Abstract
Given that clinical practice modification is based on outcome studies, the ability to evaluate and quantify the effects of treatment in anterior knee pain (AKP) patients is vital. Due to the limitations of the current methods like the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and functional scores such as the Kujala score and IKDC, new technologies are needed to measure the benefits of AKP treatment and to compare different methods of treatment. The final objective should be measurement during dynamic activities that cause or aggravate the symptoms. This objective might be achievable by means of kinetic and kinematic analysis given that both are useful in the objective measurement of lower limb function.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Motion analysis. Interpretation of computerized data that documents an individual’s lower and upper extremities, pelvis, trunk, and head motion during ambulation.
- 2.
Passive markers. Joint and segment markers used during motion analysis that reflect visible or infrared light in contrast with active markers that emit a signal.
- 3.
The forces are measured in N and they have been normalized for subject weight; therefore, it is a dimensionless magnitude.
- 4.
The moment is measured in N·m, it has been normalized for subject weight and knee height; therefore, it is a dimensionless value.
- 5.
Coronal plane. The plane that divides the body or body segment into anterior and posterior parts.
- 6.
Sagittal plane. The plane that divides the body or body segment into the right and left parts.
- 7.
External moment. The load applied to the human body due to ground reaction forces, gravity and external forces.
- 8.
Internal joint moment. The net result of all the internal forces acting about the joint which include moments due to the muscles, ligaments, joint friction and structural constraints.
- 9.
Stance phase. Period of time when the foot is in contact with the first step.
- 10.
Shock absorption. The progressive damping of an applied force. Damping is a complex, generally nonlinear, phenomenon that exists whenever energy is dissipated.
References
Costigan PA, Deluzio KJ, Wyss UP. Knee and hip kinetics during normal stair climbing. Gait Post. 2002;16:31–7.
Woltring H. 3-d attitude representation: a standardization proposal. J Biomech. 1994;27:1399–414.
Page A, De Rosario H, Mata V, et al. Effect of marker cluster design on the accuracy of human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44:1113–9.
Fulkerson JP. Disorders of the patellofemoral joint. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
Kowalk DL, Duncan JA, Vaughan CL. Abduction-adduction moments at the knee during stair ascent and descent. J Biomech. 1996;29:383–8.
Grood ES, Noyes FR. Diagnosis of knee ligament injuries: biomechanical precepts. In: Feagin JA, editor. The crucial ligaments. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1988. pp 245–60.
Brechter JH, Powers ChM. Patellofemoral joint stress during stair ascent and descent in persons with and without patellofemoral joint. Gait Post. 2002;16:115–23.
Salsich GB, Brechter JH, Powers ChM. Lower extremity kinetics during stair ambulation in patients with and without patellofemoral joint. Clin Biomech. 2001;16:906–12.
Grenholm A, Stensdotter AK, Hager-Ross CH. Kinematic analyses during stair descent in young women with patellofemoral pain. Clin Biomech. 2009;24:88–94.
Powers CM, Landel R, Perry J. Timing and intensity of vastus muscle activity during functional activities in subjects with and without patellofemoral pain. Phys Ther. 1996;76:946–55.
Crossley KM, Cowan SM, Bennell KL, et al. Knee flexion during stair ambulation is altered in individuals with patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:267–74.
Greenwald AE, Bagley AM, France EP, et al. A biomechanical and clinical evaluation of a patellofemoral knee brace. Clin Orthop. 1996;324:187–95.
Crossley KM, Cowan SM, McConnell J, et al. Physical therapy improves knee flexion during stair ambulation in patellofemoral pain. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:176–83.
Powers CM, Perry J, Hsu A, et al. Are patellofemoral pain and quadriceps femori muscle torque associated with locomotor function? Phys Ther. 1997;77:1063–75.
Hinman RS, Crossley KM, McConnell J, et al. Does the application of tape influence quadriceps sensorimotor function in knee osteoarthritis? Rheumatology. 2004;43:331–6.
Näslund J, Odenbring S, Näslund UB, et al. Diffusely increased bone scintigraphic uptake in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:162–5.
Elahi S, Cahue S, Felson DT, et al. The association between varus-valgus alignment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:1874–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sanchis-Alfonso, V., Baydal-Bertomeu, J.M. (2023). Kinetic and Kinematic Analysis in Evaluating Anterior Knee Pain Patients. In: Sanchis-Alfonso, V. (eds) Anterior Knee Pain and Patellar Instability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09767-6_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09767-6_52
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09766-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09767-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)