Skip to main content

Lessons Learned from Co-governance Approaches – Developing Effective AI Policy in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The 2021 Yearbook of the Digital Ethics Lab

Part of the book series: Digital Ethics Lab Yearbook ((DELY))

Abstract

Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are moving faster than the State’s ability to fully govern it, resulting in a need for innovative approaches that also involve non-state actors, or “co-governance” mechanisms. But the question remains as to exactly how co-governance mechanisms can be incorporated into AI governance in the EU. While governing the use of AI presents certain challenges to traditional modes of governance, these challenges are not unique to AI. This chapter provides an in-depth case study of co-governance mechanisms used in relation to services and supply chains that have similar governance challenges to AI in order to map a spectrum of co-governance mechanisms that may be useful for governing AI. After analyzing the applicability of various co-governance mechanisms to the AI governing space, the chapter offers recommendations for how and where these approaches may be most worthwhile. Effective AI governance will require a combination of approaches. Key to success will be State support, cooperation or buy-in in order to maintain legitimacy, while capitalizing upon non-state capacity and distributed implementation. Specifically, first, States, educational institutions and companies should make a major push to integrate responsible AI practices in education curriculums, setting the foundation for effective accreditation and professionalization mechanisms that employers recognize and value. Second, for lower-risk applications, EU Governments should support or compliment multi-stakeholder initiatives to assess and label products. Finally, for higher-risk AI systems, legislative points of control that include the use of co-governance mechanisms for implementation should be put in place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the EU context, co-regulation has been defined as a ‘mechanism whereby an [EU] legislative act entrusts the attainment of the objectives defined by the legislative authority to parties which are recognized in the field (such as economic operators, the social partners, non-governmental organizations, or associations)’ (2003 Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making, (n 43) para 18.) (Finck, 2017).

  2. 2.

    This includes minerals (mainly tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold) that were mined using child labor, or where the revenue from that mining funds war and unrest.

  3. 3.

    The most prominent examples being the U.S. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd Frank) – Section 1502 and the upcoming EU Conflict Minerals Regulation – 2021(European Commission, n.d.; Global Witness, 2017).

  4. 4.

    It represents 82 countries and 99.8% of the rough diamond market (The Kimberley Process, n.d.).

  5. 5.

    Founded in 1993 by the WWF, environmental NGOs, timber traders, indigenous peoples’ groups and forest worker organizations, the FSC sets standards for members and is comprised of environmental, social and economic chambers that balance and represent interests of the various stakeholders (Auld et al., 2008; FSC International, 2020).

  6. 6.

    For example, State-run Approbation in Germany for professions from physicians, to veterinarians, to pharmacists (Regierung von Oberbayern, 2021) or independently run General Medical Council in the UK (General Medical Council, 2021).

  7. 7.

    The medical profession for instance, something we now automatically consider as highly governed throughout Europe, existed for centuries without proper oversight. Only in the mid-nineteenth century did medical professionals and educational institutions begin to institutionalize membership and set common training/education and practice standards (Waddington, 1990).

  8. 8.

    This could also be considered in the ever increasing amount of computer science oriented classes in secondary schools.

  9. 9.

    As the examples above displayed, State support for mechanism improves their legitimacy and, therefore, effectiveness. Thus, getting State buy-in to support higher-education requirements is key.

  10. 10.

    Or what the proposed EU regulation terms “non-high-risk”(Artificial Intelligence Act, 2021, pp. 8, 10), for which they suggests building independent codes of conduct.

  11. 11.

    According to the EU proposed regulation, “this requires keeping records and the availability of a technical documentation, containing information which is necessary to assess the compliance of the AI system with the relevant requirements. Such information should include the general characteristics, capabilities and limitations of the system, algorithms, data, training, testing and validation processes used as well as documentation on the relevant risk management system. The technical documentation should be kept up to date” (Artificial Intelligence Act, 2021, p. 31)

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caitlin C. Corrigan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Corrigan, C.C. (2022). Lessons Learned from Co-governance Approaches – Developing Effective AI Policy in Europe. In: Mökander, J., Ziosi, M. (eds) The 2021 Yearbook of the Digital Ethics Lab. Digital Ethics Lab Yearbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09846-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics