Skip to main content

Corporatisation in Local Government: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporatisation in Local Government

Abstract

This book sets the stage for the first comprehensive cross-country comparison of corporatisation in local government. The opening chapter provides the backdrop for 19 country chapters by explaining the empirical phenomenon and defining the concept of corporatisation. It also introduces a typology identifying different types of municipally owned corporations (MOCs) which guides the country chapters and supports the comparative aims of the book. MOCs are presented as a middle ground between public and private service provision—as a compromise between democratically governed bureaucracy and commercially oriented market. Corporatisation provides benefits and implies challenges, a balancing act which involves both overriding principles of democracy, effectiveness and service quality and practicalities of corporate form, HR policies, and monitoring and control mechanisms. Although this balancing act unfolds in many different ways in the countries represented in this book, the variation is considerably influenced by the public administration traditions to which they belong. Thus, we use these traditions in the shape of a local government typology to group the country chapters accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, R. (2022). Organizational publicness and mortality: Explaining the dissolution of local authority companies. Public Management Review, 24(3), 350–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R., Ferry, L., Skelcher, C., & Wegorowski, P. (2020). Corporatization in the public sector: Explaining the growth of local government companies. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 482–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldersheim, H., & Rose, L. (Eds.). (2010). Territorial choice: The politics of boundaries and borders. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bel, G., & Gradus, R. (2018). Privatisation, contracting-out and inter-municipal cooperation: New developments in local public service delivery. Local Government Studies, 44(1), 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berge, D. M., & Torsteinsen, H. (2021a). Governance challenges of different institutional logics and modes of organising: A Norwegian case study of municipal water supply. Local Government Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.1942853

  • Berge, D. M., & Torsteinsen, H. (2021b). Corporatization in local government – Promoting cultural differentiation and hybridity? Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12737.

  • Bergh, A., Erlingsson, G. Ó., & Wittberg, E. (2021). What happens when municipalities run corporations? Empirical evidence from 290 Swedish municipalities. Local Government Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.1944857

  • Bernier, L., Bance, P., & Florio, M. (2020). The Routledge handbook of state-owned enterprises. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blom, R., Borst, R. T., & Voorn, B. (2021). Pathology or inconvenience? A meta-analysis of the impact of red tape on people and organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(4), 623–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdeaux, C. (2007). Reexamining the claim of public authority efficacy. Administration & Society, 39(1), 77–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdeaux, C. (2008). Politics versus professionalism: The effect of institutional structure on democratic decision making in a contested policy arena. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(3), 349–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsen, T., & Karré, P. M. (2011). Hybrid organizations: No cause for concern? International Journal of Public Administration, 34(13), 827–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambini, C., Filippini, M., Piacenza, M., & Vannoni, D. (2011). Corporatization and firm performance: Evidence from publicly-provided local utilities. Review of Law & Economics, 7(1), 191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citroni, G., Lippi, A., & Profeti, S. (2013). Representation through corporatisation: Municipal corporations in Italy as arenas for local democracy. European Political Science Review, 7(1), 63–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf, E., & Gradus, R. (2007). Collusion in the Dutch waste collection market. Local Government Studies, 33(4), 573–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management, 14(3), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, L., Andrews, R., Skelcher, C., & Wegorowski, P. (2018). New development: Corporatization of local authorities in England in the wake of austerity 2010–2016. Public Money & Management, 38(6), 477–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossi, G., Papenfuß, U., & Tremblay, M. (2015). Corporate governance and accountability of state-owned enterprises: Relevance for science and society and interdisciplinary research perspectives. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(4), 274–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hefetz, A., Warner, M. E., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2012). Privatization and intermunicipal contracting: The US local government experience 1992–2007. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 675–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klausen, J. E., & Winsvold, M. (2019). Corporate governance and democratic accountability: Local state-owned enterprises in Norway. Journal of Public Policy, 41(1), 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S., & Bouckaert, G. (Eds.). (2016). Local public sector reforms in times of crisis. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2019). Introduction to comparative public administration. Administrative systems and reforms in Europe (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1936). Politics: Who gets what, when, how. Whittlesey House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, W. M., & Morris, J. C. (2004). In search of middle ground: The public authority as an alternative to privatization. Public Works Management & Policy, 9(2), 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidström, A. (1998). The comparative study of local government systems—a research agenda. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 1(1), 97–115. (Published online 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidström, A. (2017). Public authorities and intermunicipal cooperation in a European context. Urban Affairs Review, 53(2), 403–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. H. (2014). Public value accounting: Establishing the philosophical basis. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 465–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohemeng, F. K., & Grant, J. K. (2008). When markets fail to deliver: An examination of the privatization and de-privatization of water and wastewater services delivery in Hamilton. Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 51(3), 475–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papenfuß, U. (2020). Corporate governance of state-owned enterprises: Conceptualization, challenges and perspectives for the public corporate governance field. In L. Bernier, P. Bance, & E. Florio (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of state-owned enterprises (pp. 433–444). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Papenfuβ, U., & Keppeler, F. (2020). Does performance-related pay and public service motivation research treat state-owned enterprises like a neglected Cinderella? A systematic literature review and agenda for future research on performance effects. Public Management Review, 22(7), 1119–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papenfuß, U., & Schmidt, C. (2021). Personnel governance of corporatized public services: Effects of executive resources and corporation forms on turnover. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12752

  • Pierre, J. (2009). Reinventing governance, reinventing democracy. Policy and Politics, 37(4), 591–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoute, M., Budding, T., & Gradus, R. (2017). Municipalities’ choices of service delivery modes: The influence of service, political, governance, and financial characteristics. International Public Management Journal, 21(4), 502–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, C., Bouckaert, G., & Kuhlmann, S. (Eds.). (2017). The future of local government in Europe. Lessons from research and practice in 31 countries. Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swianiewicz, P. (2014). An empirical typology of local government systems in Eastern Europe. Local Government Studies, 40(2), 292–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, A. F. (2017). Ten years after: Revisiting the determinants of the adoption of municipal corporations for local service delivery. Local Government Studies, 43(5), 697–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, A. F., & Camoes, P. (2007). Local service delivery choices in Portugal: A political transaction costs framework. Local Government Studies, 33(4), 535–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torsteinsen, H. (2019). Debate: Corporatization in local government – The need for a comparative and multi-disciplinary research approach. Public Money & Management, 39(1), 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torsteinsen, H., & Van Genugten, M. (2016). Waste management in the Netherlands and Norway – From in-house provision to inter-municipal cooperation. In S. Kuhlman & G. Bouckaert (Eds.), Local public sector reforms in times of crisis: National trajectories and international comparisons (pp. 205–220). Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vakkuri, J., Johanson, J.-E., Feng, N. C., & Giordano, F. (2021). Governance and accountability in hybrid organizations–past, present and future. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 33(3), 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Genugten, M., Van Thiel, S., & Voorn, B. (2020). Local governments and their arm’s length bodies. Local Government Studies, 46(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest, K., Van Thiel, S., Bouckaert, G., & Lægreid, P. (Eds.). (2012). Government agencies: Practices and lessons from 30 countries. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorn, B. (2021). Debate: Shadow government—A note for European corporatization research. Public Money & Management, 41(7), 561–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorn, B., Borst, R. T., & Blom, R. (2020). Business techniques as an explanation of the autonomy-performance link in corporatized entities: Evidence from Dutch Municipally owned corporations. International Public Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1802632

  • Voorn, B., & Van Genugten, M. (2021). Dealing with multiple principals in at arm’s length organisations: A qualitative study of Dutch municipally owned corporations. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12746

  • Voorn, B., Van Genugten, M., & Van Thiel, S. (2017). The efficiency and effectiveness of municipally owned corporations: A systematic review. Local Government Studies, 43(5), 820–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorn, B., Van Genugten, M., & Van Thiel, S. (2021). Re-interpreting re-municipalization: Finding equilibrium. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 24(3), 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorn, B., Van Thiel, S., & Van Genugten, M. L. (2018). Debate: Corporatization as more than a recent crisis-driven development. Public Money & Management, 38(7), 481–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. E., & Aldag, A. M. (2021). Re-municipalization in the US: A pragmatic response to contracting. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 24(3), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollmann, H., & Marcou, G. (2010). Introduction. In H. Wollmann & G. Marcou (Eds.), The provision of public services in Europe: Between state, local government and market (pp. 1–14). Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zafra-Gómez, J. L., Prior, D. P., Díaz, A. M., & López Hernández, A. M. (2013). Reducing costs in times of crisis: Delivery forms in small and medium sized local governments’ waste management services. Public Administration, 91(1), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harald Torsteinsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Torsteinsen, H., Andrews, R., Papenfuß, U., Van Genugten, M., Voorn, B. (2023). Corporatisation in Local Government: An Introduction. In: Van Genugten, M., Voorn, B., Andrews, R., Papenfuß, U., Torsteinsen, H. (eds) Corporatisation in Local Government. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09982-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics