Skip to main content

From Nonlinear Physical Models to Linear Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Automatic Control with Interactive Tools

Abstract

This chapter focuses on how to obtain dynamic linear models from nonlinear physical models through linearization using a Taylor series expansion around a nominal operating point. Several examples are included, so that linear systems with different characteristics are obtained: the tank level system, variable section tank level system, ball & beam system, inverted pendulum on a cart system, and DC motor position system. Main concepts and basic definitions are included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is the property of a system whereby a scaled input results in an equally scaled output, that is, the response of a system to a signal bu(t) is equal to b times the response to u(t).

  2. 2.

    Superposition will apply if and only if the system is linear.

  3. 3.

    In the scope of transfer functions modeling the system dynamics, this concept will be related to the difference or relative degree between the number of poles and finite zeros. If the number of poles and zeros is the same, the system is called causal and there is an instantaneous transmission from the input signal to the output, while if the transfer function is strictly proper (more poles than finite zeros), the system is called strictly causal.

  4. 4.

    Notice that as usual, \(\dot{y}\) represents the time derivative \(\frac{dy(t)}{dt}\), \(\ddot{y}=\frac{d^2y(t)}{dt^2}\) and so on, where t is the independent variable (time), y(t) is the dependent variable (output), and u(t) is the input. Notation \(d^ny(t)/dt^n\) is used to indicate the n-th derivative of y with respect to time. The dependence on time is often obviated to facilitate understanding.

  5. 5.

    The gap metric is an extension of the common measure of the \(\infty \)-norm of the difference between two systems and it is used to measure the gap between a linearization of a nonlinear system at its operating point and a fixed linear system [12].

  6. 6.

    Actuators are the devices that provide the driving power to the process, and therefore, are in charge of converting the control signal into the manipulated variable.

  7. 7.

    If each fluid element at each point in the flow has no net angular velocity about that point, the flow is termed irrotational.

  8. 8.

    The velocity at a given point does not change with time.

  9. 9.

    Bernoulli’s principle can be derived from the principle of conservation of energy. It states that, in a steady flow, the sum of all forms of energy of a fluid along a streamline is the same at all points along the streamline. This requires that the sum of kinetic energy, potential energy, and internal energy remain constant. The hydrostatic pressure across the orifice is \(\varDelta P= \rho g h\). In applications using valves, the volumetric flow is multiplied by a coefficient of discharge.

  10. 10.

    Notice that \((\overline{q},\overline{h})\) is used here to denote the actual operating point representing a steady state of the system. Other texts use different equivalent notations, as \((q_0,h_0)\), \((q_e,h_e)\), ...The notation \((q_0,h_0)\) is sometimes preferred because it also represents the initial state from which the response to changes in the input is studied (initial condition).

  11. 11.

    \(I_b=\frac{2}{5} m R^2\), R being the radius of the ball (see Fig. 2.7).

  12. 12.

    As pointed out by [46], the validity of these assumptions is questionable, depending upon the relative physical features of the system. For many laboratory equipments, the approximations made are felt to be quite justifiable.

  13. 13.

    As pointed out by [49], initially, in the 60s of the last century, this system was present in the control laboratories of the most prestigious universities. The demonstration consisted of initially placing the pendulum manually in the inverted vertical position, then releasing it and autonomously, by feeding back its position, the pendulum would continue in the inverted position by means of the appropriate action on the cart. The control problem, thus considered, is local and its interest lies in the fact that it involves stabilizing an open-loop unstable position. This problem, because of its local character, can be solved with linear methods, as discussed in this book. The problems arise when the pendulum has to be swung up from its natural equilibrium, and that the path of the cart is bounded, so that if one of the ends of the horizontal support is reached, the system stops working.

  14. 14.

    https://cutt.ly/IUohO76; https://cutt.ly/SUohHyy.

  15. 15.

    In [29] (Sect. 2.6.1), the model of the motor is obtained also for the case when the excitation voltage \(e_f\) is varying through a linearization process.

References

  1. D\(^{\prime }\)Azzo, J. J., Houpis, C. H., & Sheldon, S. N. (2003). Linear control system analysis and design with MATLAB® (5th ed.). Marcel Dekker Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rohrs, C. E., Melsa, J. L., & Schultz, D. G. (1994). Sistemas de control lineal (Linear control systems). McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aracil, J., & Gómez-Estern, F. (2005). Notes on automatic regulation. School of Engineering, University of Seville.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Åström, K. J., & Murray, R. M. (2014). Feedback systems: An introduction for scientists and engineers (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Åström, K. J., & Hägglund, T. (2006). Advanced PID control. ISA - The Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dorf, R. C., & Bishop, R. H. (2011). Modern control systems (12th ed.). Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Franklin, G. F., Powell, J. D., & Emani-Naeni, A. (2015). Feedback control of dynamic systems (7th ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nise, N. S. (2015). Control systems engineering (7th ed.). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seborg, D. E., Edgar, T. F., Mellichamp, D. A., & Doyle, F. J., III. (2011). Process dynamics and control (3rd ed.). International Student Version. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bavafa-Toosi, Y. (2017). Introduction to linear control systems. Academic Press-Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roubal, J., Husek, P., & Stecha, J. (2010). Technical committee on control education: A first course in systems and control engineering [technical activities]. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(3), 413–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Qian, D., Yi, J., & Tong, S. (2013). Understanding neighborhood of linearization in undergraduate control education. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 33(4), 54–60.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Johansson, K. H. (2000). The quadruple-tank process: A multivariable laboratory process with an adjustable zero. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 8(3), 456–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guzmán, J. L., Vargas, H., Sánchez-Moreno, J., Rodríguez, F., Berenguel, M., & Dormido, S. (2007). Education research in engineering studies: Interactivity, virtual and remote labs. In Distance Education Research Trends (pp. 131–167). New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bolzern, P., Scattolini, R., & Schiavoni, N. (2009). Fundamentos de control automático (Fundamentals of automatic control). McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burns, R. S. (2006). Advanced control engineering. Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Golnaraghi, F., & Kuo, B. C. (2017). Automatic control systems (10th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ogata, K. (2010). Modern control engineering (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bechhoefer, J. (2021). Control theory for physicists. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bélanger, P. (1995). Control engineering: A modern approach. Saunders College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, C.-T. (1999). Linear system theory and design (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. de Larminat, P. (Ed.). (2007). Analysis and control of linear systems. ISTE.

    Google Scholar 

  23. de Oliveira, M. C. (2017). Fundamentals of linear control. A concise approach. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Esfandiari, R. S., & Lu, B. (2018). Modeling and analysis of dynamic systems (3rd ed.). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Franklin, G. F., Powell, J. D., & Emani-Naeni, A. (2010). Feedback control of dynamic systems (6th ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Golnaraghi, F., & Kuo, B. C. (2010). Automatic control systems (9th ed.). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goodwin, G. C., Graebe, S. F., & Salgado, M. E. (2001). Control system design. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hernández-Guzmán, V. M., & Silva-Ortigoza, R. (2019). Automatic control with experiments. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Keviczky, L., Bars, R., Hetthéssy, J., & Bányász, C. (2019). Control engineering. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kluever, C. A. (2015). Dynamic systems: Modeling, simulation, and control. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  31. KTH (2016). Royal Institute of Technology and Linköpings Universitet, Sweden. Reglerteknik ak med utvalda tentamenstal (automatic control exercises: Computer exercises, laboratory exercises). Retrieved July 01, 2011, from https://cutt.ly/jYkcFZV.

  32. Lobontiu, N. (2010). System dynamics for engineering students. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lund University, Department of Automatic Control, and Faculty of Engineering, Sweden. (2017). Automatic control exercises. Retrieved July 01, 2021, from https://cutt.ly/xUXjNue.

  34. Najim, K. (2006). Control of continuous linear systems. ISTE.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ozbay, H. (1999). Introduction to feedback control theory. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tenreiro Machado, J., Lopes, A. M., Duarte, V., & Galhano, A. M. (2016). Solved problems in dynamical systems and control. The Institution of Engineering and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tripathi, A. N. (1998). Linear system analysis (2nd ed.). New Age International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Veloni, A., & Palamides, A. (2012). Control system problems. Formulas, solutions and simulation tools. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wilkie, J., Johnson, M., & Katebi, R. (2002). Control engineering. An introductory course. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tavakolpour-Saleh, A., Setoodeh, A., & Ansari, E. (2016). Iterative learning control of two coupled nonlinear spherical tanks. International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 10(11), 1862–1869.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Åström, K. J. (2004). Introduction to control. Department of Automatic Control, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hirsch, R. (2008). EDUMECH - Mechatronic Instructional Systems - Ball on Beam System. Shandor Motion Systems. Retrieved July 01, 2021, from https://cutt.ly/KUogfV1.

  43. Shahian, B., & Hassul, M. (1993). Control system design using MATLAB®. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Acharya, M., Bhattarai, M., & Poudel, B. (2014). Real time motion assessment for positioning in time and space critical systems. International Journal of Applied Research and Studies (iJARS), 3(7), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bolivar-Vincenty, C. G., & Beauchamp-Báez, G. (2014). Modelling the ball-and-beam system from Newtonian mechanics and from Lagrange methods. In Twelfth LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Enginering and Technology, Guayaquil, Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wellstead, P. E., Chrimes, V., Fletcher, P. R., Moody, R., & Robins, A. J. (1989). Ball and beam control experiment. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 15, 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Beard, R. W., McLain, T. W., Peterson, C., & Killpack, M. (2017). Introduction to feedback control using design studies. Chicago: Independently Published.

    Google Scholar 

  48. d\(^{\prime }\)Andréa-Novel, B., & De Lara, M. (2013). Control theory for engineers. A primer. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Aracil, J., & Gordillo, F. (2005). The inverted pendulum: A challenge for nonlinear control. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática Industrial, 2(2), 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Antsaklis, P. J., & Michel, A. N. (2006). Linear systems. Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Antsaklis, P. J., & Michel, A. N. (2007). A linear systems primer. Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Braslavsky, J. H. (2001). Control automático 2: Notas de clase (Automatic control 2: Lecture notes). Technical report, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Dodds, S. J. (2015). Feedback control. Linear, nonlinear and robust techniques and design with industrial applications. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Haidekker, M. A. (2013). Linear feedback controls: The essentials. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Levine, W. S. (Ed.). (2011). The control handbook. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. de Silva, C. W. (2009). Modeling and control of enginnering systems. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Boulet, B. (2006). Fundamentals of signals & systems. Charles River Media, An imprint of Thomson Learning Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hallauer, W. L. Jr. (2016). Introduction to linear, time-invariant, dynamic systems for students of engineering. Creative Commons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramon Costa-Castelló .

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (zip 8141 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Guzmán, J.L., Costa-Castelló, R., Berenguel, M., Dormido, S. (2023). From Nonlinear Physical Models to Linear Models. In: Automatic Control with Interactive Tools. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09920-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics