Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Will This Time Be Different? Effects of Large-Scale Technological Change in Advanced Democracies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democracy under Pressure

Part of the book series: Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century ((CDC))

  • 244 Accesses

Abstract

Technologies such as artificial intelligence, virtual reality, robotics, the Internet of Things, 3D printing and cloud computing have the potential to bring far-reaching change to work, production and many aspects of human living. Indeed, these innovations already may have initiated a period of disruptive change in the world economy. It transpired during previous major epochs of technological change that robust democratic systems and complementary institutions to mitigate tensions and risks are particularly important during such periods. It follows that the pressures now experienced in many democracies are likely to hinder management of the effects of ongoing technological changes. Another complicating factor is that the effects of these changes and other economic developments seem to be aggravating the pressures on democratic systems. Hence, this chapter argues that effective management of these challenges requires attention to the resilience of democratic institutions as well as appropriate policy responses to disruptive effects of technological changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019a). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labour. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D. & Restrepo, P. (2019b). The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand. NBER Working Paper No. 25682. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labour markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188–2244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Lelarge, C., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Competing with robots: Firm-level evidence from France. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 110, 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail. Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anelli, M., Colantone I., and Stanig. P. (2019). We were the robots: Automation and voting behaviour in Western Europe. IZA Discussion Paper No. 12485. Bonn: Institute for Labour Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntz, M., Gregory, T. and Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 189. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2017). Revisiting the risks of automation. Economics Letters, 159, 157–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China syndrome: Local labour market effects of import competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121–2168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. H. & Salomons, A. (2018). Is automation labour-displacing? Productivity growth, employment, and the labour share. NBER Working Paper No. 24871. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, L., Mussida, C., Piva, M., and Vivarelli, M. (2019). Testing the employment impact of automation, robots and AI: A survey and some methodological issues. IZA Discussion Paper No. 12612. Bonn: Institute for Labour Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanas, S., Gancia, G., & Lee, S. Y. (2019). Who is afraid of machines? Economic Policy, 34(100), 627–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, J., Inklaar R., de Jong, H., and van Zanden, J. L. (2018). The Maddison project database (2018 version). Groningen: University of Groningen (Growth and Development Centre), www.rug.nl/ggdc/historicaldevelopment/maddison/data/mpd2018.xlsx (Last accessed 13 November 2019).

  • Bossert, W., Clark, A. E., D’Ambrosio, C., and Lepinteur, A. (2020). Economic insecurity and the rise of the right. ECINEQ Working Paper No. 520. Rome: ECINEQ—Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breemersch, K., Damijan, J. P., and Konings, J. (2017). Labour market polarisation in advanced countries: Impact of global value chains, Technology, import competition from China and labour market institutions. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 197. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2011). Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Digital Frontier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernoff, A. W. & Warman, C. (2020). COVID-19 and implications for automation. NBER Working Paper No. 27249. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiacchio, F., Petropoulos, G., and Pichler, D. (2018). The impact of industrial robots on EU employment and wages: A local labour market approach. Working Paper No. 25186. Brussels: Bruegel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. (2014). The Industrial revolution. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), The handbook of economic growth (pp. 217–262). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, M., & Borland, J. (2016). Job polarisation and earnings inequality in Australia. Economic Record, 92(296), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts, N. (2005). The first industrial revolution: Resolving the slow growth/rapid industrialisation Paradox. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2/3), 525–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts, N. (2010). The contribution of new technology to economic growth: Lessons from economic history. Revista De Historia Económica, 28(3), 409–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauth, W., Findeisen, S., Südekum, J., and Woessner, N. (2017). German robots—The impact of industrial robots on workers. IAB Discussion Paper 30/2017. Nuremburg: Institute for Employment Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, T. & Gold, R. (2019). What drives populist votes? Recent insights and open questions. Working Paper No. 1/2019. Berlin: Forum for a New Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, C. B. (2019). The technology trap: Capital, labour and power in the age of automation. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, C. B., Berger, T., & Chen, C. (2018). Political machinery: Did robots swing the 2016 US Presidential Election? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(3), 418–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich, J. (2019). Did state responses to automation matter for voters? Research and Politics, 6(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., Manning, A., & Salomons, A. (2014). Explaining job polarisation: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2509–2526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., & Manning, A. (2007). Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The rising polarisation of work in Britain. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 118–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. J. (2000). Does the ‘New Economy’ measure up to the great inventions of the past? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gozgor, G. (2020). The role of economic uncertainty in rising populism in the EU. CESifo Working Paper No. 8499. Munich: Centre for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graetz, G., & Michaels, G. (2018). Robots at work. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5), 753–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. A., & Sand, B. M. (2015). Has the Canadian labour market polarised? Canadian Journal of Economics, 48(2), 612–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Herrera, H., Morelli, M., and Sonno, T. (2017). Demand and supply of populism. EIEF Working Paper 17/03. Rome: Bank of Italy (Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance).

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, Z. J., Mayer, N., Palier, B., & Rovny, J. (2019). The ‘Losers of Automation’: A reservoir of votes for the radical right? Research and Politics, 6(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2017). Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: The silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics, 15(2), 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I., & Vollrath, D. (2013). An introduction to economic growth (3rd ed.). W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L. (2005). General Purpose Technologies. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), The handbook of economic growth (pp. 1181–1224). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justman, M., & Gradstein, M. (1999). The industrial revolution, political transition, and the subsequent decline in inequality in 19th-century Britain. Explorations in Economic History, 36(1), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L.F. & Margo, R.A. (2014). Technical change and the relative demand for skilled labour: The United States in historical perspective. In L.P. Boustan, C. Frydman and R.A. Margo (Eds.), Human Capital in History: The American Record. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 15–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenert, D., Fernández-Macías, E., and Antón, J. (2020). Do robots really destroy jobs? Evidence from Europe. JRC Working Papers series on labour, education and technology 2020/01. Seville: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutsen, C. Why democracies outgrow autocracies in the long run: Civil liberties, information flows and technological change. Kyklos, 68(3): 357–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, M., Manuylov, I., and Smolka, M. (2019). Robots and firms. CESifo Working Paper No. 7608. Munich: Centre for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kromann, L., & Sørensen, A. (2019). Automation, performance and international competition: A Firm-level comparison of process innovation. Economic Policy, 34(100), 691–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurer, T., & Palier, B. (2019). Shrinking and shouting: The political revolt of the declining middle in times of employment polarisation. Research and Politics, 6(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leduc, S. & Liu, Z. (2020). Can pandemic-induced job uncertainty stimulate automation? FRBSF Working Paper 2020–19. San Francisco: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (1982). Phases of capitalist development. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, Y. (2019). Economic insecurity and the causes of populism, reconsidered. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 152–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & (1844,. (1977). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Fifth (revised). Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. (2019). Max U Versus Humanomics: A critique of Neo-institutionalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (1992). Technological inertia in economic history. Journal of Economic History, 52(2), 325–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (2005). Long-term economic growth and the history of technology. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), The handbook of economic growth (pp. 1113–1180). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (2008). Technology. In N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new palgrave dictionary of economics (second edition) (pp. 217–223). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J., Vickers, C., & Ziebarth, N. L. (2015). The history of technology anxiety and the future of economic growth: Is this time different? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, B., & Valenzuela, L. (2019). Inequality and its discontents. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 35(3), 396–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nübler, I. (2016). New technologies: A jobless future or golden age of job creation? ILO research department Working Paper No. 13. Geneva: International Labour Office (Research Department).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberson, X. (2019). Taxing Robots: Helping the Economy to Adapt to the Use of Artificial Intelligence. Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pantea, S., Sabadash, A., & Biagi, F. (2017). Are ICT displacing workers in the short run? Evidence from seven european countries. Information Economics and Policy, 39, 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, C. (2010). Technological revolutions and Techno-economic Paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prados de la Escosura, L. (2019). Historical index of human development database. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (Department of Social Sciences). https://espacioinvestiga.org/home-hihd/hihd-downloads/?lang=en (Last accessed 13 November 2019).

  • Prettner, K., & Strulik, H. (2020). Innovation, automation, and inequality: Policy challenges in the race against the machine. Journal of Monetary Economics, 116, 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaub, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. The World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J. (2019). Narratives about technology-induced job degradations then and now. NBER Working Paper No. 25536. Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebrits, F. K. (2018). Globalisation and social protection: An economic perspective. In U. J. van Beek (Ed.), Democracy under threat: A Crisis of Legitimacy? (pp. 255–279). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776; 2000). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L. H. (2018). Secular stagnation and macroeconomic policy. IMF Economic Review, 66(2), 226–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szreter, S., & Mooney, G. (1998). Urbanisation, mortality, and the standard of living debate: New estimates of the expectation of life at birth in nineteenth-century British cities. Economic History Review, 51(1), 84–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V., & Schuknecht, L. (2000). Public spending in the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Reenen, J. (2011). Wage inequality, technology and trade: 21st century evidence. Labour Economics, 18(6), 730–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. G. (1984). Why was British growth so slow during the industrial revolution? The Journal of Economic History, 44(3), 687–712.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

    Krige Siebrits

Authors
  1. Krige Siebrits
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krige Siebrits .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

    Ursula van Beek

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Siebrits, K. (2022). Will This Time Be Different? Effects of Large-Scale Technological Change in Advanced Democracies . In: van Beek, U. (eds) Democracy under Pressure. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09123-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation