Abstract
This chapter reviews the radiation physics principles underlying PET Imaging. Radiation detectors and PET detector systems are discussed. In addition, image reconstruction and image correction are presented, with emphasis on cardiac PET imaging.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Derenzo SE, Budinger TF, Huesman RH, Cahoon JL, Vuletich T. Imaging properties of a positron tomograph with 280 Bgo crystals. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1981;28(1):81–9.
Jones T, Townsend D. History and future technical innovation in positron emission tomography. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017;4(1):011013.
Dirac PAM, Fowler RH. A theory of electrons and protons. Proc R Soc Lond Ser Contain Pap Math Phys Character. 1930;126(801):360–5.
Anderson CD. The positive electron. Phys Rev. 1933;43(6):491–4.
Cattin P, Harders M, Hug J, Sierra R, Szekely G. Computer-supported segmentation of radiological data. In: Suri JS, Wilson DL, Laxminarayan S, editors. Handbook of biomedical image analysis. Segmentation models part B, vol. 2. Boston, MA: Springer US. p. 753–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48606-7_14.
Zanzonico P. Positron emission tomography: a review of basic principles, scanner design and performance, and current systems. Semin Nucl Med. 2004;34(2):87–111.
Anderson CJ, Ferdani R. Copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging of cancer: advances in preclinical and clinical research. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2009;24(4):379–93.
Fujibayashi Y, Matsumoto K, Yonekura Y, Konishi J, Yokoyama A. A new zinc-62/copper-62 generator as a copper-62 source for PET radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med. 1989;30(11):1838–42.
Zweit J, Goodall R, Cox M, Babich JW, Potter GA, Sharma HL, et al. Development of a high performance zinc-62/copper-62 radionuclide generator for positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1992;19(6):418–25.
Jødal L, Le Loirec C, Champion C. Positron range in PET imaging: non-conventional isotopes. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59(23):7419–34.
Jødal L, Le Loirec C, Champion C. Positron range in PET imaging: an alternative approach for assessing and correcting the blurring. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(12):3931–43.
Conti M, Eriksson L. Physics of pure and non-pure positron emitters for PET: a review and a discussion. EJNMMI Phys. 2016;3(1):8.
Derenzo SE, Budinger TF. Resolution limit for positron-imaging devices. J Nucl Med. 1977;18(5):491.
Nakazato R, Berman DS, Alexanderson E, Slomka P. Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET. Imaging Med. 2013;5(1):35–46.
Balsara RD, Chapman SE, Sander IM, Donahue DL, Liepert L, Castellino FJ, et al. Non-invasive imaging and analysis of cerebral ischemia in living rats using positron emission tomography with 18F-FDG. J Vis Exp. 2014;94:51495.
Ramirez RA, Wong W-H, Kim S, Baghaei H, Li H, Wang Y, et al. A comparison of BGO, GSO, MLS, LGSO, LYSO and LSO scintillation materials for high-spatial-resolution animal PET detectors. In: IEEE nuclear science symposium conference record, vol. 2005; 2005. p. 2835–9.
Nikl M. Scintillation detectors for X-rays. Meas Sci Technol. 2006 Feb;10(17):R37.
Lecoq P. Scintillation detectors for charged particles and photons. In: Fabjan CW, Schopper H, editors. Particle physics reference library: volume 2: detectors for particles and radiation. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 45–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35318-6_3.
Melcher CL. Scintillation crystals for PET. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(6):1051–5.
Casey ME, Nutt R. A multicrystal two dimensional BGO detector system for positron emission tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1986;33(1):460–3.
Herman GT, Carvalho BM. Simultaneous fuzzy segmentation of medical images. In: Suri JS, Wilson DL, Laxminarayan S, editors. Handbook of biomedical image analysis. Segmentation models part B, vol. 2. Boston, MA: Springer; 2005. p. 661–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48606-7_12.
Roncali E, Cherry SR. Application of silicon photomultipliers to positron emission tomography. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;39(4):1358–77.
Marrocchesi PS, Bagliesi MG, Batkov K, Bigongiari G, Kim MY, Lomtadze T, et al. Active control of the gain of a 3 mm×3 mm silicon PhotoMultiplier. Nucl Instrum Meth Phys Res A. 2009;602:391–5.
Mirzoyan R, Laatiaoui M, Teshima M. Very high quantum efficiency PMTs with bialkali photo-cathode. Nucl Instrum Meth Phys Res Sect Accel Spectr Detect Assoc Equip. 2006;567(1):230–2.
Dam H, Vinke R, Dendooven D, Loehner H, Beekman F, Schaart D. A comprehensive model of the response of silicon photomultipliers. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans. 2010;57:2254–66.
Jha AK, van Dam HT, Kupinski MA, Clarkson E. Simulating silicon photomultiplier response to scintillation light. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2013;30(1):336–51.
Radon J. On the determination of functions from their integral values along certain manifolds. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1986;5(4):170–6.
Fahey FH. Data Acquisition in PET Imaging. J Nucl Med Technol. 2002;30(2):39–49.
Prince JL, Links J. Medical imaging signals and systems. 1st ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2005. p. 496.
Turkington TG. Introduction to PET instrumentation. J Nucl Med Technol. 2001;29(1):4–11.
Bettinardi V, Presotto L, Rapisarda E, Picchio M, Gianolli L, Gilardi MC. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690. Med Phys. 2011;38(10):5394–411.
Anna M, Oddbjørn K, Live S, Erik EP. Quantitative comparison of PET performance—Siemens Biograph mCT and mMR. EJNMMI Physics. Goa. 2016;3(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0142-7.
Kjærnes S, Birger ØL, Live A, Maria EA. Image quality and detectability in Siemens Biograph PET/MRI and PET/CT systems—a phantom study. EJNMMI Physics. Karlberg. 2019;6(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-019-0251-1.
Ollinger JM. Model-based scatter correction for fully 3D PET. Phys Med Biol. 1996;41(1):153–76.
Watson CC, Newport D, Casey ME. A single scatter simulation technique for scatter correction in 3D PET. In: Grangeat P, Amans J-L, editors. Three-dimensional image reconstruction in radiology and nuclear medicine. Dordrecht: Springer; 1996. p. 255–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8749-5_18.
Moncayo VM, Garcia EV. Prompt-gamma compensation in Rb-82 myocardial perfusion 3D PET/CT: effect on clinical practice. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;25(2):606–8.
Positron Emission Tomography. Clinical practice. Radiology. 2007;244(2):380.
Moszynski M, Kapusta M, Wolski D, Szawlowski M, Klamra W. Energy resolution of scintillation detectors readout with large area avalanche photodiodes and photomultipliers. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1998;45(3):472–7.
ter Weele DN, Schaart DR, Dorenbos P. Scintillation detector timing resolution; a study by ray tracing software. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2015;62(5):1972–80.
Count rate lost model for D690. GE; 2015.
Ostertag H, Kübler WK, Doll J, Lorenz WJ. Measured attenuation correction methods. Eur J Nucl Med. 1989;15(11):722–6.
Kinahan PE, Townsend DW, Beyer T, Sashin D. Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys. 1998;25(10):2046–53.
Bracewell RN. Strip integration in radio astronomy. Aust J Phys. 1956;9:198.
Scudder HJ. Introduction to computer aided tomography. Proc IEEE. 1978;66(6):628–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hunter, C.R.R.N., deKemp, R.A. (2022). Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography Basics. In: Pelletier-Galarneau, M., Martineau, P. (eds) FDG-PET/CT and PET/MR in Cardiovascular Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09807-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09807-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09806-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09807-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)