Skip to main content

District Energy: Investment Project Appraisal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Low Temperature District Heating

Abstract

This chapter presents utility models and project selection criteria for energy and district heating related investments. Utility models are key for attracting investment of different sources for large scale projects. In these cases, guarantees are typically required, which are typically a mixture of stable business environment and liability from public sources. The correct selection of projects requires of a mixture of economic and social criteria, which is typically specific to each site, and is transposed into a set of metrics and performance criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    i.e. renewable energy systems such as solar thermal & photovoltaics and heat pumps, and even traditional natural gas boiler systems.

  2. 2.

    Large solar thermal, heat pumps (potentially with renewable/very cheap electricity), etc.

  3. 3.

    This criterion is found under various names, here are some: pay off period, cut-off period, recoupment period, pay-back period, pay out period.

  4. 4.

    Thus, depending on the size of the discount rate, some limit may be drawn in the future from when the results will have very little effect on the total present value. For discount rates over 10%, this is probably a period of 25 years. For example, at a discount rate of 14%, the result obtained in the year 50 will have a present value of 0.1% of its nominal amount.

  5. 5.

    Social opportunity costs are a measure of the social value of the next best alternative use of investment funds.

References

  1. UK. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. Heat Networks Investment Project. Delivering Financial Supports for Heat Networks. England and Wales. Retrieved April 11, 2022, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/748477/hnip-launch.pdf.

  2. Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A Mathematical Theory of Saving. The Economic Journal, 38(152), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dasgupta, P., & Marglin, S. P. (1972) Guidelines for Project Evaluation, United Nations Industrial Development Organisation, 1972, Retrieved Feb 05, 2022, from https://www.unido.org/researchers/publications (2022/05/02)

  4. Harberger, A. C. (1976). Project Evaluation—Collected Papers. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Layard, R., & Glaister, S. (Eds.). (1994). Cost-Benefit Analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521942

  6. Little, I. M. D., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1976). Project Appraisal and Planning for Developing Countries. Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mishan, E. J., Euston Q. (2021). Cost-Benefit Analysis, 6th Edn, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Squire, L., & Van der Tak, H. G. (1975) Economic Analysis of Projects, A World Bank Research Publication. Baltimore, and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2018) Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 5th Edition, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bonner, S. (2022). Social Cost Benefit Analysis and Economic Evaluation. The University of Queensland,

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nas, T. F. (2018). Cost-Benefit Analysis, Theory and Application. 2nd Edn. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  12. OECD. (2018). Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Further Developments and Policy Use. OECD Publishing, Paris,. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085169-en

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Rus, G. (2021). Introduction to Cost–Benefit Analysis, Looking for Reasonable Shortcuts, 2nd Edn. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sunstein, C. R. (2018). The Cost-Benefit Revolution. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg Gebrail .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 TECNALIA

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vujnović, M., Gebrail, G., Bogdanovic, B., Garay-Martinez, R. (2022). District Energy: Investment Project Appraisal. In: Garay-Martinez, R., Garrido-Marijuan, A. (eds) Handbook of Low Temperature District Heating. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10410-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10410-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10409-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10410-7

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics