Skip to main content

Feature Learning by Attention and Ensemble with 3D U-Net to Glioma Tumor Segmentation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries (BrainLes 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 12963))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

BraTS2021 Task1 is research on segmentation of intrinsically heterogeneous brain glioblastoma sub-regions in mpMRI scans. Base on BraTS 2020 top ten team’s solution (open brats2020, ranked among the top ten teams work), we proposed a similar as 3D U-Net neural network, called as TE U-Net, to differentiate glioma sub-regions class. According that automatically learns to focus on sub-regions class structures of varying shapes and sizes, we proposed TE U-Net which is similar with U-Net++ network architecture. Firstly, we reserved encoder second and third stage’s skip connect design, then also cut off first stage skip connect design. Secondly, multiple stage features through attention gate block before features skip connect, so as to ensemble channels and space region information to suppress irrelevant regions. Finally, in order to improve model performance, on network post-processing stage, we ensemble multiple similar 3D U-Net with attention module. On the online validation database, the TE U-Net architecture get best result is that the GD-enhancing tumor (ET) dice is 83.79%, the peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue (TC) dice is 86.47%, and the necrotic tumor core (WT) dice is 91.98%, Hausdorff(95%) values is 6.39,7.81,3.86and Sensitivity values is 82.20%, 83.99%, 91.92% respectively. And our solution achieved a dice of 85.62%,86.70%,90.64% for ET,TC and WT, as well as Hausdorff(95%) is 18.70,21.06,10.88 on final private test dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn25829067/wiki/610865

  2. Neugut, A.I., et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging-based screening for asymptomatic brain tumors: a review. Oncologist 24(3), 375 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Henry, T., et al.: Brain tumor segmentation with self-ensembled, deeply-supervised 3D U-net neural networks: a BraTS 2020 challenge solution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.01045 (2020)

  4. Baid, U., et al., The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 benchmark on brain tumor segmentation and radiogenomic classification. arXiv:2107.02314 (2021)

  5. Menze, B.H., et al.: The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 34(10), 1993–2024 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakas, S., et al.: Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features. Nat. Sci. Data 4, 170117 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bakas, S., et al.: segmentation labels and radiomic features for the pre-operative scans of the TCGA-GBM collection. Cancer Imaging Arch. (2017). https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.KLXWJJ1Q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bakas, S., et al.: Segmentation labels and radiomic features for the pre-operative scans of the TCGA-LGG collection. Cancer Imaging Arch. (2017). https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.GJQ7R0EF

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Taha, A.A., Hanbury, A.: Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool. BMC Med. Imaging 15(1), 1–28 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Isensee, F., et al.: nnU-Net for brain tumor segmentation. International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, pp. 118–132. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dice, L.R.: Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26(3), 297–302 (1945)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou, Z., et al.: UNet++: a nested U-Net architecture for medical image segmentation. Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support, pp. 3–11. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Çiçek, Ö., et al.: 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pp. 424–432. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oktay, O., et al.: Attention U-Net: Learning where to look for the pancreas. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03999 (2018)

  16. Liu, Z., et al.: Deep learning based brain tumor segmentation: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.09479 (2020)

  17. Lei, T., et al.: Medical image segmentation using deep learning: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.13120 (2020)

  18. Nair, V., Hinton, G.E.: Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines. ICML (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, Y., He, K.: Group normalization. In: Ferrari, V., Hebert, M., Sminchisescu, C., Weiss, Y. (eds.) ECCV 2018. LNCS, vol. 11217, pp. 3–19. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01261-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, L., et al.: On the variance of the adaptive learning rate and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.03265 (2019)

  21. Zhang, M.R., et al.: Lookahead optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step back. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.08610 (2019)

  22. Yong, H., et al.: Gradient centralization: A new optimization technique for deep neural networks. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp 635–652. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ruder, S.: An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04747 (2016)

  24. Tan, M., Le, Q.: Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 6105–6114. PMLR (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. https://github.com/shijianjian/EfficientNet-PyTorch-3D

  26. Sagi, O., Rokach, L.: Ensemble learning: a survey. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 8(4), e1249 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. https://www.kaggle.com/c/rsna-miccai-brain-tumor-radiogenomic-classification/overview

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhulin An .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cai, X., Lou, S., Shuai, M., An, Z. (2022). Feature Learning by Attention and Ensemble with 3D U-Net to Glioma Tumor Segmentation. In: Crimi, A., Bakas, S. (eds) Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries. BrainLes 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12963. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09002-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09002-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09001-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09002-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics