Abstract
TOPSIS is one of the more popular multiple criteria modeling method in academia. (Salih et al., Comput. Oper. Res. 104:207–227, 2019) reported detailed statistics on the number of TOPSIS journal articles published. We have roughly done an update looking at scholarly publications on EBSCO, for all time periods in their system as well as 2018 to 2021.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aҁikgöz, T.: Investigation of cash flow profiles of manufacturing sector and comparison of financial performances with TOPSIS method. J. Account. Finance 90, 127–147 (2021). https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.837360
Ban, A.I., Ban, O.I., Bogdan, V., Sabau Popa, D.C., Tuse, D.: Performance evaluation model of Romanian manufacturing companies by fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 26(4), 806–836 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.12367
Ҁalik, A., Ҁizmecioğlu, S., Akpinar, A.: An integrated AHP-TOPSIS framework for foreign direct investment in Turkey. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 26(5/6), 296–307 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1692
Chen, J., Xu, Z., Gou, H.D., Zhang, J.: Automobile components procurement using a DEA-TOPSIS-FFMIP approach with all-unit quantity discount and fuzzy factors. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 27(2), 311–352 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.13176
Cui, L., Zhou, H., Kolivand, H., Balas, V.E., Paul, A., Ramachandran, V.: Spatial feature analysis of rural basic public service supply based on TOPSIS model and data aggregation algorithm. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 39(4), 5623–5634 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189042
Durak, I., Arslan, H.M., Őzdemir, Y.: Application of AHP-TOPSIS methods in technopark selection of technology companies: Turkish case. Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag. 1–15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1925242
Hejazinia, R.: Electronic service risk pattern and ranking by using fuzzy TOPSIS technique. Int. J. Manag. Account. Econ. 8(3), 143–155 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4698992
Jiang, D., Hasan, M.M., Faiz, T.I., Noor-E-Alam, M.: A possibility distribution-based multicriteria decision algorithm for resilient supplier selection problems. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 27(3/4), 203–223 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1696
Li, G.-F., Li, Y., Chen, C.-J., He, J.-L., Hou, T.-W., Chen, J.-H.: Advanced FMEA method based on interval 2-tuple linguistic variables and TOPSIS. Qual. Eng. 32(4), 653–662 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2019.1677913
Liu, C.-C., Niu, Z.-W., Chang, P.-C., Zhang, B.: Assessment approach to stage of lean transformation cycle based on fuzzy nearness degree and TOPSIS. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55(23), 7223–7235 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1355124
Mohammed, A.: Towards a sustainable assessment of suppliers: an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS-possibilistic multi-objective approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 293(2), 639–668 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03167-5
Otay, I., Jaller, M., Kahraman, C.: A novel pythagorean fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS method for the wind power farm location selection problem. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 39(5), 6193–6204 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189089
Ouyang, L.-Y., Chen, K.-S., Yang, C.-M., Hsu, C.-H.: Using a QCAC-entropy-TOPSIS approach to measure quality characteristics and rank improvement priorities for all substandard quality characteristics. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(10), 3110–3124 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.865092
Patil, A.N., Shiykumar, K.M., Manjunath Oatel, G.C., Jatti, S.P., Rivankar, S.N.: Fuzzy TOPSIS and grey relation analysis integration for supplier selection in fiber industry. Int. J. Supply Oper. Manag. 7(4), 373–383 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22034/IJSOM.2020.4.6.
Rehman, O.U., Ali, Y.: Optimality study of China’s crude oil imports through China Pakistan economic corridor using fuzzy TOPSIS and cost-benefit analysis. Transp. Res. Part E 148, 1–17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102246
Salih, M.M., Zaidan, B.B., Zaidan, A.A., Ahmed, M.A.: Survey on fuzzy TOPSIS state-of-the art between 2007 and 2017. Comput. Oper. Res. 104, 207–227 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.12.019
Song, Y., Li, X., Li, Y., Hong, X.: Assessing the risk of an investment project using an improved TOPSIS method. Appl. Econ. Lett. 27(16), 1334–1339 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2019.1679339
Stoyanets, N., Hu, Z., Chen, J., Niu, L.: Managing sustainability development of the agricultural sphere based on the entropy weight TOPSIS model. Int. J. Technol. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 19(3), 263–278 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd_00026_1
Vasilić, N., Semenċenko, D., Popović-Pantiċ, S.: Evaluating ICT usage in enterprises in Europe: TOPSIS approach. Econ. Themes 58(4), 529–544 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2020-0030
Wei, C.C., Chang, Y.-L., Lee, K.-L.: How to select suitable manufacturing information system outsourcing projects by using TOPSIS method. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57(13), 4333–4350 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1572930
Zhuang, Z.-Y., Su, C.-R., Chang, S.-C.: The effectiveness of IF-MADM (Intuitionistic-fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making) for group decisions: methods and an empirical assessment for the selection of a senior centre. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 25(2), 322–364 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.8399
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shih, HS. (2022). TOPSIS Applications. In: TOPSIS and its Extensions: A Distance-Based MCDM Approach. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 447. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09577-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09577-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09576-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09577-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)