Skip to main content

Student or Human Operator? Objective Results and Subjective Perceptions of the Process and Results of Offline and Online Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cybernetics Perspectives in Systems (CSOC 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 503))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The article analyzes the different levels of students perceptions and attitudes and training areas to different learning formats: online and offline. The paper is the research a continuation conducted by the author since the pandemic beginning, reflecting the learners’ attitudes dynamics towards learning different aspects and distance learning in general. The study objects were a technical university different training areas students, have got learning experience of technical and humanities disciplines in different formats. The study subject were both objective indicators of different formats (grades comparison received during offline and online learning, and health status). The process subjective characteristics evaluation and learning results in different formats were also compared: satisfaction with the obtained educational results, the monotony, emotions state manifestation experienced when learning in different formats. In other words, the study compares objective and subjective characteristics of different formats: learning achievements and health preservation, satisfaction with the educational process and experienced emotional results. The empirical part is built on the empirical data analysis obtained through the questionnaire designed by the author. The hypotheses regarding the more positive attitude of students towards offline learning and the differences’ presence in attitude towards formats depending on which disciplines are emitted - technical or humanities are tested. The study results showed that the learners’ marks in the transition from offline to online format often increase or remain at the same level. However, subjectively, learners assess the learning process in the online format rather negatively, regardless of whether technical or humanities subjects are studied: the learning process pleasure decreases, monotony increases and satisfaction with the learning outcomes decreases. And this is despite the deteriorating health noted by the respondent’s majority. The conclusion is made about the learning process formalization in the transition to online, the transferring and changing personal meanings’ difficulty, the personal knowledge formation, which are the learning main criteria. It is noted that an important factor in the negative assessment of online learning are the differences in instrumental and technological readiness of participants in the educational process in the use of information and communication digital technologies. Lack of consideration of the impact of the design of the used learning tools on the process and the result of training also negatively affect the evaluation of online learning. It is pointed out the need to find a “formula” for blended learning and the learning technologies development - ICT and digital - up to the immersive reality creation, which will make the departure from offline to online learning the basis for effective learning, bringing satisfaction to all participants in the educational process. #CSOC1120.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vinogradova, V.V.: Problems and prospects of modern education in the development of digital technology. In: Proceedings of the V International Scientific-Practical Proceedings “Pedagogical Parallels”, pp. 114–120. Russia (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cherubini, L.: Exploring prospective teachers’ critical thinking: case-based pedagogy and the standards of professional practice. Teach. Teach. Educ. 25(2), 228–234 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dillon, P.: Creativity, integrative and pedagogy of connection. School Educ. Lifelong Learn. Thinking Skills Creativity 1(2), 69–83 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dzhangarov, A.I., Hanmurzaev, H.E., Potapova, N.V.: Digital education in the coronavirus era. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1691, 012133 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harri-Augstein, S., Thomas, L.: Self-organized learning and the relativity of knowing: towards a conversational methodology. In: Stringer, P., Bannister, D. (eds.) Constructs of Sociality and Individuality. Academic Press, London (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kvashko, L.P., Aleksandrova, L.G., Shesternina, V.V., Erdakova, L.D., Kvashko, V.V.: Distance learning during self-isolation: comparative analysis. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1691, 012013 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yarychev, N., Mentsiev, A.: New methods and ways of organizing the educational process in the context of digitalization. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1691, 012128 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lobanova, Y.: Distant learning experience reflection during the pandemic of Covid-19 (On the example of teaching in the technical university). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1691, 012152 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lobanova, Y.I.: Distance learning advantages and disadvantages: teaching experience analysis at the university with the basis on different informational-communicative technologies. In: Silhavy, R. (ed.) CSOC 2021. LNNS, vol. 229, pp. 499–506. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77445-5_46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Makarenya, T.A., Stash, S.V., Nikashina, P.O.: Modern educational technologies in the context of distance learning. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1691, 012117 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Orishev, A.B., Mamedov, A.A., Kotusov, D.V., Grigoriev, S.L., Makarova, E.V.: Digital education: Vkontakte social network as a means of organizing the educational process. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1691, 12092 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Polanyi, M.: Personal Knowledge. Progress, Moscow (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas, L.: Learning and meaning. In: Fransella, F. (ed.) Personal Construct Psychology 1977. Academic Press, London (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas, L.: Nothing more theoretical than good practice: teaching for self-organized learning. In: Issues and Approaches in Personal Construct Theory. In: Bannister, D. (ed.) Academic Press, London (1985)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. I. Lobanova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lobanova, Y.I. (2022). Student or Human Operator? Objective Results and Subjective Perceptions of the Process and Results of Offline and Online Learning. In: Silhavy, R. (eds) Cybernetics Perspectives in Systems. CSOC 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 503. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09073-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics