Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vascular Graft Infection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
FDG-PET/CT and PET/MR in Cardiovascular Diseases

  • 303 Accesses

Abstract

Vascular graft infection is a severe and life-threatening complication. The pathogenesis, causative microorganisms, and clinical manifestations vary according to the graft’s location and time since surgery. The diagnosis of graft infection is challenging as there is no single “gold standard” test, and diagnosis is based on clinical and radiological criteria. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the standard imaging modality for the diagnosis of infection but has a low overall pooled sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 63%. PET/CT with FDG shows better diagnostic performance with sensitivity and specificity of 94–96% and 74–80%, respectively. While similar accuracy was found using white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy, it has several disadvantages when compared to FDG PET/CT in diagnosing graft infection. PET/CT interpretation criteria can affect its performance, with the graft uptake pattern found as the most accurate. Further investigation is required to understand the role of FDG PET/CT in monitoring response to antibiotic therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gharamti A, Kanafani ZA. Vascular graft infections: an update. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2018;32(4):789–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grabenwoger M, Alfonso F, Bachet J, Bonser R, Czerny M, Eggebrecht H, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for the treatment of aortic diseases: a position statement from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Assoc. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(13):1558–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buja LM, Schoen FJ. The pathology of cardiovascular interventions and devices for coronary artery disease, vascular disease, heart failure, and arrhythmias. In: Cardiovascular pathology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2016. p. 577–610.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson WR, Bower TC, Creager MA, Amin-Hanjani S, O’Gara PT, Lockhart PB, et al. Vascular graft infections, mycotic aneurysms, and endovascular infections: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134(20):e412–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lyons OTA, Baguneid M, Barwick TD, Bell RE, Foster N, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, et al. Diagnosis of aortic graft infection: a case definition by the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;52(6):758–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leroy O, Meybeck A, Sarraz-Bournet B, D’Elia P, Legout L. Vascular graft infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25(2):154–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lauri C, Iezzi R, Rossi M, Tinelli G, Sica S, Signore A, et al. Imaging modalities for the diagnosis of vascular graft infections: a consensus paper amongst different specialists. J Clin Med. 2020;9(5):1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vicaretti M. Pathophysiology of vascular graft infections. In: Mechanisms of vascular disease: a reference book for vascular specialists. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press; 2011. p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chakfé N, Diener H, Lejay A, Assadian O, Berard X, Caillon J, et al. Editor’s choice—European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 clinical practice guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(3):339–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coselli JS, Köksoy C, LeMaire SA. Management of thoracic aortic graft infections. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67(6):1990–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reinders Folmer EI, Von Meijenfeldt GCI, Van der Laan MJ, Glaudemans AWJM, Slart RHJA, Saleem BR, et al. Diagnostic imaging in vascular graft infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56(5):719–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Signore A, Jamar F, Israel O, Buscombe J, Martin-Comin J, Lazzeri E. Clinical indications, image acquisition and data interpretation for white blood cells and anti-granulocyte monoclonal antibody scintigraphy: an EANM procedural guideline. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(10):1816–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Puges M, Bérard X, Ruiz J-B, Debordeaux F, Desclaux A, Stecken L, et al. Retrospective study comparing WBC scan and 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected prosthetic vascular graft infection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(6):876–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mochizuki T, Tsukamoto E, Kuge Y, Kanegae K, Zhao S, Hikosaka K, et al. FDG uptake and glucose transporter subtype expressions in experimental tumor and inflammation models. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(10):1551–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rojoa D, Kontopodis N, Antoniou SA, Ioannou CV, Antoniou GA. 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of vascular prosthetic graft infection: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(2):292–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim S-J, Lee S-W, Jeong SY, Pak K, Kim K. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detection of infected prosthetic vascular grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(1):307–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khaja MS, Sildiroglu O, Hagspiel K, Rehm PK, Cherry KJ, Turba UC. Prosthetic vascular graft infection imaging. Clin Imaging. 2013;37(2):239–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guenther SPW, Cyran CC, Rominger A, Saam T, Kazmierzcak PM, Bagaev E, et al. The relevance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in diagnosing prosthetic graft infections post cardiac and proximal thoracic aortic surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;21(4):450–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dong W, Jinghong X, Linlin H, Xiaofen X, Mi H, Hacker M, et al. 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging for detection of infected thoracic aortic prosthetic grafts. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(supplement 1):1436.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lucinian YA, Lamarche Y, Demers P, Martineau P, Harel F, Pelletier-Galarneau M. FDG-PET/CT for the detection of infection following aortic root replacement surgery. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(6):1447–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jamar F, Buscombe J, Chiti A, Christian PE, Delbeke D, Donohoe KJ, et al. EANM/SNMMI guideline for 18F-FDG use in inflammation and infection. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(4):647–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bruggink JLM, Glaudemans AWJM, Saleem BR, Meerwaldt R, Alkefaji H, Prins TR, et al. Accuracy of FDG-PET–CT in the diagnostic work-up of vascular prosthetic graft infection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40(3):348–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Reinders Folmer EI, von Meijenfeldt GCI, Te Riet Ook Genaamd Scholten RS, van der Laan MJ, Glaudemans AWJM, Slart RHJA, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 18F-fluoro-d-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography interpretation methods in vascular graft and endograft infection. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(6):2174–2185.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saleem BR, Beukinga RJ, Boellaard R, Glaudemans AWJM, Reijnen MMPJ, Zeebregts CJ, et al. Textural features of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning in diagnosing aortic prosthetic graft infection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(5):886–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Einspieler I, Mergen V, Wendorff H, Haller B, Eiber M, Schwaiger M, et al. Diagnostic performance of quantitative and qualitative parameters for the diagnosis of aortic graft infection using [18F]-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020;28(5):2220–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Keidar Z, Engel A, Hoffman A, Israel O, Nitecki S. Prosthetic vascular graft infection: the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(8):1230–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sah B-R, Husmann L, Mayer D, Scherrer A, Rancic Z, Puippe G, et al. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in vascular graft infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(4):455–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Keidar Z, Pirmisashvili N, Leiderman M, Nitecki S, Israel O. 18F-FDG uptake in noninfected prosthetic vascular grafts: incidence, patterns, and changes over time. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(3):392–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wasselius J, Malmstedt J, Kalin B, Larsson S, Sundin A, Hedin U, et al. High 18F-FDG uptake in synthetic aortic vascular grafts on PET/CT in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(10):1601–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bowles H, Ambrosioni J, Mestres G, Hernández-Meneses M, Sánchez N, Llopis J, et al. Diagnostic yield of 18F-FDG PET/CT in suspected diagnosis of vascular graft infection: a prospective cohort study. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020;27(1):294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Spacek M, Belohlavek O, Votrubova J, Sebesta P, Stadler P. Diagnostics of “non-acute” vascular prosthesis infection using 18F-FDG PET/CT: our experience with 96 prostheses. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36(5):850–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schouten L. Surgical glue for repair of the aortic root as a possible explanation for increased F-18 FDG uptake. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15(1):146–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kagna O, Kurash M, Ghanem-Zoubi N, Keidar Z, Israel O. Does antibiotic treatment affect the diagnostic accuracy of 18 F-FDG PET/CT studies in patients with suspected infectious processes? J Nucl Med. 2017;58(11):1827–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rabkin Z, Israel O, Keidar Z. Do hyperglycemia and diabetes affect the incidence of false-negative 18F-FDG PET/CT studies in patients evaluated for infection or inflammation and cancer? A comparative analysis. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(7):1015–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Husmann L, Ledergerber B, Anagnostopoulos A, Stolzmann P, Sah B-R, Burger IA, et al. The role of FDG PET/CT in therapy control of aortic graft infection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(11):1987–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Galilee Medical Center, Naharia, Israel

    Elite Arnon-Sheleg

  2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Galilee Medical Center, Naharia, Israel

    Elite Arnon-Sheleg

  3. Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel

    Elite Arnon-Sheleg

  4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Technion—The Israeli institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

    Zohar Keidar

Authors
  1. Elite Arnon-Sheleg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zohar Keidar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elite Arnon-Sheleg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada

    Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau

  2. BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Patrick Martineau

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arnon-Sheleg, E., Keidar, Z. (2022). Vascular Graft Infection. In: Pelletier-Galarneau, M., Martineau, P. (eds) FDG-PET/CT and PET/MR in Cardiovascular Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09807-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09807-9_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09806-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09807-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation