Skip to main content

Controlling the Quality of GAN-Based Generated Images for Predictions Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence (ICPRAI 2022)

Abstract

Recently, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have been widely applied for data augmentation given limited datasets. The state of the art is dominated by measures evaluating the quality of the generated images, that are typically all added to the training dataset. There is however no control of the generated data, in terms of the compromise between diversity and closeness to the original data, and this is our work’s focus. Our study concerns the prediction of soil moisture dissipation rates from synthetic aerial images using a CNN regressor. CNNs, however, require large datasets to successfully train them. To this end, we apply and compare two Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) models: (1) Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCGAN) and (2) Bidirectional Generative Adversarial Network (BiGAN), to generate fake images. We propose a novel approach that consists of studying which generated images to include into the augmented dataset. We consider a various number of images, selected for training according to their realistic character, based on the discriminator loss. The results show that, using our approach, the CNN trained on the augmented dataset generated by BiGAN and DCGAN allows a significant relative decrease of the Mean Absolute Error w.r.t the CNN trained on the original dataset. We believe that our approach can be generalized to any Generative Adversarial Network model.

The authors thank Campus France and Morocco CNRST for the financial support of this research, and Telecom SudParis, and Univ. Mohammed V during the different phases of this study. This work was also supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61976030 and the funds for creative research groups of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission under Grant CXQT21034.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Papadavid, G., Hadjimitsis, D., Fedra, K., Michaelides, S.: Smart management and irrigation demand monitoring in Cyprus, using remote sensing and water resources simulation and optimization. Adv. Geosci. 30, 31–37 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hassan-Esfahani, L., Torres-Rua, A., Jensen, A., Mckee, M.: Spatial root zone soil water content estimation in agricultural lands using Bayesian-based artificial neural networks and high resolution visual, NIR, and thermal imagery. Irrig. Drain. 66, 273–288 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jha, K., Doshi, A., Patel, P.: Intelligent irrigation system using artificial intelligence and machine learning: a comprehensive review. Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(10), 1493–1502 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abbas, A., Jain, S., Gour, M., Vankudothu, S.: Tomato plant disease detection using transfer learning with C-GAN synthetic images. Comput. Electron. Agric. 187, 106279 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Qin, H., El Yacoubi, M., Li, Y., Liu, C.: Multi-scale and multidirection GAN For CNN-based single palm-vein identification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 16, 2652–2666 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gu, S., Bao, J., Chen, D., Wen, F.: GIQA: generated image quality assessment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.08932 (2020)

  7. Borji, A.: Pros and cons of GAN evaluation measures. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. J. 179, 41–65 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu, X., et al.: GAN-Based Image Super-Resolution with a Novel Quality Loss. Mathematical Problems in Engineering (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jean-François, P., Rhita, N.: Limitations of the SSIM quality metric in the context of diagnostic imaging. In: International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2015, pp. 2960–2963. IEEE, Canada (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2015.7351345

  10. Kovalenko, B.: Super resolution with Generative Adversarial Networks (n.d.)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Borji, A.: Pros and cons of GAN evaluation measures: new developments (2021). http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.09396

  12. Shmelkov, K., Schmid, C., Alahari, K.: How good is my GAN? In: Ferrari, V., Hebert, M., Sminchisescu, C., Weiss, Y. (eds.) ECCV 2018. LNCS, vol. 11206, pp. 218–234. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01216-8_14

  13. Qin, Z., Liu, Z., Zhu, P., Xue, Y.: A GAN-based image synthesis method for skin lesion classification. Comput. Meth. Program. Biomed. 195, 0169–2607 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao, Z., Zhang, Z., Chen, T., Singh, S., Zhang, H.: Image augmentations for GAN training (2020). http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.02595

  15. Fawakherji, M., Ptena, C., Prevedello, I., Pretto, A., Bloisi, D.D., Nardi, D.: Data augmentation using GANs for crop/weed segmentation in precision farming. In: CCTA 2020 Conference, Montréal, pp. 279–284. IEEE Xplore (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCTA41146.2020.9206297

  16. Hammouch, H., El Yacoubi, M., Qin, H., Berrahou, A., Berbia, H., Chikhaoui, M.: A two-stage deep convolutional generative adversarial network-based data augmentation scheme for agriculture image regression tasks. In: International Conference on Cyber-physical Social Intelligence, CSI 2021, Beijing. IEEE Xplore (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M.: Generative adversarial networks. Commun. ACM 63(11), 139–144 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Donahue, J., Krähenbühl, P., Darrell, T.: Adversarial feature learning (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.09782

  19. Cui, L., Tian, X., Shi, X., Wang, X., Cui, Y.: A semi-supervised fault diagnosis method based on improved bidirectional generative adversarial network. Appl. Sci. 11(20), 9401 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11209401

  20. Tseng, D., et al.: Towards automating precision irrigation: deep learning to infer local soil moisture conditions from synthetic aerial agricultural images. In: CASE 2018 Conference, Munich, pp. 284–291. IEEE (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2018.8560431

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hajar Hammouch , Mounim El-Yacoubi , Hassan Berbia or Mohamed Chikhaoui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hammouch, H., El-Yacoubi, M., Qin, H., Berbia, H., Chikhaoui, M. (2022). Controlling the Quality of GAN-Based Generated Images for Predictions Tasks. In: El Yacoubi, M., Granger, E., Yuen, P.C., Pal, U., Vincent, N. (eds) Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence. ICPRAI 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13363. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09037-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09037-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09036-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09037-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics