Skip to main content

Galileo Among the Giants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collected Wisdom of the Early Modern Scholar

Part of the book series: Archimedes ((ARIM,volume 64))

Abstract

The second day of Galileo’s Discourses concerning Two New Sciences (1638) discusses size, shape, and scale. He argues that there are physical limits to the size and shape of an object, beyond which it must collapse of its own weight. In nature, an enormous giant – human or animal – would require bones that were so large and heavy that it would be crushed by their weight. Galileo illustrated two bones: one a normal human femur, the other three times longer and proportionately broader and thicker. Galileo did not choose either the example or the image by chance. Giants, particularly giant fossil bones, were a topic of discussion among the Academy of the Lynx (Lincei), and Galileo’s image resembles a giant bone found in the south of France 20 years earlier. This paper explores these discussions in the 1620s and 30s and Galileo’s continued communication with members of the Lincei.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an introduction to the literature, Galileo 1974, Introduction; see also Westfall 1971; Bertoloni Meli 2006; Raphael 2017. All translations below are mine unless otherwise indicated.

  2. 2.

    Galileo 1974, 124–28.

  3. 3.

    Gonzalez 2002.

  4. 4.

    Galileo 1974, 127.

  5. 5.

    Galileo 1974, 127–28.

  6. 6.

    Freedberg 2002; Godard 1996, 2005, 2009, 2011.

  7. 7.

    For an overview of recent work, with a focus on Britain and the eighteenth century, see Roos 2020.

  8. 8.

    Mayor 2011; the term was coined in Vitaliano 1968.

  9. 9.

    Raphael 2012, 2017.

  10. 10.

    Findlen and Marcus 2017; see also Westfall 1984.

  11. 11.

    Mason 2013.

  12. 12.

    Brockstieger 2018; his skeleton is in the Anatomy Museum in Marburg, Germany.

  13. 13.

    Annius 1498, Stephens 1989.

  14. 14.

    Mayor 2011.

  15. 15.

    Furrer et al. 2007.

  16. 16.

    Goropius 1569.

  17. 17.

    Rice 2017.

  18. 18.

    Paré 1982.

  19. 19.

    Daston and Park 1998, 14.

  20. 20.

    Paré 1982, 23–26.

  21. 21.

    Habicot 1613, 27.

  22. 22.

    Liceti 1634, part 2 pp. 92–93.

  23. 23.

    Aldrovandi 1642, 161–62.

  24. 24.

    Riolan 1626, 44–45; Siraisi 2007, 26–30.

  25. 25.

    Riolan 1613, Guerrini forthcoming.

  26. 26.

    Riolan 1613, 26–28.

  27. 27.

    Riolan 1613, 28; 1618, 110.

  28. 28.

    Aristotle 1957, 409b–410a.

  29. 29.

    Riolan 1618, 72–73.

  30. 30.

    Della Porta 1586.

  31. 31.

    Stelluti 1637a; Cheng 2012.

  32. 32.

    Riolan 1618, 86.

  33. 33.

    Ginsburg 1984; Blainville 1835.

  34. 34.

    Miller 2000; Gassendi 1657.

  35. 35.

    Miller 2015, chapter 9.

  36. 36.

    Rizza 1961; see for example, Peiresc to Barbarini, 5 December 1635, Cibrario 1825, 83–87.

  37. 37.

    Fumaroli 1992.

  38. 38.

    Cabinet de Peiresc (n.d.); Miller 2000, 2015.

  39. 39.

    On the characterization of Peiresc as primarily an antiquarian, see Miller 2000.

  40. 40.

    Daston 2012, 162–64.

  41. 41.

    Rizza 1961, 449.

  42. 42.

    Daston 2012.

  43. 43.

    Moser 2014.

  44. 44.

    Rizza 1961, 448.

  45. 45.

    See Peiresc (n.d.) MS M 815(838) (not foliated), “A Amiens,” ca. 1609, Bibliothèque Méjanes, Aix-en-Provence. These travel instructions, probably for his brother Valadez, include a list of contacts in England and the Low Countries, many of them Protestant. For an account of this manuscript, see https://anitaguerrini.com/2019/05/26/instructions-for-a-voyage-1609/

  46. 46.

    Peiresc 1888–1898, V:503n.

  47. 47.

    Menestrier to Peiresc, 26 July 1624, Peiresc 1888–1898, V:496.

  48. 48.

    Menestrier to Peiresc, 30 December 1624, Peiresc 1888–1898, V:498.

  49. 49.

    On early modern discussions of fossil origins, see especially Rudwick 1976, Rossi 1984, Poole 2010.

  50. 50.

    Gessner 1565, Rudwick 1976.

  51. 51.

    Godard 2005.

  52. 52.

    Freedberg 2002.

  53. 53.

    Freedberg 2002, 323.

  54. 54.

    Galileo 1623.

  55. 55.

    See Findlen et al. 2017 for reproductions of additional images.

  56. 56.

    Stelluti 1637b.

  57. 57.

    Freedberg 2002, 332–34.

  58. 58.

    Freedberg 2002, 152; Fournier 1996, 10.

  59. 59.

    Peiresc to Palamède, sieur de Valavez, 7 June 1622, Peiresc 1888–1898, VI: 28–30.

  60. 60.

    Godard 2005.

  61. 61.

    Peiresc to Menestrier, 29 June 1628, Peiresc 1888–1898, V:547–48.

  62. 62.

    Peiresc to Menestrier, 22 February 1629, Peiresc 1888–1898, V: 558–59.

  63. 63.

    Menestrier to Peiresc, 21 April 1629, Peiresc 1888–1898, V: 566; Peiresc to Menestrier, 25 April 1629, Lettres de Peiresc, V: 571–72.

  64. 64.

    Peiresc to Menestrier, 29 June 1628, Peiresc 1888–1898, V:547.

  65. 65.

    Roos 2020, 525.

  66. 66.

    For biographical details on d’Arcos, see Tamizey de Larroque 1888, Tolbert 2009.

  67. 67.

    D’Arcos to Honoré Aycard, 25 April 1630, Tamizey de Larroque 1888, 164–167.

  68. 68.

    Augustine 1984, 609–10.

  69. 69.

    D’Arcos to Aycard, 20 April 1630, Tamizey de Larroque 1888, 166.

  70. 70.

    D’Arcos to Aycard, 26 June 1630, Tamizey de Larroque 1888, 168.

  71. 71.

    D’Arcos to Peiresc, 15 March 1631, Tamizey de Larroque 1888, 168–69; Godard 2009.

  72. 72.

    Peiresc to Pierre Dupuy, 23 May 1631, Peiresc 1888–1898, II: 280–81. The sketch of the tooth is found in Dupuy (n.d.) MS 488, f. 171r, Bibliothèque nationale de France.

  73. 73.

    Peiresc to Pierre Dupuy, 26 December 1631, Peiresc 1888–1898, II: 293-94; Peiresc to Cassiano dal Pozzo, 2 August 1635, Peiresc 1989, 195–202, at 198; Godard 2009; on Don Diego, Rice 2017.

  74. 74.

    Godard 2009.

  75. 75.

    Nivolet to Peiresc, 30 August 1634, MS 1821, (not foliated) Bibliothèque Imguimbertine, Carpentras. Transcript with annotations, Tamizey de Larroque 1888a.

  76. 76.

    Peiresc to Nivolet, 18 September 1634, MS 1821, (not foliated) Bibliothèque Imguimbertine, Carpentras.

  77. 77.

    Peiresc to Menestrier, 1 February 1635, Peiresc 1888–1898, V: 756–59; Peiresc to Cassiano dal Pozzo, 2 August 1635, Peiresc 1989, 195–202. He also asked Cassiano about a skeleton found in Rome.

  78. 78.

    Stephens 1989, 157–58.

  79. 79.

    Peiresc to Bourdelot, 22 March 1635, Peiresc 1888–1898, VII: 726-29; Peiresc to Holstenius, 7 May 1637, Lettres de Peiresc, V: 476–82, at 477.

  80. 80.

    Kircher 1665, vol. 2: 56.

  81. 81.

    Peiresc to Galileo, 1 April 1635, Favaro 1890–1909, vol. XVI, 245–48.

  82. 82.

    Peiresc to Galileo, 17 April 1635, Favaro 1890–1909, vol. XVI, 259–62; Peiresc to Menestrier, 1 February 1635, Peiresc 1888–1898, V: 756–59, at 757. The notion of a “petrifying juice” was well known in alchemy: see Alfonso-Goldfarb and Ferraz, 2013.

  83. 83.

    Galileo 1974, xiii.

  84. 84.

    Galileo 1974, 128.

  85. 85.

    Egmond and Mason 1997, 31–33.

  86. 86.

    Rondelet 1554, 475–82.

  87. 87.

    Galileo 1974, 128–29.

  88. 88.

    Galileo 1974, 129. See Westfall 1971, 14–15 for a succinct account of Galileo’s explanation of specific gravity.

  89. 89.

    Johnson et al., 2009.

References

Primary Sources

  • Aldrovandi, Ulisse. 1642. Monstrorum historia. Bologna: Niccolo Tebaldini.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annius of Viterbo. 1498. Commentaria super opera diversorum auctorum de antiquitatibus loquentium. Rome: Eucharius Silber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1957. On the Soul. Parva naturalia. On Breath. Trans. W.S. Hett. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine. 1984. City of God. Trans. Henry Bettenson. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blainville, Henri Ducrotay de. 1835. Éclaircissemens sur les ossemens fossiles attribués au pretendu géant, le roi Theutobochus, et reconnus pour appartenir au genre mastodonte. Parts 1 & 2. L’Echo du Monde Savant, 52 (27 mars), 234–35; 55 (3 avril), 237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet de Peiresc. (n.d.) https://curiositas.org/cabinet/curios1156

  • Cibrario, Luigi, ed. 1825. Lettere inedite di principi e d’uomini illustri. Turin: L’Alliana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine and Park, Katharine. 1998. Wonders and the Order of Nature 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, Giovanni Battista. 1586. De humana physiognomonia. Vico Equense: Giuseppe Cacchi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy (n.d.) MS 488. Bibliothèque nationale, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favaro, Antonio, et al., eds. 1890–1909. Opere di Galileo, 20 vol. in 21. Florence: G. Barbèra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo. 1623. Il saggiatore. Rome: Giacomo Mascardi. Trans. Stillman Drake 1957 as The Assayer (abridged) in Drake, ed., Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, 229–280. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo. 1974. Two New Sciences including Centers of Gravity and Force of Percussion. Trans. Stillman Drake. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Original edition, 1638. Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno à due nuove scienze. Leiden: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassendi, Pierre. 1657. The Mirrour of True Nobility and Gentility. Being the Life of the Renowned Nicolaus Claudius Fabricius Lord of Peiresk. Trans. W. Rand. London: J. Streater.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gessner, Conrad. 1565. De omnium rerum fossilium genere. Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goropius Becanus, Joannes. 1569. Origines Antwerpianae. Antwerp: Christophe Plantin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habicot, Nicolas. 1613. Gygantostéologie, ou, Discours des os d’un géant. Paris: Jean Houzé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kircher, Athanasius. 1665. Mundus subterraneus. Amsterdam: Joannes Janssonius & Elizeus Weyerstraten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liceti, Fortunio. 1634. De monstrorum caussis, natura, et differentiis. Padua: Paolo Frambotto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paré, Ambroise. 1982. On Monsters and Marvels. Trans. and ed. Janis Pallister. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiresc MS 1821. (n.d.) Bibliothèque Inguimbertine, Carpentras, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiresc MS M 815 (838). (n.d.) Bibliothèque Méjanes, Aix-en-Provence, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiresc, Nicolas-Claude Fabri de. 1888–1898. Lettres de Peiresc. 7 vol. Ed. Philippe Tamizey de Larroque. Paris: Imprimerie nationale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiresc, Nicolas-Claude Fabri de. 1989. Lettres à Cassiano dal Pozzo: 1626-1637. Ed. Jean-François Lhote and Danielle Joyal. Clermont-Ferrand: Adosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riolan, Jean. 1613. Gigantomachie pour respondre a la Gigantosteologie. [Paris]: NP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riolan, Jean. 1618. Gigantologie. Paris: Adrian Perier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riolan, Jean. 1626. Anthropographia. Frankfurt [am Main]: Officina Bryanae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondelet, Guillaume. 1554. Libri de piscibus marinis. Lyon: Mathieu Bonhomme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelluti, Francesco. 1637a. Della fisionomia di tutto il corpo humano del s. Gio. Batta Della Porta … in tavole sinottiche ridotto. Rome: Vitale Mascardi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelluti, Francesco. 1637b. Trattato del legno fossile minerale nuovamente scoperto. Rome: Vitale Mascardi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamizey de Larroque, Philippe, ed. 1888. Lettres inédites de Thomas d’Arcos à Peiresc. Revue Africaine, 32, no. 189 (mai 1888):161–195; no. 190 (3rd trimestre 1888), 289–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamizey de Larroque, Philippe, ed. 1888a. Un document inédit sur la Géant Theutobochus. Bulletin du bibliophile, 309–313.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Alfonso-Goldfarb, Ana Maria and Ferraz, Marcia H.M. 2013. Gur, Ghur, Guhr or Bur? The quest for a metalliferous prime matter in early modern times. British Journal for the History of Science, 46: 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2006. Thinking with Objects. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockstieger, Sylvia. 2018. Sprachpatriotismus und Wettstreit der Künste. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Sandra. 2012. The Cult of the monstrous: caricature, physiognomy, and monsters in Early Modern Italy. Preternature, 1: 197–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine. 2012. The Sciences of the archive. Osiris, 27: 156–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egmond, Florike and Mason, Peter. 1997. The Mammoth and the Mouse. Microhistory and Morphology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlen, Paula and Marcus, Hannah. 2017. The breakdown of Galileo’s Roman network: Crisis and community, ca. 1633. Social Studies of Science, 47: 326–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlen, Paula; MacGregor, Arthur, et al., eds. 2017. Birds, Other Animals and Natural Curiosities (Paper Museum of Cassiano Dal Pozzo. Series B: Natural History). London: Harvey Miller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, Marian. 1996. The Fabric of Life: Microscopy in the Seventeenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedberg, David. 2002. The Eye of the Lynx. Galileo, his Friends, and the Beginnings of Modern Natural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumaroli, Marc. 1992. Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc, Prince de la République des Lettres. Bruxelles: Association Pro-Peyresq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furrer, Heinz; Graf, Hans Rudolf; and Mäder, Andreas. 2007. The mammoth site of Niederweningen, Switzerland. Quaternary International, 164–65: 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, Léonard. 1984. Nouvelles lumières sur les ossements autrefois attribués au géant Theutobochus, Annales de Paléontologie, 70 (3) : 181–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard, Gaston. 1996. Peiresc, Gassendi, Menestrier, La Ferrière, Gilles de Loches... : Un cercle méconnu de ”géologues” au début du dix-septième siècle. Travaux du Comité français d’Histoire de la Géologie, Comité français d’Histoire de la Géologie, 1996, 3ème série, 10:155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard, Gaston. 2005. Peiresc et la proto-géologie du début du XVIIe siècle. Sciences et techniques en perspective, 2ème série, 9:63–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard, Gaston. 2009. The fossil proboscideans of Utica (Tunisia), a key to the ‘giant’ controversy, from Saint Augustine (424) to Peiresc (1632). Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 310: 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard, Gaston. 2011. Les travaux géologiques de la première Accademia dei Lincei (1603-1651). Travaux du Comité français d’Histoire de la Géologie, Comité français d’Histoire de la Géologie, 3ème série, 25 (5): 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, José Luis. 2002. The Square Cube Law: from Vitruvius to Gaudi. Raziones Gaudi, 2: 1323–1340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrini, Anita. Forthcoming. Peiresc, Riolan, and the Library as Laboratory. To appear in “The constitution of the scientific observation site between the Renaissance and the Modern Age. Ideal, real and institutional sites,” special issue of Nuncius, ed. Dalia Deias.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C., Evill R., Wilson M., Rolfe S. 2009. Going Ape. The Galilean Square-cube law in motion pictures. Journal of Physics Special Topics (University of Leicester) A2_5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Peter. 2013. The Colossal. From Ancient Greece to Giacometti. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayor, Adrienne. 2011. The First Fossil Hunters. Reissue with new introduction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Peter N. 2000. Peiresc’s Europe. Learning and Virtue in the Seventeenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Peter N. 2015. Peiresc’s Mediterranean World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, Stephanie. 2014. Making expert knowledge through the image: Connections between antiquarian and Early Modern scientific illustration. Isis 105: 58–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, William. 2010. The World Makers: Scientists of the Restoration and the Search for the Origins of the Earth. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, Renée. 2012. Printing Galileo’s Discorsi: A collaborative affair. Annals of Science, 69: 483–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, Renée. 2017. Reading Galileo: Scribal Technologies and the Two New Sciences. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Louise. 2017. Poussin’s Elephant. Renaissance Quarterly 70: 548–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizza, Cecilia. 1961. Galileo nella corrispondenza di Peiresc. Studi francesi, 15: 433–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, Anna Marie. 2020. Afterword: Dismiss the Antiquary at your Peril. Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 43: 525–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Paolo. 1984. The Dark Abyss of Time. Trans. Lydia G. Cochrane. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, Martin. 1976. The Meaning of Fossils. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraisi, Nancy. 2007. History, Medicine, and the Traditions of Renaissance Learning. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, Walter. 1989. Giants in Those Days. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, Jane. 2009. Ambiguity and conversion in the correspondence of Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc and Thomas d’Arcos, 1630-1637. Journal of Early Modern History, 13: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitaliano, Dorothy B. 1968. Geomythology: The impact of geologic events on history and legend with special reference to Atlantis. Journal of the Folklore Institute, 5: 5-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, Richard S. 1971. Force in Newton’s Physics. London: Macdonald/New York: American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, Richard S. 1984. Galileo and the Accademia dei Lincei. In Novità celesti e crisi del. Sapere: Atti del Convegno internazionale di studi Galileiani (Pisa-Venezia-Padova-Firenze), ed. Paolo Galuzzi, 189–200. Florence: Giunti Barbera.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita Guerrini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Guerrini, A. (2023). Galileo Among the Giants. In: Roos, A.M., Manning, G. (eds) Collected Wisdom of the Early Modern Scholar. Archimedes, vol 64. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09722-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09722-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09721-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09722-5

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics