Skip to main content

Practices and Strategies of Gender Representation in Danish Political Parties: Dilemmas of “Everyday Democracy”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Party Politics and the Implementation of Gender Quotas

Part of the book series: Gender and Politics ((GAP))

  • 340 Accesses

Abstract

Denmark is characterized as a non-quota country and a Nordic enfant terrible when it comes to women’s political representation. Women’s representation at the national, parliamentary level has stagnated at 37-39 percent, which has remained the average since 1998. This development covers large inter-party differences: The low percentages of women’s representation in the two largest parties (25% of the Social Democrats, and 35% of the Liberals) contrast with the high percentages in the parties supporting the current Social Democratic government (45% of the Red-Green Alliance, 56% of the Social-Liberal Party, and 79% of the Socialist People’s Party). At the same time, the average percentage of women candidates is lower than the percentage of women elected. The chapter serves as a counter example in the book, addressing internal differences in practices and strategies of recruitment and nomination in parties without formal quota systems and a lack of legislative quotas. It focuses on internal, informal measures to promote gender equality in representation (or the lack hereof) and asks why some parties are laggards while others have achieved high levels of women’s representation. The framing and focus of the chapter is are on the dilemmas of ‘everyday democracy’ of political parties (the meso-level), exploring the diversity of practices and strategies for training, visibility, and empowerment of women candidates as measures of gender equality/parity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergqvist, C., Borchorst, A., Christensen, A.-D., Ramsted-Silén, V., Raaum, N., & Styrkársdóttir, A. (Eds.). (1999). Equal democracies? Gender and politics in the Nordic Countries. Scandinavian University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjarnegård, E., & Kenny, M. (2016). Comparing candidate selection: A feminist institutionalist approach. Government and Opposition 51(3), 370–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borchorst, A., & Christensen, A-D. (2003). Kønskvotering i SF og forskerstililnger – diskursiv praksis og forandring. In A. Borchorst and D. Dahlerup (Eds.) Ligestillingspolitik som praksis og politisk diskurs (Equality politics as Praxis and discourse] (pp. 101–123). Fredriksberg C: Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchorst, A., & Dahlerup, D. (Eds.). (2020). Konflikt og konsensus. Det danske ligestillingspolitiske regime. Frederiksberg: Frydenlund Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch Jensen, R. (2000). Lokale partiorganisationer (Ph.D.-afhandling). Syddansk Universitet: Odense Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder-Meyer, M. (2013). Gendered recruitment without trying: How local party recruiters affect women’s representation. Politics & Gender, 9(4), 390–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, D. (1988). From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11(4), 275–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, D. (2013). Denmark: High representation of women without gender quota. In D. Dahlerup & M. Leyenaar (Eds.) .Breaking male Dominance in democracies (pp. 146–171). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, D. (2018). Gender equality as a closed case: A survey among members of the 2015 Danish Parliament Scandinavian Political Studies, 41, 2, 188–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, K. (2015). Encouragement is not enough: Addressing social and structural barriers to female recruitment. Politics & Gender, 11, 4, 759–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeli, I., & Mazur, A. (2018). Taking implementation seriously in assessing success: The politics of gender equality policy. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1–2), 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiig, C. (2009). Women in Danish Politics: Challenges to the Notion of Gender Equality. In J. Gelb & M. L. Palley (Eds.) Women and Politics around the World: A Comparative History and Survey (pp. 311–328). ABC-Clio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiig, C., & Siim, B. (2012). Democratization of Denmark: The political inclusion of women. In B. R. Ruiz & R. Rubio-Marín (Eds.) The Struggle for Female Suffrage in Europe: Voting to Become Citizens (pp. 62–78). Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiig, C., & Siim, B. (2020). Gender and politics: The limits of equality politics. In P. M. Christiansen, J. Elklit & P. Nedergaard (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on Danish politics (pp. 365–381). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, O., & Rickne, J. (2016). Electoral competition and gender differences in political careers. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11(1), 59–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin-Rittberger, J., & Rittberger, B. (2014). Do electoral rules matter? Explaining national differences in women’s representation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 15(4), 496–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freidenvall, L., & Dahlerup, D., & Skjeie, H. (2006). The Nordic countries: An incremental model. In D. Dahlerup (Ed.), Women, Quotas and Politics (pp. 55–82). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauja, A., & Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (2021). The comparative study of political party organization: Changing perspectives and prospects. Ephemera. Theory & politics in organizations. Online. 21 (2), 19–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goul Andersen, J., & Shamshiri-Petersen, D. (2020). Værdimæssig polarisering: Kønsforskelle i politiske holdninger. In A. Borchorst & D. Dahlerup (Eds.), Konflikt og konsensus. Det danske ligestillingspolitiske regime (pp.107–214). Frederiksberg: Frydenlund Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., Norris, P., & Welzel, C. (2002). Gender equality and democracy. Comparative Sociology, 1(3–4), 321–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, T. K. (2004). De folkevalgte. En analyse af Folketingsmedlemmernes sociale baggrund og repræsentationsadfærd. Aarhus Universitetsforlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Karvonen, L. & Selle, P. (Eds) (1995). Closing the gap: Women in Nordic Politics. Dartmouth Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M. & Verge, T. (2016). Opening up the Black Box: Gender and candidate selection in a new era. Government and Opposition, 51(3), 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjær, U., & Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (2019). The Hour-Glass Pattern of women’s representation. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29(3), 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J. L., & Fox, R. L. (2010). It still takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P., & Lovenduski, J. (1995). Political recruitment: Gender, race and class in the British Parliament. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, K. (2003). Party Membership Linkage: The Danish Case. Ph.D.-dissertation. Copenhagen University: Department of Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piscopo, J. (2019). The Limits of Leaning in: Ambition, Recruitment, and Candidate Training in Comparative Perspective. Politics, Groups and Identities, 7(4), 817–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruysers, S., Cross, W., Gauja, A., & Rahat, G. (2017). Candidate selection rules and democratic outcomes: The impact of Parties on women’s representation. In S. E. Scarrow, P. D. Webb, & T. Poguntke. Organizing political parties: Representation, participation and power (pp. 208–233). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolandsen Agustín, L., Siim, B., & Borchorst, A. (2018). Gender equality without gender quotas: Dilemmas in the Danish approach to gender equality and citizenship. In E. Lépinard & R. Rubio-Marín (Eds.), Transforming gender citizenship: The irresistible rise of gender quotas in Europe (pp. 400–423). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, K. (2010). Life’s a party: Do political parties help or Hinder women? Harvard International Review, 32(1), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verge, T. (2015). The gender regime of political parties: Feedback effects between ‘supply’ and ‘demand’. Politics & Gender, 11(4), 754–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verge, T. (2020). Political party gender action plans: Pushing gender change forward beyond quotas. Party Politics, 26(2), 238–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolbrecht, C., & Campbell, D. E. (2007). Leading by example: Female members of parliament as political role models. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 921–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2021). Global Gender Gap Report 2021. Insight Report. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lise Rolandsen Agustín .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rolandsen Agustín, L., Fiig, C., Siim, B. (2023). Practices and Strategies of Gender Representation in Danish Political Parties: Dilemmas of “Everyday Democracy”. In: Lang, S., Meier, P., Sauer, B. (eds) Party Politics and the Implementation of Gender Quotas. Gender and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08931-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics