education? Sloterdijk’s Reading of Heidegger’s Letter on Humanism. Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (1): 177–192.
Sloterdijk, Peter. 1987. Critique of Cynical Reason. Trans. Michael Eltred. Vol. 40, Theory and History of Literature. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.
———. 1999. Frankfurter Rundshau. 31 July.
———. 2007. Neither Sun nor Death. Trans. Steve Corcoran. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
———. 2009. Rules for the Human Zoo: A Response to the Letter on Humanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27: 12–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Long, F. (2023). Sloterdijk and Heidegger on the Question of Humanism. In: Hornbuckle, C.A., Smith, J.S., Smith, W.S. (eds) Posthumanism and Phenomenology. Analecta Husserliana, vol 125. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10414-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10414-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10413-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10414-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)