Skip to main content

Safety, Green and Blue Networks, Active Mobility and Walkability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
(Re)Discovering Proximity

Abstract

In this chapter, proximity is defined in relation to urban mobility and ecological connections, with infrastructures and the environment representing two essential networks for the regeneration of contemporary cities. The fragility of cities (territorial vulnerabilities and social divisions) imposes a rediscovery of the notion of caring and the wellbeing of residents (health and safety). This is possible by promoting paths for slow and active mobility, completed by and unfolding within vaster ecological-environmental and landscape corridors. The quarter becomes a field for experimenting with new variable geometry networks, to be calibrated concerning needs of accessibility and inclusion, of public health, not to mention the implementation of an ecological and digital transition. In this vision, the base units of settlement resemble the cells of a healthier body. The action of caring becomes an attitude toward design focused on increasing resilience toward future challenges, rather than a solution to the problems of the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Covid-19—Situazione nel mondo (salute.gov.it).

  2. 2.

    https://www.un.org/en/coronavirus/covid-19-urban-world.

  3. 3.

    https://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/cleaner_air/index.html#introduction.

  4. 4.

    Italian environmentalist association, instituted in 1980. Legambiente is involved in awareness-raising campaigns and mobilisation to defend the territory, the environment and human health. The association combats problems of smog, nuclear energy, unauthorised construction, and illegal waste dumps. Additionally, Legambiente promotes alternative and renewable energies, energy savings and the conservation of protected areas.

  5. 5.

    https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/mobility-strategy_en.

  6. 6.

    https://civitas.eu/news/harmony-projects-sees-first-drone-delivery-for-medicines.

  7. 7.

    CIVITAS is one of the flagship programs helping the European Commission achieve its ambitious mobility and transport goals, and in turn those in the European Green Deal. Since its launch in 2002, CIVITAS has advanced research and innovation in sustainable urban mobility and enabled local authorities to develop, test and roll out measures via a range of projects. A series of ten thematic areas underpin these (https://civitas.eu/about).

  8. 8.

    Referring to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities from 2006 (ratified by Italy in 2009) “Persons with disabilities include those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which in interaction with various barriers may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others”.

  9. 9.

    The Decree issued by the Ministry of Public Works on 14 June 1989, n. 236 titled Prescrizioni tecniche necessarie a garantire l’accessibilità, l’adattabilità e la visitabilità degli edifici privati e di edilizia residenziale pubblica, ai fini del superamento e dell’eliminazione delle barriere architettoniche implemented Law 13/1989. Article 3 defines three general criteria for defining a space (built and open) of quality: accessibility, visitability and adaptability. In particular, “accessibility reaches its highest level when it consents the total fruition of one’s surroundings”.

  10. 10.

    The PAU is a technical document that illustrates the relations between buildings, infrastructures and users, pointing out risks, obstacles or other sources of embarrassment or discrimination.

  11. 11.

    https://universaldesign.ie/What-is-Universal-Design/.

  12. 12.

    The term was coined by Horace Walpole during the eighteenth century.

  13. 13.

    https://issuu.com/saf_arch/docs/spazio_pubblico_-_linee_guida_di_progettazione.

  14. 14.

    https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/brochure/new_leipzig_charter/new_lei_pzig_charter_en.pdf.

  15. 15.

    https://www.governo.it/sites/governo.it/files/PNRR.pdf.

  16. 16.

    https://aliautonomie.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/INU_Piano-Integrato-di-Area-10.12.2021.pdf.

  17. 17.

    http://water.epa.gov/infrastructure/greeninfrastructure/.

  18. 18.

    https://www.epicentro.iss.it/passi/indicatori/attivit%C3%A0Fisica.

  19. 19.

    https://pedestriansfirst.itdp.org/city.

  20. 20.

    https://www.bmv.bz.it/it/glossario-parole-chiave-e-riviste/chronic-care-model/.

  21. 21.

    The Ospedali di Comunità are healthcare facilities for medically stable patients who no longer require hospital care but remain too unstable to be treated as outpatients or in-home patients.

  22. 22.

    The Casa di Comunità is a multipurpose facility that offers healthcare and social services under one roof, thanks to the cooperation among and integration of multiple healthcare professionals and outpatient structures. Additionally, the presence of social workers in the Case di Comunità makes it possible to reinforce the role of territorial social services (Bartoloni 2021). The social dimension is the distinguishing feature of the Case della Salute.

References

  • Ali-Toudert F (2007) Sustainability and human comfort at urban level: evaluation and design guidelines. In: Portugal SB 2007 conference—sustainable construction, materials and practices: challenge of the industry for the New Millennium

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreucci MB (2017) Progettare green infrastructure. Tecnologie, valori e strumenti per la resilienza urbana, Wolters Kluwer Italia, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky A (1979) Health. Jossey-Bass Publishers, Stress and Coping. San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcidiacono A, Ronchi S (2021) Challenges for contemporary spatial planning in Italy. Towards a new paradigm. In: Arcidiacono A, Ronchi S (eds) Ecosystem services and green infrastructure. Cities and nature. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54345-7_1

  • ARUP (2014) City alive. Rethinking green infrastructures, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ARUP (2016) City alive. Towards a walking world, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Babic N (2021) Superblocks—the future of walkability in cities?. Academia Letters, Article 747, https://doi.org/10.20935/AL747

  • Balletto G (2022) Some reflections between city form and mobility. Dilemma between past and present. TeMA J Special issue 1(2022) new Scenario for safe mobility in urban areas, p 7–15. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/8651

  • Bartoloni M (2021) Case di comunità, ecco l’identikit: servizi h24 con medici e infermieri. IlSole24Ore, 31 October 2021, retrieved from https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/case-comunita-ecco-l-identikit-servizi-h24-medici-e-infermieri-AEPGi2r

  • Barton H, Grant M (2006) A health map for the local human habitat. J Royal Soc Promot Public Health 126(6):252–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466424006070466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (2018) La società globale del rischio, Asterios

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibri SE, Krogstie J (2020) Smart eco-city strategies and solutions for sustainability: the cases of royal seaport, Stockholm, and Western Harbor, Malmö, Sweden. Urban Science, no. 4, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci4010011

  • Blečić I, Cecchini A, Fancello G, Talu V, Trunfio GA (2015) Camminabilità e capacità urbane: valutazione e supporto alla decisione e alla pianificazione urbanistica, Agenzia delle entrate. 10.14609/Ti_1_15_4i

    Google Scholar 

  • Borlini B (2010) Il quartiere nella città contemporanea. Come e perché occuparsene. Quaderni di Sociologia, no. 52/2010, OpenEdition J 13–29. https://doi.org/10.4000/qds.717

  • Brown K, Mijic DA (2019) Integrating green and blue spaces into our cities: making it happen. Briefing paper no. 30, Imperial College London

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne M, Allen J (2011) Enhancing the sustainability of urban freight transport and logistic. Transport and communication bulletin for Asia and the Pacific, no. 80, retrieved from https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/bulletin80_Article-1.pdf

  • Campos Venuti G (1983) Città, metropoli, tecnologie. Franco Angeli, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos Venuti G (2004) Verde in città per urbanistica e ambientalismo oggi. Relazione al Convegno ‘Una città per il verde’, Padova, February 2004. Retrieved from https://www.pausania.it/per-un-ecologia-applicata-nel-verde/

  • Campos Venuti G (2009) Ambiente e nuova urbanistica a Modena negli anni Sessanta. In: Bulgarelli V, Mazzeri C (eds) La città e l’ambiente, pp 67–74. APM edizioni, Carpi (MO)

    Google Scholar 

  • Capolongo S, Buffoli M, Brambilla A, Rebecchi A (2020) Strategie urbane di pianificazione e progettazione in salute, per migliorare la qualità e l’attrattività dei luoghi. Techne, no. 19, Firenze University Press, pp 271–279. https://doi.org/10.13128/techne-7837

  • Capuano A (2020) STREETSCAPE. Strade vitali, reti della mobilità sostenibile, vie verdi. Quodlibet, Macerata

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC—Commission of the European Communities (2009) L’adattamento ai cambiamenti climatici: verso un quadro d’azione europeo (COM(2009) 147 def.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Censis (2010) 44° Rapporto annuale sulla situazione sociale del Paese. Il sistema di welfare, pp 257–348. Retrieved from https://www.censis.it/sites/default/files/downloads/welfare.pdf

  • Cerasoli M (2015) Qualità urbana, mobilità, qualità della vita: una ‘grammatica’ per il Rinascimento della città. Urbanistica Informazioni, 263:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiesura A (2018) Infrastrutture verdi. Qualità dell’ambiente urbano—XIV Rapporto, ISPRA Stato dell’Ambiente, no. 82

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Aira PV (2017) La superficie dello spazio pubblico. Il lavoro ‘sul piano’ nel progetto dei vuoti urbani. L’ADC, L’architettura delle città. J Sci Soc Ludovico Quaroni, no. 8/2017, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte (2020) Outlook Salute Italia 2021. Il Sistema Sanitario Italiano tra pubblico e privato: sostenibilità e prospettive, 22 January 2020, Rome. Retrieved from https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/it/Documents/public-sector/Deloitte%20%Outlook%20Salute%20Italia%202021_Presentazione%20risultati% 20ricerca.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati A (2017) Un passo dopo l’altro: nascita e crescita delle aree pedonali in Italia. ‘Mobilità pedonale in città’—XIII RAU (2017). ISPRA Stato dell’Ambiente, no. 75

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorato E (2020) Preventive urbanism. The role of health in designing active cities, Quodlibet Studio, Macerata

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey K, Pafka E (2020) What is walkability? The Urban DMA. Urban Studies 57(1):93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018819727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC—European Commission: Infrastrutture verdi (2013) Rafforzare il capitale naturale in Europa (SWD(2013) 155 final)

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA—European Environmental Agency (2021) Urban sustainability in Europe—opportunities for challenging times, Briefing no. 3/2021, June 12. Retrieved from https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/urban-sustainability-in-europe/urban-sustainability-in-europe

  • Finka M, Ondrejička V, Jamečný L (2016) Urban safety as spatial quality in smart cities. Smart city 360° first EAI international summit, smart city 360°, Bratislava, Slovakia and Toronto, Canada, 13–16 October 2015, Springer Professional

    Google Scholar 

  • Fior M, Galuzzi P, Vitillo P (2022a) New Milan metro-line M4. From infrastructural project to design scenario enabling urban resilience. Trans Res Procedia 60:306–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.040

  • Fior M, Galuzzi P, Vitillo P (2022b) Well-being, greenery, and active mobility. Urban design proposal for a network of proximity hubs along the new metro line in Milan. TeMA Special Issue (1) new scenarios for safe mobility in urban areas, pp 17–30. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/8650

  • Gasparrini C (2015) Nella città, sulla città—in the city, on the cities, List, Trento

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparrini C (2017) Una buona urbanistica per convivere con i rischi. Urbanistica, no. 159/2017, pp 4–9, INU Edizioni, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparrini C, Terracciano A (2017) Dross city. Metabolismo urbano e progetto di riciclo dei drosscape, List, Trento

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes da Filicaia M (2020) La sanità ai tempi del coronavirus. Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl Architects (2020) Public space and public life during Covid-19. Retrieved from https://covid19.gehlpeople.com/lockdown

  • Guzzabocca C, Legoratti S (2021) Una nuova prossimità. La riappropriazione della strada ai tempi della pandemia. Master's Thesis in Progettazione dell'Architettura, Politecnico di Milano, A Y 2020–2021, Supervisor Prof. M Buffoli, Co-Supervisor Prof. M Fior, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO—International Labour Office, UNICEF—United Nations Children’s Fund (2021) Child labour: global estimates 2020, trends and the road forward, ILO and UNICEF, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Indini P (2015) La strada come progetto di spazio pubblico. Strumenti convenzionali e non convenzionali per il progetto dello spazio pubblico a partire dalle differenze degli individui. Ph.D.’s Thesis in Architettura e Pianificazione XXVII Ciclo, A.Y. 2014/2015 at Università degli Studi di Sassari, retrieved from Street as project of public space—La strada come progetto di spazio pubblico by Paola Indini

    Google Scholar 

  • ISCA—International Sport and Culture Association (2015) The economic cost of physical inactivity in Europe. Centre Econom Bus Res

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT—Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (2019) Conoscere il mondo della disabilità: persone, relazioni e istituzioni. Retrieved from https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/236301

  • John H, Marrs C, Neubert M (ed) (2019) Manuale sulle Infrastrutture Verdi—Basi teoretiche e concettuali, termini e definizioni, estratto in italiano. Interreg Central Europe MaGICLandscapes Project, Dresda. Retrieved from https://www.interreg-central.eu/Content.Node/MaGICLandscapes-Manuale-sulle-Infrastrutture-Verdi.pdf

  • Kohl HW 3rd, Craig CL, Lambert EV, Inoue S, Alkandari JR, Leetongin G, Kahlmeier S (2012) The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. In: Lancet physical activity series working group 380(9838):294–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60898-8

  • Kurcharski A (2017) Il futuro della medicina. In: Al-Khalili J (ed) Il futuro che verrà. Quello che gli scienziati possono prevedere, pp 55–65. Bollati Boringhieri, Turin

    Google Scholar 

  • Legambiente (2020) Ecosistema urbano. Rapporto sulle performance ambientali delle città 2020, In Laurenti M and Bono L (eds), Legambiente

    Google Scholar 

  • Legambiente (2021) Ecosistema urbano. Rapporto sulle performance ambientali delle città 2021, In Laurenti M and Trentin M (eds), Legambiente

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch K (1960) The image of the city. It tran 2006, L’immagine della città, Marsilio, Venice

    Google Scholar 

  • Manigrasso M (2019) La città adattiva. Il grado zero dell’urban design, Quodlibet, Macerata

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini E (2021) Abitare la prossimità: Idee per la città dei 15 minuti, Egea

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchigiani E, Basso S, Di Biagi P (2017) Esperienze urbane. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, Trieste, Spazi pubblici e città contemporanea

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlo G (2015) L’attrazione speciale. Maggioli, Santarcangelo di Romagna

    Google Scholar 

  • Miano P (2020) HEALTHSCAPE. Nodi di salubrità, attrattori urbani, architetture per la cura. Quodlibet, Macerta

    Google Scholar 

  • Morello E (2021) Città visibili: lo spazio urbano come luogo di cura allargato. Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli. Retrieved from https://fondazionefeltrinelli.it/citta-visibili-lo-spazio-urbano-come-luogo-di-cura-allargato/

  • Mosca EI, Capolongo S (2020) A universal design based framework to assess usability and inclusion of buildings. In: Gervasi O et al (eds) Computational science and its applications—ICCSA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12253, pp 316–331. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58814-4_22

  • Nomisma (2021) PNRR missione salute. Verso una sanità territoriale: un piano di investimenti in strutture. Report July 2021. Retrieved from https://www.rekeep.com/media/studi-dossier/nuova-sanita-di-prossimita

  • Oliva F ()1993 Urbanistica ed ecologia. In: Campos Venuti G, Oliva F (eds) Cinquant’anni di urbanistica in Italia. 1942–1992, pp 201–219, Laterza, Bari-Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzini F (1993) Per i piaceri del popolo. L’evoluzione del giardino pubblico in Europa dalle origini al XX secolo, Zanichelli, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Quammen D (2012) Spillover. Animal infections and the next human pandemic, It. tran., 2020, Spillover. L’evoluzione delle pandemie, Adelphi, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Raganà C (2016) Storia della pedonalizzazione: da dove vengono le zone pedonali. Tuttogreen. 7 May 2016. Retrieved from https://www.tuttogreen.it/pedonalizzazione-citta/

  • Ramboll (2016) Strengthening blue-green infrastructure in our cities. Enhancing blue-green infrastructure and social performance in high density urban environment. Ramboll Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravagnan C, Cerasoli M, Amato C (2022) Post-Covid cities and mobility. A proposal for an antifragile strategy in Rome. TeMA J Special issue 1(2022) new Scenario for safe mobility in urban areas, pp 87–100. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/8652

  • Ricci L (2021) Città contemporanea e nuovo welfare. Una rete di reti per rigenerare la città esistente. In: Poli I.: Città esistente e rigenerazione urbana. Per una integrazione tra Urbs e Civitas, pp 11–27. Aracne

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristvej J, Lacinák M, Ondrejka R (2020) On smart city and safe city concepts. Mobile Netw Appl 25:836–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01524-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronchi S, Arcidiacono A (2021) Lessons from Italian experiences: bottlenecks, new challenges and opportunities. In: Arcidiacono A, Ronchi S (eds) Ecosystem services and green infrastructure. Cities and Nature. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54345-7_17

  • Rossi I (2022) Paris 2024, plan of accessibility of roads and public spaces. Urbanistica, no. 164/2022, INU Edizioni, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallis J F, Cerin E, Conway T L, Adams M A, Frank L D, Pratt M, Salvo D, Schipperijn J, Smith G, Cain K L, Davey R, Kerr J, Lai P C, Mitàs J, Reis R, Sarmineto O L, Schofield G, Troelsen J, Van Dyck D, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Owen N (2016) Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: A cross-sectional study. May 28(387), pp. 2207–2217. Lancet https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2.

  • Secchi B (1986) Progetto di suolo/Projects for the ground. Casabella, 520–521:19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi B (2011) La nuova questione urbana: ambiente, mobilità e disuguaglianze sociali. CRIOS 1(2011):89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi B (1989) Lo spessore della strada. Casabella, no. 553–554, January, p 38

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi B (2006) Progetto di suolo 2. Spazi pubblici contemporanei. In: Aymonino A, Mosco VP (eds) Spazi pubblici contemporanei. Architettura a volume zero, Skira, pp 287–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi B (2013) La città dei ricchi e la città dei poveri, Laterza, Rome-Bari

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi A (2019) Resilient urban forms: a review of literature on streets and street networks. Build Environ 147:171–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spirito P (2013) La nuova stagione delle pedonalizzazioni. Huffington Post, 26 October 2013. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.it/pietro-spirito/la-nuova-stagione-delle-pedonalizzazioni_b_3815731.html

  • Stefanelli T, Di Bartolo C, Galli G, Pastori E, Quak H (2020) Policy note. Smart choices for cities. Making urban freight logistics more sustainable, Civitas Wiki Consortium

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamminga K, Cortesão J, Bakx M (2020) Convivial greenstreets: a concept for climate-responsive urban design. Sustainability 12:3790. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093790

  • Toppetti F, Ferretti LV (2020) La cura della città. Politiche e progetti, Quodlibet, Macerata

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat—United Nation Habitat (2020) UN-Habitat guidance on Covid-19 and public space

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat—United Nation Habitat (2021) Cities and pandemics: towards a more just, green and healthy future. United Nations Human Settlements Programme, Revised edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbanistica n. 164/2022, ‘Città Accessibili’, INU Edizioni, Rome (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vich G, Marquet O, Miralles-Guasc C (2019) Green streetscape and walking: exploring active mobility patterns in dense and compact cities. J Transp Health 12:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WBG—World Bank Group (2020) Poverty and shared prosperity 2020, international bank for reconstruction and development. The World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • WEF—World Economic Forum (2020) The future of the last-mile ecosystem. Transition roadmaps for public- and private-sector players, world economic forum, Cologny-Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO—World Health Organization (2010) Global recommendations on physical activity for health. WHO Press, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO—World Health Organization (2018) Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030. More active people for a healthier world. WHO Press, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO—World Health Organization (2021) Green and blue spaces and mental health. New evidence and perspectives for action. WHO Press, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO—World Health Organization (2009) Global health risk. Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. WHO Press, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng C, Huang WY, Sheridan S, Sit CH, Chen XK, Wong SH (2020) Covid-19 pandemic brings a sedentary lifestyle in young adults: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(17):6035. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piergiorgio Vitillo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fior, M., Galuzzi, P., Pasqui, G., Vitillo, P. (2022). Safety, Green and Blue Networks, Active Mobility and Walkability. In: (Re)Discovering Proximity. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08958-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics