Skip to main content

Test of Competencies (TECO) in the Bachelor’s Degree Course in Psycho and Neurodevelopmental Therapy at the “Sapienza” University of Rome: Cross Sectional Study Internal Consistency and Discriminant Validity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning Technology for Education Challenges (LTEC 2022)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Disciplinary section of the TEst of COmpetencies (TECO-D) in students of the Bachelor’s degree in Psycho and Neurodevelopmental Therapy in Italy. The sample was recruited between October and December 2019. To be included in the study, the participants had to be enrolled in the bachelor’s degree course of Psycho and Neurodevelopmental Therapy at the “Sapienza” University of Rome and had not to be outside the prescribed time for completion of exams. The test was administered digitally, during 2019, the students from different year levels completed the survey. The internal consistency for the TECO-D score was excellent (α = 0.71). The cut-off point for the TECO-D was 0.90 (95% CI 0.85–0.95) for the first year of the course, 0.95 (95% CI 0.92–0.98) for the second year of the course and 0.86 (95% CI 0.80–0.82) for the third year of the course. The scores showed that the TECO-D is able to assess the students’ skills for the three years of the course. This study had a great impact for students, researchers and academics, giving important information to improve quality of education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Newble, D.I., Jaeger, K.: The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students. Med. Educ. (1983). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1983.tb00657.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Der Vleuten, C.P.M., Verwijnen, G.M., Wijnen, W.H.F.W.: Fifteen years of experience with progress testing in a problem-based learning curriculum. Med. Teach. (1996). https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599609034142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold, L., Willoughby, T.L.: The quarterly profile examination. Acad. Med. 65, 515–516 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Galeoto, G., Rumiati, R., Sabella, M., Sansoni, J.: The use of a dedicated platform to evaluate health-professions university courses. In: Di Mascio, T., et al. (eds.) MIS4TEL 2018. AISC, vol. 804, pp. 275–284. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98872-6_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Paterniani, A., Farina, I., Galeoto, G., Quaranta, C., Sperati, F., Sansoni, J.: Electronic test of competence administration: qualitative evaluation of students’ satisfaction on telematic platform a cross sectional study. In: Popescu, E., Belén, A., Lancia, L., Simona, L., Mavroudi, A. (eds.) MIS4TEL 2019. AISC, vol. 1008, pp. 47–54. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23884-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Galeoto, G., Tofani, M., Paterniani, A., Sansoni, J., Farina, I.: Evaluation of the disciplinary competences of the students of the Bachelors degree in Nursing at Sapienza University of Rome through the TECO: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Learn. Chang. 13, 1 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Galeoto, G., Berardi, A., Pizzi, C., Farina, I., Sansoni, J.: Evaluation of the disciplinary competences of the students of the bachelor’s degree in physiotherapy at “Sapienza” University of Rome through the TECO: a cross-sectional study. In: Uden, L., Liberona, D., Sanchez, G., Rodríguez-González, S. (eds.) LTEC 2019. CCIS, vol. 1011, pp. 93–102. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20798-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman, A., Van Vleuten, C., Nouns, Z., Ricketts, C.: Progress testing internationally. Med. Teach. (2010). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2010.485231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frederiksen, N.: The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning. Am. Psychol. (1984). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.3.193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Agenzia nazionale di valutazione del sistema universitario e della ricerca. teco test sulle competenze. https://www.anvur.it/attivita/ava/teco-test-sulle-competenze/

  11. Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. https://enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf

  12. Wrigley, W., Van Der Vleuten, C.P., Freeman, A., Muijtjens, A.: A systemic framework for the progress test: Strengths, constraints and issues: AMEE Guide No. 71. Med. Teach. (2012). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.704437.

  13. McHarg, J., et al.: Assessment of progress tests. Med. Educ. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02060.x

  14. Autovalutazione ,valutazione, accreditamento iniziale e periodico delle sedi e dei corsi di studio universitari. http://attiministeriali.miur.it/anno-2016/dicembre/dm-12122016.aspx

  15. Galeoto, G., et al.: General sleep disturbance scale: translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the Italian version. CRANIO® 11, 1–9 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berardi, A., et al.: Tools to assess the quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2021.1841638

  17. Berardi, A., et al.: Evaluation instruments for executive functions in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. 1–12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2021.1908889

  18. Auletta, A.F., et al.: SCORS-G and card pull effect of TAT stories: a study with a nonclinical sample of children. Assessment 27, 1368–1377 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Manti, F., Giovannone, F., Sogos, C.: Parental stress of preschool children with generalized anxiety or oppositional defiant disorder. Front. Pediatr. 7, 415 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00415

  20. Catino, E., et al.: Screening for developmental disorders in 3- and 4-year-old Italian children: a preliminary study. Front. Pediatr. 5, 181 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D’Alvia, L., et al.: Heart rate monitoring under stress condition during behavioral analysis in children with neurodevelopmental disorders. In: 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA49120.2020.9137306

  22. Levi, G., Colonnello, V., Giacchè, R., Piredda, M.L., Sogos, C.: Building words on actions: verb enactment and verb recognition in children with specific language impairment. Res. Dev. Disabil. 35, 1036–1041 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Galeoto, G., et al.: General sleep disturbance scale: translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the Italian version. Cranio - J. Craniomandib. Pract. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2019.1627067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Panuccio, F., et al.: Development of the pregnancy and motherhood evaluation questionnaire (PMEQ) for evaluating and measuring the impact of physical disability on pregnancy and the management of motherhood: a pilot study. Disabil. Rehabil. 1–7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1802520

  25. Mokkink, L.B., et al.: COSMIN risk of bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 20, 293 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mancuso, C.A., Peterson, M.G.E., Charlson, M.E.: Comparing discriminative validity between a disease-specific and a general health scale in patients with moderate asthma. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 54, 263–274 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Galeoto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Galeoto, G., Berardi, A., Alatri, F., Giannini, M.T., Tofani, M., Valente, D. (2022). Test of Competencies (TECO) in the Bachelor’s Degree Course in Psycho and Neurodevelopmental Therapy at the “Sapienza” University of Rome: Cross Sectional Study Internal Consistency and Discriminant Validity. In: Uden, L., Liberona, D. (eds) Learning Technology for Education Challenges. LTEC 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1595. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08890-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08890-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08889-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08890-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics