Abstract
Quota implementation in Croatia has been riddled with ambivalence, contradiction, and obstruction since the enactment of the 2008 Act on Gender Equality. It was only at the 2020 elections that 22.5% of women were elected to parliament. Prior to that, paradoxically, Croatia had achieved the highest levels of women’s parliamentary representation before the introduction of legislative quotas. This chapter analyzes the implementation of gender quotas and explains why the proclaimed goal of 40% gender-balanced representation is not yet achieved. Emphasis is put on the implementation of quotas by the major parties in parliament during the 2011, 2015, 2016, and 2020 elections. The analysis suggests that, with the exception of early elections, the smaller parties have adjusted to quota requirements gradually, but, and this is important, there has been no meaningful recalibration of practices by the major parties. Simultaneously, women were placed at the bottom of the candidate lists and parties that did not comply with the quota rules were not sanctioned by any significant means. Indictments are not issued, or are issued years after the infractions occurred, courts are not giving their rulings in a timely manner, and the penalties awarded are inadequate. The Croatian case serves as an apt example (and a cautionary tale) of quota failure due to poor policy design, limited implementation, and an overall lack of commitment by major policy actors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antić Gaber, M., & Lokar, S. (2006). The Balkans: From total rejection to gradual acceptance of gender quotas. In D. Dahlerup (Ed.), Women, quotas and politics (pp. 138–167). Routledge.
Ćelap, K., & Nikić Čakar, D. (2017). Unutarstranačka demokracija u Hrvatskoj: (Ne)moć običnih članova u procesu stvaranja stranačkih politika. Politička Misao, 54(3), 80–107.
Čular, G. (2018). Stability and permissiveness: Party regulation and party competition in Croatia. In F. Casal Bértoa & I. van Biezen (Eds.), The regulation of post-communist party politics (pp. 257–289). Routledge.
DIP [State Electoral Commission]. (2011). Kandidatura – statistički podaci o zastupljenosti kandidatkinja i kandidata na kandidacijskim listama [Candidacy—Statistical data on female and male candidates on lists]. https://ravnopravnost.gov.hr/UserDocsImages/arhiva/images/pdf/izbori2011/DIP%20Izbori%20za%20zastupnike%20u%20Hrvatski%20sabor%202011_Statistika%20kandidata%20po%20spolu.pdf. Accessed 7 December 2011.
DIP [State Electoral Commission]. (2015). Kandidatura – statistički podaci [Candidacy—Statistical data]. https://www.izbori.hr/izbori/ws.nsf/954F6FCC6FBA0326C1257EE800340BD2/$FILE/statistika_kandidature_2015.pdf. Accessed 30 October 2016.
DIP [State Electoral Commission]. (2016). Kandidatura – statistički podaci [Candidacy—Statistical data]. http://www.izbori.hr/izbori/ws.nsf/7310D79B396EAE62C125801000444FA0/$FILE/statistika_kandidature_2016.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2016.
DIP [State Electoral Commission]. (2020). Kandidatura – statistički podaci [Candidacy—Statistical data]. https://www.izbori.hr/site/UserDocsImages/2020/Izbori_za_zastupnike_u_HS/Kandidatura/Sabor%202020%20Kandidatura%20-%20Statisti%C4%8Dki%20izvje%C5%A1taj_v1.1.pdf. Accessed 27 February 2021.
DORH [State Attorney’s Office]. (2021). Izvješće glavnog državnog odvjetnika Republike Hrvatske o radu državnih odvjetništava u 2020. godini [Report of the State Attorney General of the Republic of Croatia on the work of state attorney’s offices in 2020]. www.dorh.hr/fgs.axd?id=6496. Accessed 21 May 2021.
Godeč, Ž. (2021). HDZ ne mari za kaznu: U Zagrebu od 47 kandidata na izborima samo 13 žena [HDZ does not care about fines: In Zagreb, out of 47 candidates in the elections, only 13 are women]. https://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/hdz-ne-mari-za-kaznu-u-zagrebu-od-47-kandidata-na-izborima-samo-13-zena-15072067. Accessed 21 May 2021.
HINA [Croatian News Agency]. (2015). Za liste na kojima nema 40 posto žena strankama prijeti kazna i do 50.000 kn [For lists that do not include 40 percent of women, parties face fines of up to 50,000 HRK]. https://www.telegram.hr/politika-kriminal/za-liste-na-kojima-nema-40-posto-zena-kazna-i-do-50-tisuca-kuna. Accessed 13 November 2015.
HS [Croatian Parliament]. (2003). Zakon o ravnopravnosti spolova [Act on Gender Equality]. Narodne novine 36.
HS [Croatian Parliament]. (2008). Zakon o ravnopravnosti spolova [Act on Gender Equality]. Narodne novine 82.
HS [Croatian Parliament]. (2015). Zakon o izborima zastupnika u Hrvatski sabor [Act on the Election of Representatives to the Croatian Parliament]. Narodne novine 66.
Karlović Sabolić, M. (2020). U zadnjih 30 godina nema političara koji je efikasnije rasturio ‘žensku kvotu’ od Zorana Milanovića. Na Dan žena, on i SDP mogu se samo pokriti ušima [In the last 30 years, there is no politician who was more efficient in shattering ‘the woman’s quota’ than Zoran Milanović. On International Women’s Day, he and the SDP can only cover their ears]. https://slobodnadalmacija.hr/vijesti/politika/u-zadnjih-30-godina-nema-politicara-koji-je-efikasnije-rasturio-zensku-kvotu-od-zorana-milanovica-na-dan-zena-on-i-sdp-mogu-se-samo-pokriti-usima-1007799. Accessed 10 March 2020.
Kasapović, M. (2001). Kandidacijski postupci u demokratskim političkim sustavima. Politička Misao, 38(4), 3–20.
Kristović, I. (2021a). Pravobraniteljica za RTL.hr o nestanku prijava za spolnu kvotu: ‘Važno je da odredbe ne ostanu mrtvo slovo na papiru’ [Ombudsperson for RTL.hr on the disappearance of gender quota indictments: ‘It is important that the provisions do not remain on paper only’]. https://www.rtl.hr/vijesti-hr/novosti/hrvatska/3962052/pravobraniteljica-za-rtlhr-o-nestanku-prijava-za-spolnu-kvotu-vazno-je-da-odredbe-ne-ostanu-mrtvo-slovo-na-papiru. Accessed 13 March 2021.
Kristović, I. (2021b). Skupljamo donacije, a država je od stranaka mogla naplatiti gotovo 2 milijuna kn: Gdje su nestale prijave za kršenje ženske kvote? [We are collecting donations, and the state could have billed political parties for two million HRK: Where are the missing indictments for women’s quota violations?]. https://www.rtl.hr/vijesti-hr/novosti/hrvatska/3961772/skupljamo-donacije-a-drzava-je-od-stranaka-mogla-naplatiti-gotovo-2-milijuna-kn-gdje-su-nestale-prijave-za-krsenje-tzv-zenske-kvota. Accessed 13 March 2021.
Krook, M. L. (2016). Contesting gender quotas: Dynamics of resistance. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 4(2), 268–283.
Leaković, K. (2005). Political party quotas in the Croatian Social Democratic Party. In F. Binda & J. Ballington (Eds.), The implementation of quotas: European experiences (pp. 72–75). International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
Lombardo, E., & Mergaert, L. (2013). Gender mainstreaming and resistance to gender training: A framework for studying implementation. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 21(4), 296–311.
Murray, R. (2007). How parties evaluate compulsory quotas: A study of the implementation of the ‘parity’ law in France. Parliamentary Affairs, 60(4), 568–584.
Norris, P. (1993). Conclusions: Comparing legislative recruitment. In J. Lovenduski & P. Norris (Eds.), Gender and party politics (pp. 309–330). Sage.
Ostroški, L. (Ed.). (2020). Žene i muškarci u Hrvatskoj 2020 [Women and men in Croatia 2020]. Državni zavod za statistiku.
PRS [Gender Equality Ombudsperson]. (2016). Izvješće o radu za 2016 [Annual report for 2016]. https://www.prs.hr/application/images/uploads/IZVJE%C5%A0%C4%86A/IZVJESCE_2016_Pravobraniteljica_.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2017.
PRS [Gender Equality Ombudsperson]. (2017). Izvješće o radu za 2017 [Annual report for 2017]. https://www.prs.hr/application/images/uploads/IZVJE%C5%A0%C4%86A/IZVJE%C5%A0%C4%86E_O_RADU_ZA_2017_PRAVOBRA.pdf. Accessed 28 April 2018.
PRS [Gender Equality Ombudsperson]. (2018). Izvješće o radu za 2018 [Annual report for 2018]. https://www.prs.hr/application/images/uploads/IZVJE%C5%A0%C4%86A/Izvje%C5%A1%C4%87e_o_radu_Pravobraniteljice%20za%202018%20godinu.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2019.
PRS. [Gender Equality Ombudsperson]. (2019). Izvješće o radu za 2019 [Annual report for 2019]. https://www.prs.hr/application/images/uploads/IZVJE%C5%A0%C4%86A/IZVJESCE_O_RADU_ZA_2019_Pravobra.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2020.
PRS. [Gender Equality Ombudsperson]. (2020). Izvješće o radu za 2020 [Annual report for 2020]. https://www.prs.hr/application/images/uploads/IZVJESCE_O_RADU_2020_Pravobranit.pdf. Accessed 21 April 2021.
Šinko, M. (2009). Women in Croatian parliament—Have they reached their glass ceiling? Paper presented at the First European Conference on Gender and Politics, Belfast.
Šinko, M. (2016). Parlamentarna predstavljenost žena u Hrvatskoj: nakon nevidljivosti i staklenog stropa – regresija [Parliamentary representation of women in Croatia: After invisibility and the glass ceiling—Regression]. Političke analize, 7(27), 3–10.
Šinko, M. (2021). Rezultati izbora za zastupnike u Hrvatski sabor 2011, 2015, 2016 i 2020. godine. [Results of the elections for the Croatian Parliament in 2011, 2015, 2016 and 2020] [Unpublished Database].
Šurina, M. (2017). Odbor za Ustav raspodijelio strankama novac iz proračuna [Committee on the constitution distributed money from the budget to the parties]. https://www.tportal.hr/vijesti/clanak/odbor-za-ustav-raspodijelio-strankama-novac-iz-proracuna-20170127. Accessed 1 May 2017.
Teršelić, V., & Mladineo, M. (2006). Moć suradnje: Priručnik za suvođenje [The power of collaboration: A guide to leadership]. Centar za ženske studije.
Toma, I. (2020). Stranke koje 2017. nisu imale četrdeset posto žena na listama još nisu kažnjene [Parties that did not have forty percent of women on the lists in 2017 have not been punished yet]. https://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/stranke-koje-2017-nisu-imale-cetrdeset-posto-zena-na-listama-jos-nisu-kaznjene-15029321. Accessed 12 February 2021.
Turčin, K. (2021, May 5). HDZ, HSS i HSLS kažnjeni jer na listu za Crikvenicu nisu imali 40% žena [HDZ, HSS and HSLS punished because 40% of women were not on the list for Crikvenica]. Jutarnji list (p. 7).
URS [Gender Equality Office]. (2016). Priopćenje za javnost: Hrvatska na 92. mjestu na svijetu po broju izabranih zastupnica u Hrvatskom saboru na prošlim izborima [Press release: Croatia ranks 92nd in the world in the number of elected members of the Croatian Parliament in the last elections]. https://ravnopravnost.gov.hr/UserDocsImages//dokumenti//Priop%C4%87enje-Hrvatska%20na%2092%20%20mjestu%20na%20svijetu%20po%20broju%20izabranih%20zastupnica%20u%20HS.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2016.
USRH [Constitutional Court]. (2015). Odluka U-I-1397/2015 [Decision U-I-1397/2015]. https://sljeme.usud.hr/usud/praksaw.nsf/Praksa/C98AFD723EC8E001C1257ECD00724662?OpenDocument. Accessed 8 March 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Šinko, M. (2023). Only Stand-ins? Women’s Parliamentary Representation and Quota Implementation in Croatia Since 2011. In: Lang, S., Meier, P., Sauer, B. (eds) Party Politics and the Implementation of Gender Quotas. Gender and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08931-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08931-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08930-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08931-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)