Abstract
This chapter theorizes America’s unique power to recognize, and thereby legitimize, ostensive pariahs and rogues in international society. Existing literature on the politics of recognition typically focuses on relations of mutual recognition. But many recognition conflicts occur in hierarchical contexts. The U.S. is in a unique position to grant recognition and legitimacy to the identities, rights and behaviors of all states in the international system and does not require recognition in return. I argue that this power is a consequence of the kind of post-World War II order the U.S. created—one that has both coercion and consent characteristics. To illustrate this dynamic, the chapter turns to the context of U.S. nuclear diplomacy with India while negotiating the 2008 civil nuclear agreement and Iran while negotiating the 2015 nuclear deal. Both states have a long history of wrapping recognition concerns into the bargaining process. But such recognition-seeking only reinforces an order in which the U.S. stands firm as the recognizing agent without needing recognition in return. The chapter ends with a consideration of whether China, a challenger to U.S. hegemony, will supplant the U.S.’s power to recognize in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, Joel. 1995. Translator’s Introduction. In The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, ed. Axel Honneth, trans. Joel Anderson, x–xxi. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Arms Control Association. Timeline of Nuclear Diplomacy with Iran. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Timeline-of-Nuclear-Diplomacy-With-Iran. Accessed 10 May 2022.
Biswas, Shampa. 2014. Nuclear Desire: Power and the Postcolonial Nuclear Order. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Cox, Robert. 1983. Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 12 (2): 162–175.
Daase, Christopher, Caroline Fehl, Anna Geis, and Georgios Kolliarakis. 2015. Recognition in International Relations: Rethinking a Political Concept in a Global Context. New York, NY: Palgrave.
Dahl, Fredrik. 2013. Q&A: Is There a ‘Right’ to Enrich Uranium? Iran Says Yes, U.S. No. Reuters, November 23. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-rights/qa-is-there-a-right-to-enrich-uranium-iran-says-yes-u-s-no-idUSBRE9AL0R120131123.
Davis, Marybeth, James Lecky, Torrey Froscher, David Chen, Abel Kerevel, and Stephen Schlaikjer. 2013. China-Iran: A Limited Partnership. Prepared for US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/China-Iran--A%20Limited%20Partnership.pdf. Accessed 6 May 2022.
Duncombe, Constance. 2016. Representation, Recognition, and Foreign Policy in the Iran-U.S. Relationship. European Journal of International Relations 22 (3): 622–645.
Farid, May, and Hui Li. 2021. NGOs as Intermediaries in China’s ‘Going Out’ Strategy. International Affairs 97 (6): 1945–1962.
Fassihi, Farnaz, and Steven Lee Myers. 2021. China, with $400 Billion Iran Deal Could Deepen Influence in the Middle East. The New York Times, March 27. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/27/world/middleeast/china-iran-deal.html. Accessed 10 January 2022.
Freedman, Joshua. 2021. The Recognition Dilemma: Negotiating Identity in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. International Studies Quarterly 65 (1): 122–135.
Garver, John. 2006. China and Iran: Ancient Partners in a Post-Imperial World. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
Garver, John. 2016. China and Iran: An Emerging Partnership Post-Sanctions. Middle East Institute, February 8. https://www.mei.edu/publications/china-and-iran-emerging-partnership-post-sanctions. Accessed 6 May 2022.
Honneth, Axel. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Ikenberry, G. John. 2012. Liberal Leviathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jaishankar, Dhruva. 2016. India-U.S., Looking Back: Highs, Lows, and Steady Progress. Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/research/india-u-s-looking-back-highs-lows-and-steady-progress/. Accessed 6 May 2022.
Keck, Zachary. 2013. Solving Iran’s Right to Enrich Dilemma: The Taiwan Precedent. The Diplomat, November 19. https://thediplomat.com/2013/11/solving-irans-right-to-enrich-dilemma-the-taiwan-precedent/. Accessed 6 May 2022.
Kessler, Glenn. 2006. India Nuclear Deal May Face Hard Sell. NBC News, April 3. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna12125842. Accessed 6 May 2022.
Kleine-Ahlbrandt, Stephanie, and Andrew Small. 2008. China’s New Dictatorship Diplomacy: Is Beijing Parting with Pariahs? Foreign Affairs 38: 38–56.
Markell, Patchen. 2003. Bound by Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mousavian, Seyed Hossein. 2012. The Iranian Nuclear Crisis: A Memoir. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Mousavian, Seyed Hossein, and Mohammad Mehdi Mousavian. 2018. Building on the Iran Nuclear Deal for International Peace and Security. Journal of Peace and Nuclear Disarmament 1 (1): 169–192.
Murray, Michelle. 2019. The Struggle for Recognition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Nuclear Threat Intiative. Iran. https://www.nti.org/learn/countries/iran/nuclear/. Accessed 6 May 2022.
Obama, Barack. 2015. Statement by the President on Iran. July 14. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/07/14/statement-president-iran. Accessed 6 May 2022.
Ringmar, Erik. 2002. The Recognition Game: Soviet Russia Against the West. Cooperation and Conflict 37 (2): 115–136.
Ringmar, Erik. 2014. Recognition and the Origins of International Society. Global Discourse 4 (4): 446–458.
Saran, Shyam. 2017. How India Sees the World: Kautilya to the 21st Century. New Delhi: Juggernaut Books.
Sasikumar, Karthika. 2007. India’s Emergence as a ‘Responsible’ Nuclear Power. International Journal 62: 825–844.
Sherman, Wendy. 2018. Not for the Faint of Heart: Lessons in Courage, Power, and Persistence. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
Tannenwald, Nina. 2013. Justice and Fairness in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. Ethics and International Politics 27 (3): 299–317.
Times of India. 2021. Nuclear Suppliers Group and India’s Membership: Key Points. November 1. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/nuclear-suppliers-group-and-indias-membership-bid-key-points/articleshow/87471341.cms. Accessed 6 May 2022.
Turk, Natasha. 2021. Iranian President Raisi lambasts U.S. at First U.N. Speech, Biden Proposes Compliance to Nuclear Deal. CNBC, September 22. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/22/irans-raisi-lambasts-us-at-un-biden-proposes-nuclear-deal-compliance.html. Accessed 6 May 2022.
U.S. State Department. 2005. Joint Statement by President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. July 18. https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/sca/rls/pr/2005/49763.htm. Accessed 6 May 2022.
Wintour, Patrick. 2021. U.S. Seeks Russian and Chinese Support to Salvage Iran Nuclear Deal. The Guardian, December 5. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/05/us-seeks-china-and-russia-support-to-salvage-iran-nuclear-deal. Accessed 6 May 2022.
Zarif, Mohammad Javad. 2014. Iran Is Committed to a Peaceful Nuclear Program. The Washington Post, June 13. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mohammad-javad-zarif-iran-is-committed-to-a-peaceful-nuclear-program/2014/06/13/491fc982-f197-11e3-bf76-447a5df6411f_story.html. Accessed 6 May 2022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hamidi, S. (2022). Who Recognizes? U.S. Nuclear Diplomacy and the Conferral of Legitimacy. In: Stricof, M., Vagnoux, I. (eds) U.S. Leadership in a World of Uncertainties. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10260-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10260-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10259-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10260-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)